LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Rakesh Kumar   16 January 2009 at 09:52

building bylaws applicable in Haryana

Dear Members,

Please help what are the applicable building by laws applicable in Haryana.

What are IDC Charges & EDC Charges taken by the builders.

Regards,
Kumar

Legal Fighter   16 January 2009 at 09:27

Time Limitation U/s 468 CrPC

how does time limitation apply to an FIR u/s 498/406 which is under investigation and the accused is on interim bail for past more than 2 years. most of the incidents mentioned in the FIR have already been more than 3 years old. does it mean that if the police takes 1 more year to file chargesheet, the case will be barred due to time limitation. Or this time limitation is not applicable to the priod of investigation or the Anticipatory Bail proceedings which are already going on in high court.

kindly help me understnading time limitation u/s 468 CrPC.

suchitra   15 January 2009 at 23:33

small scale industries registration in karnataka


Dear sir,

Please let me know the procedures of
small scale industries registration
in karnataka.

M.A.T.Ganesan   15 January 2009 at 23:07

employment

Can a person of Indian origin, having American citizenship get employment and work in India?

Jainodin shaikh   15 January 2009 at 22:52

Cr.P.C. 207

Is it compulsory to comply with the provision of sec. 207 of Cr.P.C. (regarding to supply of documents and statements recorded in inquiry to the accused person) in a private complaint not excusively triable by the Cour of Sessions?

Kamlesh soni   15 January 2009 at 22:13

about solisiters

Respected sir, my edu.quali. is B.Sc. L.L.B now work as a advocate in mehsana District court. what i have to do if i want to be soliciter. and please modify the difference between advocate and soliciter if possible.

vinod bansal   15 January 2009 at 21:48

recent criminal law Amendment bill 2008

Plz anyone provide me detail of recent amendments in IPC,Crpc,Indian Evidence Act passed by indian parliament on 12-12-08

S.B.adil rahman   15 January 2009 at 21:41

On section 197 Crpc regarding sanction for the prosecution of Public servants.

The apex court decided the case of sanction for the prosecution of a public servant vide the below referred case on 7.1.2009. Can any one post the text of the judgement/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2009

@ S.L.P. (Crl.) NO.2864 of 2007

Choudhury Parveen Sultana Vs. State of West Bengal and Another


ALTAMAS KABIR, J. & MARKANDEY KATJU, J.


Dated : 07.01.2009

adil/Kolkata

SUNDEEP   15 January 2009 at 14:20

Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996

To all Happy New Year
I was working with a company with whom at the time of joining I have signed an agreement on company letter head where one clause was that in case of dispute the arbitrator shall be appointed by the chairman of the company. Later on teh company has broke teh agreement signed tehrefore I also quit the company. Now the company is allegating me for broking he agreement. When I refused to pay for the compensation the company suo moto has appointed an arbitrator. I dont know what is the fees amount to be paid or what is the agreement with the company for such appointment. Now I have received a letter from the arbitrator that the 50% of the arbitrator has to be paid by me.
My stand is that the appointment of arbitrator is without my knowledge. The only letter recieved by me was that when the arbitrator has already been appointed. Also I dont know the fee to be paid to arbitrator. So how can i be made responsible for paying cost of arbitration.
Is thia true that the party seeking arbitration has to pay the cost of arbitration. There was no such clause in joining agreement as to cost of arbiration, i.e. who will bear the cost.
Can any body suggest me or the reference to act or relevant case law or section applicable to such situation.

I will wait for reply.
Thanks


M.S.Chandra Shekar   15 January 2009 at 13:14

Whether Registration Department Fraud comes under CID Scanner

A Exhibit in favour of the Defendent was manipulated in a Civil Case by the Registration Department. The civil case was decreed against the defendant. After that a Complaint to the CID was filed during 1980's, then the CID took up the case and due to some excuse from the registration depatment that the records are in some other court, the investigation was closed.

In 2007 the same exhibit was challenged by the Defendant in the High Court, The Registration Department failed to contest and the Hon'ble High Court gave the order in favour of the defendant/petitioner.

Now I (Defendant / petitioner) have filed a complaint to CID that there investigation was never complete and again ask them to conduct the investigation.

The CID Department in the current year comes out with a reply that they are not responsible to investigate Civil Matters.

Is this statement of CID Deparment is correct ?