Anonymous
06 November 2009 at 12:32
Can u pls mail me or upload notes for llb 4th Sem asap the subjects are
1. Land laws
2. Labour laws
3. Human rights n international law
4. Indirect tax
5. Company law
The first three are most required . Kindly help if convenient thanks in advance
Sunil Kumar Chauhan
06 November 2009 at 12:10
As per the contract act 1970 Rule 10.19 says "The appropriate government is empowered to grant exemption to any establishment or class of establishment or class of contractors from applicability of the provision of the act or the rule made thereunder on such conditions and restriction as may be prescribed.
I request to all experts please describe the exemption rule.And give some exemption examples.
Thanks & Regards
Sunil Kumar Chauhan
9899716860
Anonymous
06 November 2009 at 12:00
I am serving National ins. co. as a dev. officer in 2004 our co. made direct tie up with financial instt. like banks,motor dealers etc. The impact of it is a curse for us as we have no field left from where we can fetch premuim. As our job is like a contract so co.is now deducting our allowances & increaments. My queries as below.
1. The step of tie ups by the co. is legal without informing us?
2. Can co. deduct our allowances & increments when there is no fault on my side?
3. Can I challenge the co. for making these changes in any court?
Anonymous
06 November 2009 at 11:46
I am serving in an LIC.I want to take voluntry retirement agter 28yrs. of service,so Ihave some Quries as below.
1. Can LIC refuse my notice of resignation on any ground?
2. Can LIC deduct any of its dues from my Provident Fund, Gratuity, Pension?
3. If any litigation is pending in court of my union against LIC ,then can LIC refuse my retirement notice & WIll I get all benefits?
Please give information in detail ,so that I can plan accordingly.
Anonymous
06 November 2009 at 11:20
THERE HAS BEEN A LAPTOP THEFT FROM HOUSE TODAY MORNING AT 8.A.M. AND I DO NOT HAVE THE PAPERS REGARDING THE LAPTOP PURCHASED AS IT WAS BEEN GIFTED, SO KINDLY LET ME KNOW WHAT ALL STEPS TO BE TAKEN REGARDING THIS. APART FROM LODGING THE COMPLAINT OF THEFT IN THE POLICE STATION, WHAT ALL STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY.
satish
06 November 2009 at 11:12
RESPECTED SIRS ,
I HAVE SERVED A NOTICE TO THE PARTY FOR RETURNED CHEQUE u\s 138 AND ALSO WANT TO FILE A CASE AGAINST HIM AS I FEEL THAT HE HAS NOT TAKEN THE NOTICE SERIOUSLY AND WILL ALSO NOT APPEAR IN THE COURT FOR THE SAME ,THOUGH HE HAS A GOOD BUSINESS BUT HE DOES NOT SEEM TO PAY MY DUES .I AM FROM MUMBAI AND THE PARTY IS FROM KERALA.I WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENS IF HE DOES NOT ACCEPT THE SUMMONS OR HE DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE COURT ON THE SAID DATE ,EVEN IF A WARRANT IS ISSUED AGAINST HIM AND HE IS NOT PRESENT WHAT CAN I DO .DOES THE COURT GIVE ANOTHER DATE OF 4 TO 5 MONTHS TO PRESENT HIM IN COURT ,AND ALSO PLEASE GUIDE ME IF THE PARTY KEEPS ON DOING THE SAME THING AT EVERY DATE WHAT SHALL I DO.
THANKING YOU.
Pradeep Gupta
06 November 2009 at 11:02
I was married in 2007.
In the year 2002, My father-in-law has purchased a land and build a house in the name of his wife i.e my mother-in-law after taking home loan from Bank of Baroda for the tenor 10 years.
He have one son and one daughter (who is now my wife) and one grandson (from his son). His Son got married in the year 2005. In the year 2006, his son had left the home with his wife and son. Today, nobody knows where he, his wife and his son are located or we don't know their status, whether they are alive or dead.
In May 2009, My Father-in-law expired due to heart-attack and TB & in the same year i.e. Nov 2009, My Mother-in-Law also expired due to heart failure. They don't left any will behind. Also, now nobody is staying in that house.
Now, the question arise due to the property left behind. Still the Home Loan (around 75000/- ) is left in BoB. So, my question is, Shall my wife can acquire the property after completing the home loan? or what should be the procedure for acquiring the property & their household items.
queryking
06 November 2009 at 10:54
Dear most experts,
i have availed the loan from a finace company to purchase a four wheeler about 3 years back, they have taken my singnature to some forms(may be agreemnt), the contensts not disclosed to me, it is not explaned to me, they have taken 36 balnk cheques of my account, i regularly paid the installments(in some month little late than the fixed date), as per my calcutaltion i am due about Rs.40,000/-, but last month they have issued a notice demanding 1)amount outstanding Rs.80,000/- 2) future principal loan Rs.85059/-(What is future principal loan?) 3) Penallty on closure Rs 3,000/- 4) intervening fiance charges Rs.467/-
5) Additianl Finance Charges 43,000/- (what is additinal finance charges?) 6)Cheque return charges 4,500/-(event though few of the cheques are returned as soon after coming to know about the returning of the che cheque i paid the amount throgh the DD and i have the xerox copies of the DD),i ahve not replied to the demand notice.
few days back they sent a notice stating that there is a dispute between me and the fainace company hence they are referring the matter to sole arbitrator at Tamil nadu( it is not my native state) the transaction took place in my state. what course of action i have to take?
sudhakar s. yeradkar
06 November 2009 at 10:16
All respected experts from lawyersclubindia.
Thanks to all for kind support & immediate feedback & co-operation.
I am going to appear for 1st year LLB exam - 1st smstr in the month of April 10, as working student without attending lectures.
Please suggest me suitable books/authors with easy langauge to enable me to complite study within stipulated time.
rgds.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
sale deed cancellation
I filed a suit for specific performance against agreement to sell dated 27.06.87. Ex-party decree was past with direction to deposit remaining sale consideration of Rs. 95000/- with in 30 days. Suit for execution of sale deed was filed on 04-01-91, after notice and publication commissioner was pointed to registered sale deed which was registered on 06-09-91. Ex party decree was set aside on 12-11-94 and application for setting aside the ex-parte decree was given on 15/05/92. In which no prayer for cancellation of sale deed. Due to which sale deed till date is not cancelled by the civil court.Possesion is of land is still with me.
On the other hand after setting aside the ex party decree the case was re-trialed and i lost upto SPL in the apex court.
Now question arises that my sale deed is registered document and having legal value which has not been cancelled by any civil court so far. According to apex court judgment sale deed is a registered document and required to be cancelled by the civil court through declaration within the periods of three years as per limitation act 1963 article 59 and 113.
But on the other side opposite party claims that after the setting aside the exparty decree, the sale deed automatically become invalid or void. Please clarify,” that can a registered document become invalid automatically”?
On 15-05-1992 when the application for setting aside was submitted – the relief for -taking possession---cancellation of sale deed ---and setting aside ex-party decree were available, but he sought only setting aside ex-party as court fees was involved in other reliefs. Can the remaining relief are barred under ORDER 2 RULE 2 CPC and limitation and can not claim at this point of time.