Sachin
08 August 2013 at 14:08
I have purchased a flat in Pune in January 2010.The agreement date is 2 nd January 2010.I have made the payment of 20 lac rupees for the said flat by cheque on the same day.Builder has given me the possession letter on 4 th January 2010.I started using the flat after I received the possession letter. After that he has given me the occupancy certificate dated 29 th March 2012.On 7 th august 2013, he has given me the statement of vat+service tax+interest as follows :
Agreement value = 2000000 Rs.
Service tax = 61800 Rs.
MVAT = 56200 Rs.
Interest = 38216 Rs.
Total = 156216 Rs.
He has asked me to pay the entire amount by 20 th August 2013.
Please guide me in this regard.How much vat & service tax is applicable to me in this case as I have purchased a ready possession flat & builder has given me the possession letter first & then the occupancy certificate as mentioned above.
Manjula
07 August 2013 at 17:27
A case was filed by the Lokayukta on one of our Officer.During pendancy of this case his promotion was kept under sealed cover and his junior was promoted.Now he is acquitted in that case by the court and his departmental inquiry is also closed accordingly.But the Lokayuktha has filed appeal before the Court and not yet furnished the documents. Whether this Officer is eligible for promotion with retrospective effect from the date his junior was promoted pending appeal by the lokayukta since he is acquitted.
anil sharma
06 August 2013 at 12:06
hi all,
kisi rule mai use kiye kuch word's, jiska kai isteethiyon mai use kiya gaya hai, yadi us word jisme isko use kiya gaya hai, vahan iski kya defination hai, under RTI MAI maangna, kya viyaakhyaa kahalata hai?
02 koi rule kis niyam, or law ya order per banaya gaya hai, usko RTI ke duara mangna kis aadhar per viyaakhyaa bana,
03 her rules ke ander use kiya gaya shabd ki defination di jaati hai, niyam banane ka uddesh hota hai, usko explain kiya jata hai, to fir kis prakar se yeh mangna viyaakhya hua,
04 law, act or rules ka govt of india ke kis ministry duaara nirmaan kiya jata hai?
plz sir reply me soon
thanks
anil sharma
mahesh waghela
03 August 2013 at 15:43
previously rent bill ws in jointnameof my father and mother after death of my father in yr 2010 rent receiptis in nameof living mother aged 84 yrs.asper m.o.u.signed by father me and younger brother he has transfered shopof father in his nameand henceno right in said room in mumbai but he is harrasing my mother and to me i am staying seperately my father fileda suit in bombay city civilcourt for getting evictio order brother filed write petition in high court tell me whether my brother can claim his right in said rented room?suggest me omecourts judjement in this matter toprotect interest of my mother who is legal tenantplease thanks urgentally since i have tocite judmentin citi civil and bombay high court
Adv. Amarkumar A.Pethe
02 August 2013 at 22:14
sir,
a]as per land reform suggestion by central govt 2 all states recently whether maha govt do changes in ceiling act 1961
b]if govt reduce holding of ceiling, whether govt allow compansation for new surplus land? ,effect will prospective or restrospective?
will govt give any time to sell or transfer?
c]will it be constitutional to exit someone from [as per present law] lawful possession of land [as he purchessed land within ceiling limit]
without any compansation? by making new rule.
i am waiting for ur valuable comments
Nitin Vaghani
01 August 2013 at 17:28
Dear Sirs,
In our CHS at Mumbai, the secretary has given a notice (agenda) for the AGM along with the statement of accounts. Agenda contains 4 items including approval of accounts. Agenda does not have any item regarding the extra collection funds from the members of the society. Even then, the secretary has taken this matter for discussion and propose to collect a total sum of Rs.11 lacs from 53 members of the society. As few members were present at the meeting, the secretary, without much efforts, declared the resolution as passed and included the same in the minutes of the meeting. Hence, he has forced every member to pay Rs.20000/- in a single installment and included this amount in the maintenance bills, even though this item was not on the agenda of the meeting.
Can I take any action in the matter? If yes, under which act of MCS Act 1960?
Your reply will be highly appreciated.
Prasad
01 August 2013 at 14:19
This is regarding a query for a property.
My father purchased a property in 1979 .In this property on EAST side is our gate and on WEST side my fathers 2nd sisters son lives (for easy reference let me give name as A). On NORTH side of this property plot my fathers elder sister plot ( for easy reference let me give name as B) and on SOUTH side a neighbor lives .
My father has given 2 cents of this plot to A (west side) , ORALLY and father build a compound wall. My father requested B to give 2 cents of her land (north side) and she gave 2 cents ORALLY and on her presence itself compound wall constructed in 1989 - 1990. B sold her complete land to a Christian on 1991.(B -she is no more living now)
There was a court case in 1992 when on heavy rain compound wall on East side fell down due to a tree of neighbor fell on EAST side and at that time the authorities came for investigation and at that time it was recorded that how much is our property and what all measurements etc and they recorded 2 cents that we got ORALLY from B (still we have that judgment papers where at time how we got 2 cents from B).
our father expired in March 2013.Our father has written this property on three sons name., on records this 2 cents which we got from B and 2 cents which we gave to A is not there as it was done ORALLY.
B is no more living and as i stated earlier has disposed her properties and now in a christen name .A is my fathers sisters son , and 2 cents properties is holding as father has given on fathers sister son ORALLY. fathers sisters son A also dont have any documentary proof to say how he got this 2 cents from my father .We are not in good terms with A and day by day he is creating problems.Now as we don’t have documentary evidence of 2 cents which we gave to A and 2 cents which we got from B , how this can be sorted out. Please advice. latest rule has come into force ROR in Kerala
waiting for an answer please
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Impact of 97th constitution amendment on mcs act 1961
Even though MCS Act 1960 is amended consequent to 97th Constitutional amendendment,some Housing Societies in Mumbai are still restricting membership on religion basis in view of Supreme Court Judgement of 2005 in Zorastrian Society of Gujarat State wherein only parsis are allowed as members as against the exsisting coop Act. Pl clarify whether present amemdment overrules the above Judgement in all states of India.