Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:53
By a High Court Order in a company petition U/Sec 391 & 394 if one company got some immovable properties, there is no doubt that the particular company became the absolute owner and having good title over it. On the basis of the High Court order mutation in revinue records can be carried out.
Is it required or mandatory to register any document in the SRO for the purpose to create an entry in the record of SRO. If required what is the name of the document, why and what is the stamp duty.
Please suggest.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:51
Let me know the detailed procedure of Inter Unit Transfer (Excise point of view). I want to transfer the material manufactured in our unit to our subsidiary unit. Let me be aware of the formalities for the same like billing etc.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:50
what is the court fees i will have to pay to file a suit to cancel the "release deed" obtained from me fruadulently. i have paid Rs 25/- AS COURT FEE AS PER sec 24[d] of karnataka court fees @suits valuation act . I am not asking for pocession of the property,please let me know the actual court fees to be paid.
Thank you
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:47
Sam co. and ABC co. together have
about 45% of the existing market share in operating systems in the Europe. Sam
co. developed X-Operations bundled with software applications in
Games and the ABC co. developed Y-Operations bundled with software
applications in Entertainment for use in the Personal Computers. In order to enhance
their market share, these companies entered into an agreement on 1.11.2008 to
exclusively share the ‘interoperable’ properties, so that the user of X-Operations
can transfer data to Y-Operations and vice versa.
The Antitrust Division of the Europe Department of Justice initiated civil proceedings on
10.12.2008 against the Sam co. and abc co.. for indulging in
anticompetition and monopolistic activities by bundling software applications in the
operating systems and then entering into an agreement for exclusive sharing of
interoperable properties.
The Sam co. and ABC co. decided to sell their products in India
through their partly owned subsidiaries TC ltd and DC ltd
respectively (as in both the subsidiaries 20 percent of the equity shares were held
by Indians). Advertisements appeared in the print and electronic media highlighting
the features of X-Operations and Y-Operations and their exclusive
“interoperable” compatibility.
Simultaneously, the Government of India received a report from its Embassy in Europe informing about the harmful effects of X-Operations and Y-Operations
on the Indian market. The existing market players in India also petitioned
the Government of India and submitted that these operating systems will have a
prejudicial effect on their market share. In view of this, the Government of India acted
quickly and promulgated an ordinance on 1.1.2009 which was replaced by
an Act of the Parliament viz. Prohibition of the Entry and Sales of X-Operations
and Y-Operations Act, 2009 banning the entry and sales including
licensing for a period of 2 years.
I just want to know….
1.Whether, the Parliament has competency to pass the Act of 2009?
2. whether, the above Act violates article 14,19 and 21 of constitution?
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:43
Dear Mr. RR Krishna, Mr B K R Rao and Mr. K Thadhani kindly refer my quary regarding corporate law posted on 12.02.2010. Many many thanks for your kind suggestion. Trust to get support in future also.Mr. Thadhani as you advised to get involved with reputed corporate law firm in this concern would like tell you that i have tried a lot but the firm which have agreed to retain me have provided very negligible ctc as compared to the present. But i shall try a lot so long i get a better because i want better exposure. Can you refer any good reputed solicitor firm of Kolkata. Please, if you have.
Regards,
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:36
sir\madam
i married to vibhawri on 6\7\2008.before that vibhawri married to milind on 1\1\2005.But milind expired on 17\11\2007.on 3\7\2008 vibhawri father took the rights(haq) from their ancestral property forcefully .will she get back her rights? can she file a case against her father?in which category it comes?
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:33
any one can help me in my query.
we are pvt new company and we have big project now for porject we need land , we have no money to purchase land.
so we want to make agreemet with land owner to give land for our porject and when that land sold for part of porject we will tranfer that money to land owner...
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:31
r/sir,
I was a member of an a.o.p and I had
retired from that a.o.p.in 2003.A public announcement had been made but the copy of announcement is not in my possession and it is with rhe remaning members who are not co operative.I have the copy of dissociation from that a.o.p.Now in a case I may have to produce
the public announcement.what should I do?
Can I File an affidavit in this regard.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:30
am working in a Pvt company and my boss has asked me to prepare a agreement / contract, details as below
1. We will pay Rs.2.25lakhs to Mr. Ramesh as advance for purchase of processed gascutting.
2. Against this amount we will receive 2% interest/month in reducing balance method.
We will collect 6 nos. equal PDC (total being Rs.2.25lakhs) before release of this amount
please help me out.Very Very Very urgent
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Require Sub Code of ESIC in different states
Dear Friends,
Our Co's require Consultant or Legal Practicner ESIC Sub Code as well as Prof. Tax No & LWF, Contract Lic. in State Rajasthan, AP, Maharashtra, UP East, UP West, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu New Delhi, Chandigarh, MP, Karnataka.
The Person who are interested can send there details on Mail ID arihant_ac@rediff.com
We request all of you to please reply urgent.