jayesh
16 March 2009 at 11:57
draft of writ petition challenging order of acquistion of land situated at passik passed by nashik land acquistion officer, nashik
Member (Account Deleted)
16 March 2009 at 11:48
Sec. 33.Advocates alone entitled to practice: Except as otherwise provided in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, no person shall, on or after the appointed day, be entitled to practise in any court or before any authority or person unless he is enrolled as an advocate under this Act.
Sec. 45.Penalty for persons illegally practising in courts and before other authorities: Any person who practises in any court or before any authority or person, in or before whom he is not entitled to practise under the provisions of this Act, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months.
These are sections of Advocate Act. Followings are my questions;
Whether a person who is not an Advocate neither LLB can provide legal advise/opinion in consideration of money? If he is not practicing before any court?
In abovementioned sections what is the exact meaning of “practice”? Whether the term includes practice in court only?
jayesh
16 March 2009 at 11:37
Draft a complaint with appropriate relief in a proper Court for dishonour of a
cheque of Rs. 50,000 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on
assumed facts.
jayesh
16 March 2009 at 11:36
Draft a complaint with appropriate relief in a proper Court for dishonour of a
cheque of Rs. 50,000 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on
assumed facts.
jayesh
16 March 2009 at 11:23
i need urgently application draft for " return of stolen property " which is recovered by the police station
jayesh
16 March 2009 at 11:23
i need urgently application draft for " return of stolen property " which is recovered by the police station
jayesh
16 March 2009 at 11:22
i need urgently application draft for " return of stolen property " which is recovered by the police station
imthiyaz
16 March 2009 at 10:51
Dear All,
In our muslim family partition suit dated 1949, which is decreed in 1970, with 11 decree holders,
And the suit is pending in Final decree proceedings now and is adjourned for next month,
After the preliminary decree, some of the defendants have sold the decree schedule properties with out the knowledge of plaintiffs,
And now, Some LR’s of defendants and plaintiff’s have colluded and has executed one out of court panchayat farikhat paper or partition paper for some of the decree schedule properties withut authorization of other LR’s and has approached the Tahsildar to change khata based on that paper,
For which there is case adjourned in tahsildar court, we attended the case last hearing and informed tahsildar that theses properties are also schedule properties of the decree for which the suit is pending in the court,
But the tahsildar is not willing to listen to us he says these people have applied for khata change, I will change it even though the case is pending,
How to prevent Tahsildar from changing Khata.
Or advocate says we cannot make Tahsildar party and ask for stay in court until he writes an order.
We want a stay on on all the decree schedule properties, But our advocate says it is a old suit, court will think we are trying to delay it purposely.
How to proceed..
Gaurav Nanda
16 March 2009 at 07:48
Hi can a person who has done B.A. do LLB after the age of 52 (almost close to be becoming a senior citizen) and then after completing his 3 year law degree practice after 55?
I read somewhere that delhi HC allowed joining of LLB course even for senior citizens but now i am hearing verbally that SC has overturned this, but i am not sure that these r rumors or truth. Please clarify the current status.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
writ format
A who is wanted by police station in a case of murder is absoconding. the police detained his mother hoping that "A" would surrender. i need a sample draft of writ petition ...