rdburmanmusic
08 June 2010 at 17:14
my worst wife has filed 498a case against me my family members and my doctor collegue who is never in picture but counselled her once to improve her behaviour.if that case proved out to be false( off course it vl be false only)can my friend put defamation case against her and her parents who is supporting her .i want to live separatelt from her and to be alone from her cruelity but she is not vacating house after putting 498a.worst shameless female want to torture me till i get divorce. how to escape from her?how to makw seperate residence for me? can i take my things and go?she is doctor can work and live seperately but she is not working, want exploit my money and torture me in same house. her father is more worst fellow has only revenge attitude. he is govt employee doctor, how to teach him lesson?pls advice me.
P.Balasubramaniam
08 June 2010 at 17:12
Dear Sirs,
One of my client intented to purchase two different properties. When I scrutinising the documents, I have got some clarifications.
a. First item of property and its larger extent was purchased by one Ramasamy during the year 1965. He settled the portion of the property to his Minor son Ramesh through his junior wife Latha in the year 1976. The settlor gives only life interest to his junior wife and his minor son, the absolute right goes to the male legal heirs (Grand sons of the Ramasamy) of his minor son Ramesh. The settlor Ramasamy died in the year 1978. His son Ramesh died in the year 1987 as unmarried. The said Ramesh got four married sisters. His mother Latha filed a suit against the Tahsildar, to declare that she is the only legal heir. The suit is decreed as prayed for in the year 2008. The said Latha sold the said property in favour of the present owner. Further the said Latha died in the year 2009. My clarification is that both the Mother and Son have got only life interest, then how she sold the property without obtaining signatures from the other legal heirs of the settlor. Is it valid sale transaction. I request the learned seniors advocates to guide me in this matter with suitable case laws.
b. Likewise, the second item of property and its larger extent was purchased by one Murugan during the year 1975. He died intestate in the year 1979 leaving behind his senior wife, junior wife, 2 sons and 2 daughters through his senior wife, 1 sons and 3 daughters through his junior wife. The said legal heirs partitioned their properties during the year 1983. Under the said partition F Schedule property was allotted to his Junior wife and her son for their life interest and their life time the property shall be goes his (son's) male heirs. The said died in the year 1987 as unmarried leaving behind his mother as his Class I legal representative. His mother filed a suit against the Tahsildar, to declare that she is the only legal heir. The suit is decreed as prayed for in the year 2007 and his mother sold the said property in favour of the present owner. Further she died in the year 2008. My clarification is that both the Mother and Son have got only life interest, then how she sold the pproperty. Is it valid sale transaction. I request the learned seniors advocates to guide me in this matter with case laws.
With Regards,
P.Balasubramaniam
lokanadham c
08 June 2010 at 17:12
sir,
whether stranger can locus standy to question the management transactions of private trust ?
ravi gupta
08 June 2010 at 16:55
sir,
we have a land in raipur(cg).one party in 1997 forge a agreement of sell of land,we won the case from two lower court on time bar basis,the case is now in highcourt.
IN 2008 we done a agreement to sell the land to some other party,specifying in the agreement that a case is pending in high court & regigtry will be done done after the court judgement.no time duration is mention in agreement,agreement is on simple green paper & not notorized on the assurance of buying party verbally that he will settle the matter in two three month,
now the almost two & half years is lapsed & buying party did not taking interest in
deal,their intention is that to grab the land by just by paying half of the amount.
they are offering half amount now on registry & post dated cheque for balance amount which can be realise only after the highcourt judgement.
IN BETWEEN THE PERSON (THE SELLER)WHO DONE
THE AGREEMENT DIED IN AUG 2009 & LAND IS NOW TRANSFERED IN THE NAME OF THEIR LEGAL HEIR.
KINDLY ADVICE ME WHAT SELLER PARTY CAN DO IN THIS MATTER.IS AGREEMENT HAS ANY LEGAL
BINDING ON SELLER HEIR,
Sajid
08 June 2010 at 16:51
Please let us know, how to defend the cheque bounce case. what r the key points to prepare to save our clients from the negotiable instrument dishonour(cheque).
Anonymous
08 June 2010 at 16:46
Hi,
I got Sale Deed with X with Y consentors.
Now i waana Consent for the same property with remaning Z consentors.
What shall i make consent Deed Or Memorandum of Understanding or any other document plese suggest?
Shall i registor it or make notary on stamp paper ?
Sumir
08 June 2010 at 16:42
Outside police station, its written, if complaint not registered approach....list of higher officer and in end, name and address of Human rights commission, I did so, so now, Human rights commission has asked for an affidavit, can any one tell me how to file affidavit or what are the steps in filing affidavit?
aditya gupta
08 June 2010 at 15:32
i am writing an article on the theme PROTECTION OF SCHEDULED TRIBES: PROMISE & PERFORMANCE... what do the the words 'promise and performance' exactly mean and imply? does it mean the promises that have been made by the constitution and the performance of those promises? or does it mean the promises that should be made and performed to improve their condition?
please put in your suggestion as i am in need of help...
AJAY KUMAR
08 June 2010 at 15:15
Hello Friends,
I need your valueable advice on the below mentioned subject:-
I was in CISF (Central Industrial Security Force) and resigned on 3rd March 2006 (Wage revision was Due from 1.1.2006) and joined BEML LIMITED (a Govt Undertaking PSU under MInistry of Defence).
They protected my Salary in the old Scale (Here Wage Revision due from 1.1.2007).
In 2008 Central Govt. Announce the wage revision from 1.1.2006. I put up my application in BEML to protect my salary as per Last Drawn Salary, which i received from CISF on the basis of 6th Wage revision. BEML Mgmt informed me that they will protect my salary later. In Nov 2009 Govt declared PSU wage revision. Now they are saying you will not get the PSU wage revision and they will protect my last Drawn Salary from 1.1 2007 on Notional Basis and even we will not get the Arear for the 2006 as their was the difference of salary after wage revision in Central Govt. and PSU salary during 2006. They are telling you will be double benfited, if we will protect your salary from 1.1.2006 and again revise the same on 1.1.2007.
My Question:- I have resigned Central Govt in Feb 2006 (i.e after wage revision) and joined BEML FEB 2006 ( before wage Revision in PSU due on 1.1.2007). I want to Know whether i can get the pay protection from the date of my Joining (i.e 6th Feb 2006) and also can i get the PSU wage revision from 1.1. 2007 (it gives me double benefit).
Please guide me if any Law is their to protect the Last Drawn Salary. As they have already refused me to protect my salary from the date of my Joining in PSU.
Others, who joined from the same organisation (CISF) after 1.1.2007 has been protected as per their last Drawn salary. They also get the Arears for 2006 in CISF.
Regards
AJAY KUMAR "
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Diffandants
Dear Experts , I was suit filed in district court for interim injenction & partition suit of agricultural lands , the court was sended summons & notices to the 32 diffandants illegal defendants enchrochers on my said patta lands , but the diffandants was not come forwarded to the court they denied the court notices & summons & they not subbmitted any documents to the said lands ,know can my case will stands in the court or it will be dissolved ? next what can i do for the case matter ,kindly give suzesstion to my problem the case has postphoned on 17th of this month this is second hearing on 17th
of this month kindly give me suzessition to my problem ,thanking you sir .