Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:27
R//members
I am in need of a citation in which benefit of non production of case property was given to accused.Thanx n Regards
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:26
Dear All
Can anyone suggest/provide me the draft for
“Undertaking by the company for non-involvement, non prosecution of any of its senior Members in customs duty evasion cases”.
Thanx in advance.. please provide..
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:21
What is the procedure to get registration under Customs by partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting of engineering goods where one of the partner is a foreigner(not NRI) with 50% capital contribution?
regards
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:19
Dear Sir
As per below links appears that as per supreme court no Excise duty applicable on Ayurvedic Medicines
1) parliamentoindia.nic.in
2) timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articles/ msid-1447233
3)www.business-standard.com/india/news/no-dutyayurvedic-medicine
Please reply me so that we can follow as per rules.
thanking you
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:18
dear sir'
Kindly email me the copy of the patna highcourt judgement oct. 2009 on enhancement of retirement age of college teachers. I failed to get the copy from the website of patna highcourt because i don't have any authentication no.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:17
Dear Sir,
Please send the following decision with details to me
1987(1)LS554
Thanking you, Sir,
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:15
The Amin is demanding the collection charges on a recovery certificate which has been withdrawn by the authority issuing that recovery certificate? Please cite the provisions relating recovery chages or collection charges?
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:13
I have posted a query on Transport Woes in the Expert's forum. The facts in the issue are very glaring that though every citizen is aware of the plight, no concrete steps have been initiated to set things in order. Public Interest Litigation do not necessarily yield the desired results to highlight the matters which are detrimental to Public Interest at large. My specific doubts are summed up as under:
(a) As in the case of high profile matters, under which circumstances the Court intervenes into the matters which are detrimental to public interests?
(b) What are the Constitutional provisions and obligations on the part of the Apex or High Courts to question the authority of the State ?
(c) Is there any Judicial Committee which monitors the matters which upset the peace and tranquility in the State on account of misdemeanors of Public Authorities?
(d) Are there any precedents which match the similar facts where interests of common citizens are protected by the intervention of Courts?
(e) Whether any High Court is vested with any constitutional powers to question the acts of the State in the absence of any Public Interest Litigation?
I need specific point-war guidance from the expert panel in the interest of Common Citizens.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:12
Hello everyone....
i wanted some brief information regarding the case STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. DR. PRAFULLA K.DESAI (2003) 4 SCC 601.
And i also wanted that how can i relate the above mentioned case with Article 21. of the Constitution Of India.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
SUB-TENANCY
WE ARE LANDLORDS OF A BUILDING WHERIN A TENANCY AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED IN 1998.THE MAIN TENANT HAS ON HIS FRONT PORTION OF SHOP TWO SMALL BAKDAS AND THE SAME WAS MENTIONED IN THE AGREEMENT(OF 1998).BOTH THIS BAKDAWALLAS PAY HIM RENT DIRECTLY.NOW THE MAIN TENANT WANTS TO SELL THE PREMISES,AND HE SAYS THAT LET THIS 2 BAKDAS REMAIN AND THAT I SHOULD TRANSFER TENANCY TO THIRD PARTY AND TAKE THE CONSIDERATION.IS THIS LEGALLY VIABLE?OR IF SURRENDER LETTERS ARE TO BE TAKEN WHAT CONTENTS SHOULD BE THERE AND WHETHER IT IS ADVISABLE TO REMOVE THE 2 BAKDAS AND THEN DO THE TRANSFER.PLS.ADVISE