yogesh
29 October 2009 at 22:53
Dear Sir,
Please advise whether Bank has the right to turned down the request of any customer who want to withdraw money from the cash counter and insist it to use ATM card???
Regards
SANDEEP BAWEJA
29 October 2009 at 22:52
If an asessee pays self-assessment tax on 29.10.09 but file return on 01.11.09 whether he is liable to pay tax under 234A for late filing of return fo rth emonth of november
yogesh
29 October 2009 at 22:51
Dear Sir,
Please advise whether Bank has the right to turned down the request of any customer who want to withdraw money from the cash counter and insist it to use ATM card???
Regards
yogesh
29 October 2009 at 22:49
Dear Sir,
Please advise whether Bank has the right to turned down the request of any customer who want to withdraw money from the cash counter and insist it to use ATM card???
Regards
yogesh
29 October 2009 at 22:43
Dear Respected experts,
I have posted the message earlier but there are ambiguities and different opinions are there which made me confused in taking the correct procedure
I reconcile the same
In previous hearing at the Hon'ble CAT, I made my plea to file the writeen arguments which was turned down by the Hon'ble Tribunal But some of the members advise me to go ahead in filing the same as if it get rejected It will be the good ground of AppealIn the light of the aforementioned facts what should I do whether I should file the Written Arguments or not?
Your opinion definately help me in giving right direction
Regards
Thanks in anticipation
yogesh
29 October 2009 at 22:40
Dear Respected experts,
I have posted the message earlier but there are ambiguities and different opinions are there which made me confused in taking the correct procedure
I reconcile the same
In previous hearing at the Hon'ble CAT, I made my plea to file the writeen arguments which was turned down by the Hon'ble Tribunal But some of the members advise me to go ahead in filing the same as if it get rejected It will be the good ground of Appeal
In the light of the aforementioned facts what should I do whether I should file the Written Arguments or not?
Your opinion definately help me in giving right direction
Regards
Thanks in anticipation
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
29 October 2009 at 22:36
Dear Learned friends,
I have a case of property from plaintiffs in which the Ex-parte injunction order has passed after that adverse parties file W.S after that I filed the fresh Amendment on the same cause of action but narrated all matter of fact which are not told in Plaint and after that Rejoinder of W.S.
But the court has dismissed the amendment that the trial has commenced or started off?
While the amendment the court has to be very linent as [Andhra Bank v. ABN Amro Bank N.V. & Ors (Civil Appeal No. 2946 of 2007) decided on 10 July, 2007]
2. Will the application for filling REPLICA is possible after rejoinder so that I copy all the part of the 'dismissed amendment' into REPLICA.
3. Any amendment granting SCC or HC ruling and its crucial wonderful marker lines in judgment if any to be noticed ?
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
29 October 2009 at 22:22
Dear Friends,
What is the clear mean of this ?
Provided that no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial has commenced, unless the Court comes to the conclusion that in spite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.
According to your own interpretation.
venkat reddy
29 October 2009 at 22:17
In mutual consent divorce once a petition is filed court will put six months time to give divorce, is there any provision where this six months period will be shortened.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Making party to State
Dear Sir,
Suppose 'P' VS 'R1, R2' is contesting a civil suit. Any Interlocutory order passed against P. Then P decides to file revision as
Crl Revision: P Vs State
so that the R will not interfere and the order will be easily set aside. It is wrong or right.
Or
We have to make the same parties in the revision which were in the civil suit or in the order.