brabourne
06 November 2017 at 23:16
So, I have been working at a small technology company since two years now.
For the 1st year i received training(Cost from my Salary 1.5lacs) and worked at the same company..
For the 2nd year i was outsourced to a bigger company.
The SLA is of 3 years and consequences are an amount of 1.5 lacs.
The non compete states that i cannot join their client.
Will it be against the companies agreement if i leave to join the bigger company (although i am paying the service agreement amount and i have no trade secrets of the company).
J. Raj george
05 November 2017 at 22:13
Sir, the advocate commissioner report has been scrapped by sub judge in first appeal for reason that the suit property was measured by a sale deed marked as plaintiff side document 1 given by plaintiff lawyer during commissioner,s measurement.whether is it not proper to give a marked document to commissioner by plaintiff lawyer.
Prithvi
05 November 2017 at 14:19
Hello,
My apartment's name is SLV UNIWORTH CLASSIC @ HBR layout and we have already made individual metering system all the 14 existing Apartments because 4 years back the Builder used to live in the Penthouse which is one of the 14 apartments and a lot of water was being wasted and to control that we made the water metering system.
The association took a decision without the consent of the members or the residents living living in the apartment which otherwise is done on all the previous occasions when a decision is taken.
Even after we have metres in place and we have been paying as per the consumption of water they are trying to put a surcharge or additional cost of pumping by deciding a cap off number of liters.
is it fare to allocate 14500 liters per month for a family 1 and a family of 6?
My point is changing extra over the metered usage is Illegal and threatening the tenants and forcably making them pay is Illegal.
Please share expert advice as I feel this is Illegal.
House no no of ppl
001. 3
002. 3
003 3
101. 2
102. 6
103. 3
201. 5
202. 6
203. 4
301. 4
302. 4
303. 1
401. 5
402. 5
Thanks
Prithvi
vasudevan v
05 November 2017 at 13:39
Sir,
I am a member of the housing society regd under Tamilnadu societies Act 1975
I have a query.
Byelaws approved on 23-12-2016
Returning officers appointed on 23-12-2016 to conduct elections on 29-01-17
Elections held, voting by members done, results announced, EC appointed and two EC meetings conducted in Feb and Mar 17 and 4 EC meetings conducted after 03-04-17
In Feb 17, First EC meeting authorised president & secretary to register Assn
Secretary filed papers for regn on 12-05-2017
Regn certificate issued on 14-06-2017
Later it was found out by one member, that the formation date was given as 03-04-2017
Form VI -member register shows all members joined on 03-04-2017
All EC meetings, authorisation given by EC in Feb 17 are invalid in the eye of Law because formation date
is declared as 03-04-17. Assn cannot exist prior to formation
All members including EC members as per records submitted joined only on 03-04-2017 and therefore prior to 03-04-2017 they are all rank outsiders and non members.
Election conducted in Jan 17 is nullified by wrongfully declaring the date of formation as 03-04-17
Therefore EC is invalid
Secretary cannot file papers as no valid authorisation given
Regn is invalid
Bank Account is opened on 14-03-17
Pls clarify my doubt whether EC is valid, regn is valid
All members paid member fee of Rs 10/- in Jan 17 and exercised their vote in Jan 17 election
Subscription of Rs 100 collected only from 03-04-17
Entire EC resigned Ad-hoc committee formed to conduct fresh elections.
In the circumstances whether regn is valid
if not can we correct the records as mistake
or can we go for fresh regn
Thanks in advance
Anonymous
04 November 2017 at 11:35
Dear Respected Lawyers,
I am seeking your legal advice on the following issue.
Background of OS case.
I am standing as POA on behalf of my friend who was cheated of property. After over a year the case had on back and forth from summons, Plaintiff evidence, order and Defendant evidence etc.
Unfortunately in many of the hearing the defendants hasn’t appeared except once to file Written Statement when they did not come forward to cross question my (POA-Plaintiff). On one incidence court had put a fine and that too they did pay. However in last 2 hearing when the court had put for defendant evidence at that time they paid the previously charged fine to me (POA-Plaintiff), but in the latest hearing though they were suppose to produce evidence in claim of Written statement and now they have move the case to Re-Open and recalling the earlier order stage.
With the above background, in the next hearing can we post /raise the objection with details requesting the Judge to allow us to cross examine the defendants against all false claims they have made in their written statement along with other Whatsapp, SMS cross discussion between defendant and plaintiff… wherein the defendant have indirectly admitted his wrong doing of double sale of plot and that he will buyback the property or give his father-in-law property if we take back the FIR complaint.
Appreciate your valuable and detail suggestions.
Thanks & Regards
Stephen
Quadir
04 November 2017 at 07:56
Perhaps my query involves a question of law. It is about a document being void / voidable, limitation attached to it and court fees for attacking this type of document.
I have a perpetual lessee under a registered lease deed executed between my late father and him. A nominal yearly rent is fixed in the lease deed, which tenant/lessee is supposed to pay annually, failing which landlord (before my father, now me) shall have the right to re-enter the property leased.
Concealing this fact, recently the lessee SOLD the property to someone through a registered sale deed, showing himself as absolute OWNER of the property and gave away the possession to the purchaser.
Now questions are:
1. Is this sale deed a void or voidable document?
2. If it is a void document, still am I bound to take action against it within the limitation period of three years from its execution?
3. If it is void, then do void documents have limitations?
4. Do I have to get it cancelled and declared it as null & void with a prayer of getting the possession (as a consequential relief) ? If so, do I have to pay court fees ad-valorem?
5. Now my property is in the hands of a stranger and in order to get it back i have to pay court fees on the market value of the property, which doesn't really make sense. So what remedy do I have now?
( I am aware of SC Judgements- Shailendra Bhardwaj & Ors vs Chandra Pal (2013) 1 SCC 579 & Suhrid Singh vs Randhir Singh , AIR 2010 SC 2807. But they do not help in my case.)
Your answers would be much appreciated, thank you.
- Quadir
vanessa Anthony john
03 November 2017 at 21:02
Hi just wanted to know how is the verification done for court marriage in catholic also wanna know if a married person having an affair and wanna get married can it be done in Mantralaya how do you people come to know if he is married earlier need help immediately plz
DKJ
02 November 2017 at 00:48
It has been clearly detected that my signatures are forged on policy proposal forms of life insurance policy which I bought in 2009. I bought this to the notice of my insurer and the insurer is maintaining absolute silence about signature forgery. It is clearly evident that my signatures are forged at 2 places. I have filed a case in district consumer forum. I guess consumer forums don't decide on cases on signature forgery. There is one more ground of tampering the proposal form without authentication (absence of counter-signature) on which my case in consumer forum may stand. Regarding signature forgery, what action can I take ? Can I get a forensic test done at my cost for forged signatures and then submit the forensic report in court ? In future, if the insurer wants to settle the matter out of court, can I withdraw my case ? Against whom I should file a case in court ? The insurance agent who sold me the policy in 2009 is no more employed with my insurer.
Amit
01 November 2017 at 14:40
I am planing to bur a land 2000 sq.ft. in lucknow. 143 to the land was issued by SDM in may 2016 but the same was suspended by DM in December 2016. How it will affect my interest later if I purchases the land. Appeal regarding revolacal of the 1 43 is under process.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Gpa
Sir
If a GPA executor dies , then the GPA holder terminates is happen
In this i need a citation in support of GPA not valid after death of executor
Regards