Anonymous
30 June 2012 at 15:25
I and my brother have two plots of land adjacent to each other.we both share common boundaries with a khas land.His boundary with the khas land is greater than mine.Can he file any legal suit against me if i want to acquire half of the khas land?
syed niaz ahmed shah
29 June 2012 at 10:24
my property is situated in Jammu J&K.
The government is taking over the property because of flyover being constructed under Asian development Bank loan.
The government is rehabilitating by giving land at different place, while asked R&B to do evaluation of the building.
the department is using the yardstick of R&B of J&K which is of old laws and not using the present market value of assessing the property. Also I will be loosing the rent which i am getting from the building
The query is as to how to make the Government assess the value of the building keeping the present market value and material inputs and labor at present.
the market value of building at present and the variation in the building assessed by the government is nearly 3 to 4 times difference.
The ADB guideline is that the people who are getting dispossessed have to be properly rehabilitation and compensated.
paras
29 June 2012 at 08:57
Hello Sir,
I had taken an NOC for my car from Noida RTO to Pune in 2010. I stayed there for sometime but did not register or paid road tax in Pune as I was onsite for my job. As I know NOC gets expired after 6 months. Now I am back in NCR region and want to cancel my NOC.Someone suggested that I need to take a letter from Pune RTO that my car was not registered or paid any road tax. Now I am in Gurgaon so it will be very difficult to go back to obtain this letter. Can you please guide me what shall be my approach? Thank you in advance.
Regards
Paras Sood
vinaykala
28 June 2012 at 21:33
dear sir,
i filed an rti app on may 15 12 seeking reasons for denial of refund of rs 15888/- for ay 08-09 for which assessment is time barred.
i filed the original return for ay 08-09 in une 2008 and followed it up with a revised return on 31.03.2012 seeking refund of rs 15888/-
both the returns are time barred.
how ever in response to my rti app the cpio has denied that any refund is pending.
he has provided a concocted computer print out signed by him on a date before the time barring date for original return seeking instead a demand of rs 50000/- odd!!!!
to me he has written that the original it return for ay 08-09 is not on record.
he has also stated in another communication to the income tax ombudsman that the revised return for ay 08-09 was provided to them by the applicant.
thus on record it is evident that the income tax dept has neither return and also no enclosures and yet chooses to seek interrest under sec 234a b etc.
i feel that istead of pursuing this rti i shouldd file another rti questioning the documents supplied.
i seek expert advice from a taxation person
i have not received any assessment order for ay 08-09 .
it is in the concocted records of the it department.
they are determined not to give the refund.
i also took up the matter with the income tax ombudsman but to him too they gave concocted stories.
should i file the rti with the pio of the it ombudsman.
i am well versed with income tax but would like guidance from an expert
vinay kala june 28,12
mannraj
28 June 2012 at 16:51
I want to if a pvt company which will be owned by me is eligible to buy agricultural land for farming purpose.
i am a farmer of uttar pradesh.
also let me know the various acts and laws regarding the registration of the company.
and the amount of land that the company can buy.
also let me know the various taxes i have to pay to various departments.
your help will be appreciated and i need it urgently.
thank you
Hiten Jain
28 June 2012 at 16:47
Our society Managing Committee has still not made a Bond M-20.If there is no Bond M-20, what are the consequences? When Bond M-20 should be made? If in every AGM a new committee has been appointed, then Bond M-20
should be made after every AGM ?
If the outstanding maintenance of member is more than Rs.5000, then a Society Secretary/ Chairman cuts their Water Supply. Does they have a rights to do that? If no, then if they do what a member should do?
varma
28 June 2012 at 14:07
My grand mother has 3 sons 1)raju ,2)Ram & 3)satya In year 1985,she has given her propety 4.2 acres of land through Will in name of Raju - 2.1 acre & satya - 2.1 acre & that WILL also registered in subregister office.
