
Anonymous
18 December 2010 at 10:00
Petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of IPC.
I REQUEST ALL THE HARASSED HUSBANGS AND THE ORGANISATIONS WORKING FOR THEM TO SEND IN YOUR STRONG AND POWERFULLY WORDED OPINIONS TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN HEREUNDER AND VOICE YOUR OPPOSITION AGAINST:
1) THE ERRING WIVES MISUSING THE LAWS
2) PAYMENT OF HUGE MAINTANANCE AMOUNTS TO THE ERRING WIVES (AT NO TIME AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE THE AMOUNT SHOULD NEVER CROSS THE 1/10TH OF THE NET SALARY OF THE HUSBAND)
3) THE PARTIAL AND INSENSITIVE FAMILY COURT JUDGES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY
**********
The Committee on Petitions of the Rajya Sabha, under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, Member, Rajya Sabha, is considering a petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner in his petition has pointed out the extensive abuse and misuse of this provision of the Penal Code. According to the petitioner, the abused population undergoes tremendous harassment and torture. As these provisions of the penal code presently go, a complaint without much authenticity or any weight of evidence is enough to arrest the husband or the in-laws or anyone else named in the complaint, irrespective of whether any crime has taken place or not. The petitioner, accordingly, has prayed for suitable modification in section 498A of Penal Code so as to check its abuse and protect the interest of innocent persons.
2. The petition is available on the Rajya Sabha's website (www.rajyasabha.nic.in) under the link: Committees → Standing Committees → Committee on Petitions → Petitions with the Committee.
3. The Committee has decided to undertake consultations with a wide cross-section of the society and invites written memoranda thereon. Those desirous of submitting memoranda to the Committee may send two copies (each in English and Hindi) thereof to Shri Rakesh Naithani, Joint Director, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, Parliament House Annexe, New Delhi – 110 001 (Tel: 011-23035433(O), 23794328 (Telefax) and E-mail: rsc2pet@sansad.nic.in) latest by 30th December, 2010.
4. Comments/suggestions, etc. submitted to the Committee would form part of its record and would be treated as confidential. Any violation in this regard may attract breach of privilege of the Committee.
5. Those who are willing to appear before the Committee besides submitting written comments/suggestions may indicate so. However, the Committee’s decision in this regard shall be final.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source : Rajya Sabha Web-site - http://164.100.47.5/newcommittee/Petitions/Committee%20on%20Petitions/498%20IPC%20English.pdf
Nyaayapriya
18 December 2010 at 09:53
Will anybody please get the phone number and email address to contact the organisers of the very significant seminar of 498A at Bangalore to be held on Dec.24 immediately and oblige
Ajit
17 December 2010 at 15:59
Can anyone provide me the copy of notification that discloses current rate of land (agricultural or non-agricultural) for registration purposes in Haryana.

Anonymous
17 December 2010 at 15:13
There are two component of minimum wages - BASIC (Rs 90) & DA (Rs 10). Can we give this Rs. 100 as BASIC (Rs.50) & HRA (Rs 20) & Conveyance (Rs 10) & Other allowance (Rs 20). So we have to pay PF only for Rs 50/-. Pl guide.
raghavendra
17 December 2010 at 11:32
sir
there 8 guntas land in one sarvey number , and also in one RTC ,i want to buy 2 guntas land from that ,can i buy 2 guntas , or is there any condition that ,minimum 5 guntas should buy from one RTC ,
that is NA land can i buy in my name ,i dont have any property in my name, even my father
SURIYAPRAKASH.P
17 December 2010 at 11:28
Dear All.
Is there any updated DA for Dyeing Industry (processing Unit). Need Help!!!! Tamilnadu minimum wages having some DA for the above industry in 2010. need Immediate help. for the DATA any one help to me.??

