amol
21 March 2025 at 08:59
Hello Sir/Madam,
I have purchased under construction flat 2 years back in Satara Maharashtra
I have paid 100% demand then I received flat keys but not yet received possession letter.
But builder issuing me possession letter 6 month back date.
Should I accept this possession letter with 6 month back date after OC issued? Any cons for it?
Is possession letter mandatory if received keys?
Can filing in both consumer court and RARA simultaneously allowed for wrong date of possession letter?
Which one is fastest between consumer court OR RERA to get order?
Sandip Das
20 March 2025 at 23:16
If there is a "simple injury" of a bike rider resulting from a minor collision (unintentional) with a car, will it qualify for rash and negligent driving as per BNS 125(a)?
chinu
20 March 2025 at 09:32
I have to take a 3bhk flat on rent in Bengaluru for Rs 38,500. In all my previous agreements, consideration price is mentioned as Rs 0, whereas the vendor for making agreement is telling us to write consideration price as Rs 4,000.
What should be the consideration price for this and is this of any importance to me.
What exactly is meant by consideration price?
Is there any importance of mentioning this?
Amit Jaiswal
19 March 2025 at 19:34
mere uper gharelu hinsa ki dhara 31 ke tahat case kiya gya hai ki main gharelu hinsa ke tahat diye gaye gujara bhatta nhi de raha hoon . jbaki order me dhara 18 ke antargat koi bhi order nhi hai to dhara 31 mujh par kaise lagu ho sakti hai. kripya jbab den
Anonymous
19 March 2025 at 18:55
I bought the flat and get it registered. I took the loan from bank. I received the photocopy of my registry and was told that original registry will be submitted to the bank. After this event within a week builder office got sealed by Govt. now after 10 years when I went to pay off my loan and get the registry papers bank said that they never received the original registry papers. I asked bank that why they had not notified me. They accepted the loop hole and agreed to get me the true copy of papers along with bank letter. They are also pushing to get the permission to get access to builder office and get the original papers too.
My query is
1) Is true copy along with bank letter is ok to sale my property
2) Is it possible that using my registry papers builder could have taken loan from some bank
3) what should be my actions
Balaji Bakthavathsal
19 March 2025 at 08:10
Dear learned Lawyers,
In a Civil Appeal suit, I am one of the respondent. The Appeal suit was filed in the year 2019 and it is being dragged by the Appellant counsel for more than 6 year by filing flimsy IA petitions one after the other. Recently on 1st Feb. 2025, a petition under the Order 41 Rule 25 was submitted by the Appellant counsel which got rejected by the District judge. Now the judge retired and new judge has taken over. Again the appellant counsel submitted a petition under the same Order 41 Rule 25 on 18th March 2025 which again got rejected by the new district judge. What course of action can be taken against such abuse of process of law ?
Thanks & Regards
Balaji
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/ask_query.asp
Anonymous
18 March 2025 at 18:57
As per, GST Notification No.12/2017 (Sr.No.77),as per these circulars, GST is applicable only if BOTH conditions are met simultaneously:
1. The society's annual turnover exceeds ₹20 lakhs, and
2. The monthly maintenance charges per member exceeds ₹7500.
Lets consider this QUATERLY Bill charged by our Society:
Maintenance Charges --> 5100
Sinking Fund --> 75
Repairs & Maintenance Fund --> 225
Major Repair Fund --> 255
Others - GST --> 100
Total --> 5755
As per the circulars mentioned above, the TOTAL amount is less than the monthly exemption of 7500/- and hence should be exempted. But the society has come up this theory that the exemption applies to Maintenance charges ie 5100 and not to the other service heads like Sinking funds, Repairs & Maintenance Fund & Major Repair Fund, and hence they are charging us since many years now.
Need clarification on this:
1) Does the exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), Entry 77(c), which states that services provided by a Residential Welfare Association (RWA) or Co-operative Housing Society are exempt from GST if the monthly contribution per member is below ₹7,500, include charges like Sinking Fund, Repairs & Maintenance Fund, and Major Repair Fund?
