Anonymous
19 November 2017 at 18:12
Namaste Sir
I am from Patan,Gujarat,India living in society built in 2009.Society authority wants to built a store room in the common plot near my house hunting our privacy.Is it legal to built store room by society auyhority in common plot.Hope you will guide me.
Anonymous
19 November 2017 at 18:08
Namaste Sir
I am from Patan,Gujarat,India living in society built in 2009.Society authority wants to built a store room in the common plot near my house hunting our privacy.Is it legal to built store room by society auyhority in common plot.Hope you will guide me.
rajasekaran
19 November 2017 at 16:27
In 138 NI Act case when the Housing Finance Company evades the notice in 1991 and signatories of the cheque are proceeded with in 1994, can the signatoires of the cheque be aquitted in 1997 because the charges on the company was not pressed as if company was not arrayed as accused ?
In appeal against aqquital u/s 378 of Crpc can a defence following Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours Private Limited, (2012) 5 SCC 661 be taken that charges against company was not pressed? The Housing company has surfaced and many have succeded in consumer forums as in Jugmandar Dass Bansal V/S M/S Tapoban Housing Finance Ltd. ,R. Udaya Kumar vs M/s. Tapoban Housing Finance Limited, New Delhi,etc
Anonymous
19 November 2017 at 11:33
It is respectfully submitted that the 1st respondent alleged to have been lodged a report to the 2nd respondent police station on 29.7.2015 stating that she and the petitioner are working as Police Constables in I.T. Cell in Cyberabad Police Commissionerate. It is alleged that the petitioner made the 1st respondent promised her to marry and made her to believe him. It is alleged that on 11.7.2015, the petitioner and the 1st respondent went to Yadagirigutta Temple on a bike, where he booked a room without her knowledge and raped her and promised that he will marry. It is further alleged that the petitioner made a phone call to the 1st respondent and said that marriage engagement was completed with his relative girl and that he and his family members threatened her to kill, if she disclose anything to any one. Basing on the said allegations, the police registered the FIR and subsequently filed the charge sheet. 2. It is respectfully submitted that the alleged offence under Section 376 IPC, according to the 1st respondent was occurred on 11.7.2015, whereas, she made report to the police station on 29.7.2015. Therefore, there is an abnormal delay in lodging the report to the police station. Further, the medical report also certified that there is no evidence of recent sexual intercourse. There is also contradictory statements of the 1st respondent from complaint to the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C (. On the ground of abnormal delay and in absence of the medical report, the essential ingredients under Section 376 IPC do not attract, therefore, the proceedings relating to the said offence are liable to be quashed. ( Is it possible or not ?) 3. Now her marriage was fixed and both are agreed to compromise as for CrPC 482.. But her layer is misguided her it's not possible, future problems will happen in personal life and services Maters. Please clarify
Mahesh Revelle
19 November 2017 at 08:06
1. It is respectfully submitted that the 1st respondent alleged to have been lodged a report to the 2nd respondent police station on 29.7.2015 stating that she and the petitioner are working as Police Constables in I.T. Cell in Cyberabad Police Commissionerate. It is alleged that the petitioner made the 1st respondent promised her to marry and made her to believe him. It is alleged that on 11.7.2015, the petitioner and the 1st respondent went to Yadagirigutta Temple on a bike, where he booked a room without her knowledge and raped her and promised that he will marry. It is further alleged that the petitioner made a phone call to the 1st respondent and said that marriage engagement was completed with his relative girl and that he and his family members threatened her to kill, if she disclose anything to any one. Basing on the said allegations, the police registered the FIR and subsequently filed the charge sheet.
2. It is respectfully submitted that the alleged offence under Section 376 IPC, according to the 1st respondent was occurred on 11.7.2015, whereas, she made report to the police station on 29.7.2015. Therefore, there is an abnormal delay in lodging the report to the police station. Further, the medical report also certified that there is no evidence of recent sexual intercourse. There is also contradictory statements of the 1st respondent from complaint to the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C (. On the ground of abnormal delay and in absence of the medical report, the essential ingredients under Section 376 IPC do not attract, therefore, the proceedings relating to the said offence are liable to be quashed. ( Is it possible or not ?)
3. Now her marriage was fixed and both are agreed to compromise as for CrPC 482.. But her layer is misguided her it's not possible, future problems will happen in personal life and services Maters. Please clarify.
