Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Nirmaan Shyamsukha   11 March 2010 at 16:11

Re presentation of Bounced Cheque

can a bounced cheque on account of closed account can be presented again for the purpose of filing case under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

can a bounced cheque on account of closed account can be presented again ?

Anonymous   11 March 2010 at 16:11

marriage

Dear Experts,

I have a situation where in, me and my girlfriend are thinking to get married- now her dad is in police and they have threatened to make our life hell if we do so,same is the case with my parents, we both are Hindus but from different casts, she is locked in her house and we intend to elope, kindly help me out with all the legal and best possible way to get married.

kindly hurry up.

S.Sabarinadh   11 March 2010 at 15:13

Defenition

Is there anything in the General clauses act,Indian constitution,contempt of courts act, any other act,any precedent by the SC where plainly the word 'COURT' is defined?????????????????????????????
its is an appealing point that the word 'COURT' has been plainly used in many of the acts without having any sort of defenition as its backbone creating confusions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(Mines and minerals regulation act-ENTRY NO:90 of ninth schedule)

SATYANARAYANA K   11 March 2010 at 14:46

Arbitration Urgent Please

"A" & "B" are Brother, "A" have participated in Chits hence "A" good reputation in the Chit Fund Finance Co, but poor person.

Actually money required to "B" but did not participate in any Chits.

Believed the version of "B". my client is "A" took Personal Loan and executed Agreement cum Hypothycation. while taking cheque from the company, agents gave Chaque to "B" in Hotel not in Office. "B" & Chit Fund Finance Co agents colluded each other cheated my client.

In that agreement "B" kept sign a Guarantor and also "B" arranged "C" as Guarantor "C" is State Government Employee. in that agreement "B" & "C" as Guarantors, but "B" did not took Arbitration Notice intentionally.

"A" took Arbitration notice and approached me for justice. i know "A" since long time but poor, now i wanted to save his life and family.

Please give guidance, how to save "A" in the Arbitration proceedings. and how to prove the guilty of "B". and also did not took notice intentionally.

Now "A" position is cannot pay single Rupee. if not pay

My Query is then what will be actions taken by the Arbitrator please give advise, i am waiting for your valuable replies.

Jayesh   11 March 2010 at 14:45

Interception of mobile

My wife had a affair with my friend. I have filed a divorce case. My friend planted spyware into my and my wife's mobile. he heared all our communication. under which law this is an offence and what should i do to get mobile print out of my friend, myself and my wife.

Himanshu   11 March 2010 at 14:27

Working hours for Driver or Security Guard

Whether any person working as Driver or Security Guard can work for 12 hours in a day and 6 days in a week.

Please advice.

Himanshu   11 March 2010 at 14:22

Transfer of flat in the name of wife on death of her husband

One person has purchased flat in Dombivali, Maharashtra in 1992 but proper stamp duty was not paid at that time and the agreement was not registered. Now that person has died last month. As per his will (not registered) property has to be transfered in the name of his wife and even in the nomination form filed in society of the building, name of his wife has mentioned.

Now for tranfering that flat in the name of his wife (1) whether Probat is required because property is within the jurisdiction of Bombay High Court and (2) whether registered document with proper stamp duty paid will be required to submit to society. If yes, which document has to be stamped and registered.

Please advice.

PV RANGAIAH   11 March 2010 at 13:54

FELLING OF TREES IN LARGE SCALE IN TAMILNADU

Whether felling of trees in large scale is permitted in Tamilnadu. If yes, what are the procedure to be followed and documents to be furnished and fees payable, to whom to send the application for permission?

anupam sharma   11 March 2010 at 13:45

undivided share

7 persons have an undivided share in property which they intend to sell.Is only one agreement to sell is required of 7 agreements would have to be made??

Also will the rights of seller be affected if the demarcation of the land is done before the registration of the sale deed???

if the possession of the said land is given to the seller before such demarcation then will it be lawful ??

Ananthakrishna P.U.   11 March 2010 at 13:31

Hindu Succession Act 1956

There is HUF in Karnataka (Mithakshari)consiting of Father, Mother, 2 daughters and a son having immovable agricultral property. First daughter married in 13.06.1994. Second Daughter Married in May 2001. Both of them given a GPA(unregistered) to the father releasing their rights. First daughter given GPA on 10.04.2002 and Second daughter given GPA on 26.02.2002. Lateron on 15.04.2005 partition (registered) taken place dividing properties between the Father and Son. The Intention is to transfer all the properties to the son. So majority of the properties are transferred to the son and only a small portion is with the father. It is mentioned in the deed that after the death of the father, the father's share should go to the mother and after the death of the mother same should go to the son. In partition deed it is mentioned the first daughter does not have right since she married on 13.06.1994. Now the questions are:

1) Is the daughters can claim back their right over the property again. The doubts arised since; a) partition after 20.12.1994, b) The first daugher is not part of partition deed since married on 13.06.1994. However, whether the the cut off date of marriage sometime in June 1994 is applicable in Karnataka or only in Maharashtra. c) The GPA's are unregistered.

My belief is that even though the partition taken place after 20.12.2005, since the daughters released their rights prior to that date (in 2002), they dont have the right again and partition is valid.