My grandmother was died in year 1987.But before her death ,Ram &satya become unique & created registered fraud GPA for 1 acre land of Raju on name of satya in year 1986(taking thumb prints of my grandmother when she was alive but I have no proof now) & same land was sold to Mr Ram on 5 Rs stamp paper but it was unregistered.
In year 1988,Raju came to know that out of 2.1 acre ,1 acre land was sold to Ram by satya through unregistred document.
In year 1998,Raju had filed suit on Satya & ram for making fraud GPA & for declaration of Title.But Raju had lost the case in year 2000 & He appeal in high court in year 2000.
Unfortunately satya had died in year 2010 & Ram had died 2012 &I(raju) had file the case on Ram & satya legal heir.But they are not appearing in court.My question is
1)Whether I(Raju) can get decree in his favour in the absence of Ram & satya legal heir.
2)Sice case has run for last 12 years,whether court can consider those arguments also before hearing in absence of ram & satya legal heir.
3)If satya legal heir not present & only Ram legal heir present,then what is the case status
Reetu Bhandari
28 June 2012 at 13:17
hello,
the rate per unit of electricity mentioned in agreement was Rs.6 when actual rate as prescribed by concerned authority was 3 . Now when the rate has come up to Rs.3.7 per unit the landlord has mentioned that Rs.7 per unit will be charged per unit of electricity (by renewing the rent agreement)w.e.f july.
i dont see any sense for what he has done..i am not concerned about the fact that we will have to pay more, but the thing is that it is totally insensible..whoever has any knowledge regarding this kind of matter will you plz suggest us what is the right of owner regarding deciding rates? and is there any remedy available for tenants who actually suffer from their owner??
Ramesh
28 June 2012 at 12:19
Dear experts of the forum,
Kindly go through my problem and advice me the action to be taken;
In my family family my grand father had given an inam land on a permanent lease to a person in the year 1910.The total extent of land is Ac 49-39 guntas,out which small extent (Ac7-07guntas, which was proved in many forum of Revenue and civil courts),at that time area is not mentioned in the leased deed, but only some ground markings like trees ,well, borders etc were mentioned.This has now become a big problem and the lease holder now claiming the total land ie Ac 49-39 guntas, unscrupulously. Ultimately our GPA holder had compromised for 60/40 in favour of litigant.The compromise deed is signed by the GPA holder(who he is not authorised; not mentioned in the GPA,given to him).
Please gothrogh the attachment, where in High Court of AP, my Advocate not able to contest the case properly, may be because he don't want...
{As i am not able to attach the file iam pasting the same here, please:
Issue No.1: What was the extent of the land leased out to Mrs.k’s husband?
The appellate authority held that the entire area admeasuring Ac.49.39 guntas was leased out buy late Sri.B in favor of late Sri.N, in old survey No.279.
The appellate authority reached this conclusion after personal inspection of the property in dispute, the examination of original lease deed and the other attendant circumstances like Revenue Records.
The learned consul for the petitioners Sri. PR, made an attempt to demonstrate that the conclusion reached by the appellate authority is not correct. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents Sri. Su R submitted that it is a question of fact decided by the appellate authority, on appreciation of evidence and this court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , will not sit as an appellate Court, to re-appreciate the evidence and interfere with the finding of the fact rendered by the competent statutory bodies.
I accept the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent-Sri. Su R. It is a settled principle of law that this court will not in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, sit as an appellate Court to re-appreciate the evidence for the purpose of judging the correctness of the finding of fact recorded by an inferior tribunal unless it is demonstrated that the finding is absolutely perverse or based on absolutely no material It is not the case here. There was some material before the collector to reach the conclusion and in reaching the said conclusion; he categorically discussed each and every aspect and the evidence available on record. Merely because an alternative view is possible on the said evidence, this court will not be justified, in my view, in interfering with the finding of the fact.}
Thanking you ALL in advance,with a request for an erly reply please.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding constrution building in gram panchayat
I heard that all construction has completed prior to 1995 in Maharashtra Gram Panchayat Act, it has been given approved legal and Registered under this act whether it is true please clarify the querry