Anonymous
17 December 2010 at 09:11
Dear All,
Please send me Punjab public holidays list notified by punjab govt.
Regards,
Krishna Rao

Anonymous
16 December 2010 at 15:34
I WANT INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT IS THE DATE FOR RESTORATION OF COMMUTED PART OF PENSION?
IS IT DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF DATE OF RETIREMENT OR DATE OF GETTING FIRST PENSION OR DATE OF RECEIVING LUMPSUM AGAINST COMMUTED PART O PENSION?
PLEASE GIVE THE REFERENCE OF RULES APPLICABLE.
sanatana
15 December 2010 at 17:38
Will creation of Sole Proprietorship or Partnership Firm be able to provide 5 or 10 years business visa for US citizen? Has anyone dealt with client from US who received 5 or 10 years business visa?
Thanks.

Anonymous
15 December 2010 at 15:18
Hi, I am from Mumbai. I have taken a home loan from Citi bank. They told me that they would give me the loan with which i will also have to take a life insurance policy of equivalent amount. They bought a policy from MAX New York Life Insurance which was unit linked. I took that policy and also home loan. Policy was for 3 years, unit linked, after which i will get amount after 5 years. However, they had misrepresented me the policy terms, charges, maturity amount, etc. which i got to knew from their customer care. The agents who sold me the policy has already left the company. Then i had been in contact with someone from max who told me that i will have to pay premium for 3 years otherwise the amount which i had paid till now (1.5 years) will be kept with MAX and policy will lapse. I want suggestion as to what i need to do now. Do i stop paying my home loan and then tell bank to dispute with MAX orelse any other option. Please assist...
What should i do. Any suggestions ... Should i stop paying my EMI's and let bank put a case on me so that i can explain everything to judge or should i put case on MAX. Also i would like to know how to case on Max. Any lawyer who deals with these types of cases ?
Thanks.
PLEASE SEND IN YOUR STRONG OPINIONS AGAINST PAYMENT OF HUGE MAINTANANCE AMOUNT TO THE ERRING WIFE
Petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of IPC.
I REQUEST ALL THE HARASSED HUSBANGS AND THE ORGANISATIONS WORKING FOR THEM TO SEND IN YOUR STRONG AND POWERFULLY WORDED OPINIONS TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN HEREUNDER AND VOICE YOUR OPPOSITION AGAINST:
1) THE ERRING WIVES MISUSING THE LAWS
2) PAYMENT OF HUGE MAINTANANCE AMOUNTS TO THE ERRING WIVES (AT NO TIME AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE THE AMOUNT SHOULD NEVER CROSS THE 1/10TH OF THE NET SALARY OF THE HUSBAND)
3) THE PARTIAL AND INSENSITIVE FAMILY COURT JUDGES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY
**********
The Committee on Petitions of the Rajya Sabha, under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, Member, Rajya Sabha, is considering a petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner in his petition has pointed out the extensive abuse and misuse of this provision of the Penal Code. According to the petitioner, the abused population undergoes tremendous harassment and torture. As these provisions of the penal code presently go, a complaint without much authenticity or any weight of evidence is enough to arrest the husband or the in-laws or anyone else named in the complaint, irrespective of whether any crime has taken place or not. The petitioner, accordingly, has prayed for suitable modification in section 498A of Penal Code so as to check its abuse and protect the interest of innocent persons.
2. The petition is available on the Rajya Sabha's website (www.rajyasabha.nic.in) under the link: Committees → Standing Committees → Committee on Petitions → Petitions with the Committee.
3. The Committee has decided to undertake consultations with a wide cross-section of the society and invites written memoranda thereon. Those desirous of submitting memoranda to the Committee may send two copies (each in English and Hindi) thereof to Shri Rakesh Naithani, Joint Director, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, Parliament House Annexe, New Delhi – 110 001 (Tel: 011-23035433(O), 23794328 (Telefax) and E-mail: rsc2pet@sansad.nic.in) latest by 30th December, 2010.
4. Comments/suggestions, etc. submitted to the Committee would form part of its record and would be treated as confidential. Any violation in this regard may attract breach of privilege of the Committee.
5. Those who are willing to appear before the Committee besides submitting written comments/suggestions may indicate so. However, the Committee’s decision in this regard shall be final.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source : Rajya Sabha Web-site - http://164.100.47.5/newcommittee/Petitions/Committee%20on%20Petitions/498%20IPC%20English.pdf