Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 22:40
Respected Experts,
I had purchased one microtek inverter from Patna, some 5 yrs back by paying Rs. 3600/. The wave form on that it works is “tpzi”. At that time they convinced that it is a latest technology, which gives far more battery backup and only Microtek is having this technology, it is best in this class of Inverters. Contrary to that most of the electrical appliances works on “sine wave”. I started using it, within a month, tube light set with choke got fused. Other appliances like fan etc. were making noise. So, I packed the Inverter. After some time I asked to other Microtek dealer about this problem. He said to me that the wave form “tpzi” that your inverter is based on is not good for electrical appliances having windings, only “CFL” can be used and now company has stopped producing/manufacturing it and now only pure sine wave inverter are being produced/manufactured. Now some months back I wanted to clarify this from the company by sending mail, also whether it can be converted to sine wave or not. They replied diplomatically that “It cannot be converted to “sine wave”. But they are silent on its’ harmful effects on electrical appliances having windings. Now I am not using that inverter due to fear. What should I do? Plz. Suggest. My thanks to all.
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 22:26
my relative is govt emp .and he is charged with IPC409 and disputed amount is 12L .he is in jail and his family is not having any document all document is in office only which is in hand of that person who large the FIR as he was head of department .now how to get any help from department.
and bail application is alreday rejected from ADJ. now his family wan to move highcourt but problem is same from where they should get evidance and can they go for bail application again infront of ADJ?
Arati Gawde
05 March 2010 at 22:05
Is it necessary that Brokerage Agreement shall be register ? What point shall be cover if transaction for immovable property (Agricultural) ?
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 21:27
the assessee had suffered from Hypertension & Ischaemic Heart Disease and therefore (Angioplasty) PTCA with Stent to LM done. and the assessee claims for amount of Rs. 134820/- towards expenses incurred tor this medical treatement. and he reimbursed such amount from his employer.
Now whether the total amount of Rs. 134820/- is exempt from tax because such amount is incurred for heart deases.
if it is exepmt, under which section?
please give details urgently.
I want to know that whether Medical Rembarsement u/s. 17(2), and as per Income Tax rule 3A-2(d) is exempt ? please advise me urgently
darshan
05 March 2010 at 20:50
Sir, please tell me that, the Sumputary allowance given to judges for incurring expenses on Hospitality is exempt or not? and also washing allowance is exempt or not?
under Income tax Act 1961.
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 20:18
one of my relative is charded in 409IPC and f Bail application has been rejected from ADJ Court, is there any way to do compromise with opposite part(i.e state Govt) and get out from this case.
Disputed amount is around 12L.
Is there any legal process of compromise?
ravi anu ramraika
05 March 2010 at 20:16
sir,i ask income tax written of one person,under new ruling of rti india,but informasion officer of income tax department give a notice that person for no objection,but surely,he object and officer reject my application,then now i want go to appel, ........................... sir,,, i want new ruling of rti india, pls help me,send that ruling ,, jismain abhi 25 din pahle rti india nai faisla diya hai ki income tax return ab rti ke dayare main hai,, ya yah ruling kaha milegi,help me
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 20:01
my query is that there are specific sections mentioned in sec.82(4)crpc. for example ec.279ipc is not mentioned in sec.82(4).whether an accused u/s279ipc can be declared as po
harish
05 March 2010 at 19:58
my query is - for example a juvenile of 17 years committed an offence. thereafter he tried by the board under juvenile act.when the decision of board came accused becomes more than 18 years. which means now he is no more juvenile as per the definition of juvenile under the act. now the question arises whether that person can be inflicted with any of the punishments under sec. 15 of the juvenile justice act.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Partition
Thanks sir. But could you please give me further clarification on the matter.