2) Or, do these funds (Sinking Fund, Repairs & Maintenance Fund, Major Repair Fund) fall under GST even if the total monthly bill is below ₹7,500?
Please help.
Chetan Bv
18 March 2025 at 01:27
Dear Sir,
A property has been sold and registered to us in June 2016, without bringing to our knowledge that it is in litigation, and in July 2016 after just one month, the developer has filed Original Suit against another party for Title of the land in question. this case has ran till December 2024 and Disposed off with status of Uncontested abated.
1) Please let me know, can we take grounds of Lis Pendens to recover back our money, considering our registration date is very close but one month before the Original Suit is filed. Any citations to this effect will be really helpful.
2) Since the 10th year is running since registration, are we under the time limit to file case.
Dilip Patel
17 March 2025 at 16:46
My father and we 3 brothers with two others as witness, signed property division agreement in 1999, without consent or signature of my 2 sisters(Names are not mentioned in the document). This is unregistered document. In 2010, after death of father in 2001, all names of mine and my siblings were entered in 7/12. Does any one of them can claim part of property(Share), accordingly mentioned in this document?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ipc 325 apeal
मैंने अपनी पत्नी द्वारा लगाए गए धाराओं 498A और 325 IPC के तहत केस में न्यायिक प्रक्रिया का सामना किया है। इसमें, धारा 498A के मामले में मैं और मेरा परिवार बरी हो चुके हैं, लेकिन IPC की धारा 325 में मुझे दोषी ठहराकर सजा सुनाई गई।
इस मामले में, जब मेरी पत्नी की मेडिकल लीगल रिपोर्ट (MLC) तैयार की गई, तब डॉक्टर ने उसकी कोहनी में किसी भी प्रकार की चोट का उल्लेख नहीं किया था और न ही एक्स-रे कराने की सलाह दी थी। इसके बावजूद, एक्स-रे कराया गया, और एक्स-रे करने वाले डॉक्टर ने भी यह स्पष्ट नहीं किया कि फ्रैक्चर कितना पुराना था। इस फैसले के खिलाफ मैंने अपील दायर की थी, लेकिन अपीलीय न्यायालय ने डॉक्टर के बयान को गलत तरीके से पढ़ा और माना कि डॉक्टर ने एक्स-रे कराने की सलाह दी थी। क्योंकि यह मेरा प्रथम अपराध था, तो कोर्ट ने मेरी सजा को घटाकर ‘कोर्ट उठने तक’ कर दिया, लेकिन मुझे दोषमुक्त नहीं किया।
इसके बाद, मेरी पत्नी ने घरेलू हिंसा का मामला फिर से दायर किया, जबकि पहले दो बार उसका घरेलू हिंसा का मामला खारिज हो चुका था। IPC की धारा 325 में दोष सिद्ध होने के आधार पर न्यायालय ने घरेलू हिंसा को प्रमाणित माना और मेरी पत्नी द्वारा दायर धारा 125 CrPC के अंतर्गत भरण-पोषण की राशि को सीधे नौ हजार रुपये से बढ़ाकर तीस हजार रुपये कर दिया।
मैं इस तीस हजार रुपये की राशि देने में असमर्थ हूँ, जिसके कारण मेरे खिलाफ DV Act की धारा 31 के तहत भी मामला दर्ज कर दिया गया है।
IPC की धारा 325 में जो फैसला फरवरी 2020 में आया था, उसके खिलाफ मैंने उच्च न्यायालय में अपील दायर की है, जिसमें देरी को माफ करने के लिए "Condonation of Delay" की अर्जी भी दी गई है। क्या अदालत मुझे IPC 325 से दोषमुक्त करेगी, और यदि ऐसा होता है तो क्या घरेलू हिंसा के मामले में IPC 325 में दोषी माने जाने के आधार पर जो भरण-पोषण की राशि बढ़ाई गई थी, वह खारिज हो जाएगी या नहीं।
मैं इस मामले में न्याय की अपेक्षा करता हूँ और उचित मार्गदर्शन की आशा करता हूँ।