Balagopal Menon
18 November 2017 at 18:10
Under which provision of the CRPC does the right to appeal lie from the interim order of the Metropolitan Magistrate?
Shasahnk
17 November 2017 at 19:00
In Madhya Pradesh State Service Exam, a general category candidate is vacating a seat of deputy collector post. So in normal situaiton, this vacancy should be filled from the waiting list by the candidate who has 1st waiting (Lets call him B).
But the already selected OBC candidate ( Lets call him A) in the main merit list has more marks then the candidate who is at 1st waiting position( i.e. A has more marks than B)
So, I want to ask that whether the vacant seat would be filled by the OBC candidate(i.e. A) in the main merit list by reshuffling him to the general category seat or will the seat be filled from waiting list by B irrespective of higher merit of OBC candidate in main merit list
Sudeshna
17 November 2017 at 17:39
Hi
I m using my maiden surname after marriage. In fact in all my ID proofs viz. Voter Id, PAN, Aadhaar and Passport my maiden surname is there. In the marriage certificate my maiden surname is there also. The problem is in the Birth Information of my baby(age 11yrs) issued by the Nursing Home the mother's surname is given as the surname after my marriage which I don't use anywhere. As a result in the Birth Certificate of my baby issued by the Municipality the Mother's surname is the same (after marriage) as that in the Birth Information.
As per the local Municipality once the Birth Information issued by the Nursing home gets changed they would be able to change the Birth Certificate. I have already applied to the Nursing Home authority for the change of the Mother's surname in the Birth Information along with all the necessary documents including ID proof of myself and an Affidavit. But they refused to do the same stating that they have destroyed the records as it is beyond 10 yrs and as per MCI regulations Nursing home authority is supposed to keep the records only for 6 yrs. Even they are not willing to give any written document in this regard.
Under these circumstances I am at a loss what to do next for the change of my surname in the Birth Certificate of my baby.
Please help...
Hari Pratap
16 November 2017 at 18:25
Both me and my wife are in govt service. Shortly after marriage she conceded that she had an affair in college, but I let it go because that was past. But after few years I noted she would keep her phone very guarded. So I got suspect that she might be seeing somebody. When probed or confronted about being secretive, she would get violent or threaten suicide saying doubting her fidelity was demeaning to her. But now I have clinching proof that she is currently sleeping with somebody. Now I want to prosecute my wife for causing intense mental agony to me and my old parents by her violent behavior for last many years. I also want to put her lover behind bars (he is married with a son).
For first six yrs of marriage, we used to live alone. After this, when our first kid was born, my parents moved in to look after us. After three years, she demanded that my old parents move out (another kid had been born in between). When asked as to who would look after the toddler kids, she said that they could be kept in a creche. When I resisted her formula, she created a huge scene, tried calling police, and her parents came and took her away with both kids who were intensely attached with me and grand parents. Me and my parents were distraught. She returned after two years, on the condition that my parents live separately. So we are together for last few months again, with my parents living separately in vicinity and looking after kids till we return from our offices. But she still keeps saying that she wants to get away from me and my family because we all are morose. Now, with clinching evidence of her affair, I want to divorce her. Foremost, I want custody of two minor daughters (5 nd 7). She will definitely blackmail us with our emotional attachment with kids. She is in the habit of saying that law & society are on her side. I am ready to let her go if she leaves the kids, but I am afraid of discussing any mutual course of action because as soon as she gets to know that I have nailed her affair, she will again create huge uproar and will again run away with kids. What legal actions are available with me against her infidelity and causing intense mental agony to me and my family for last over seven years?(hari_pratap @ hotmail . com; Greater Noida, U.P).
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rights of bonafide purchaser
B sold property to C. C sold it to D. A files a case on D stating that D encroached A's Property. The proof submitted by A is Pahani (land revenue record copy before 1992). During X examination he stated that B got degree for the property (A and B are brothers , propert was acquired by their father) , he did not explain how got from the degree of his brother, lawyers have not probed further once he stated te above fact. Now after 5 years , when we thought it came to an end. A's lawyer issued notices to B & C.
Land was in te name of B in records when he sold it.
B - 1992 onwards was in the possession
C 1995-2003
D 2003- onwards.,
Whaether it is correct for A to now give notice to B & C , having not mentioned about them so long and based his case entirely on encroachment of land by D.
What is the position of D likely. does it anyway depend on proceedings against B & C.