Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Santhosh   07 February 2018 at 16:22

Incorrect name in sellers katha

Dear Sir,

Below is my query,

Buyer: Sri Santhosh
Seller: Smt JALAJAKSHI


In the Seller property documents below is the information,
Name as per SALEDEED : Smt JALAJAKSHI
Name as per Encumbrance Certificate [EC] : Smt JALAJAKSHI
Name as per KATHA : Smt JALJAKSHI

Notice the 4th letter "A" missing in the name present in the KATHA as it is printed wrongly as "Smt JALJAKSHI" instead of "Smt JALAJAKSHI"

Now coming to the buyer side the registration is already done and the SALEDEED is available, so with this the owenrship of the land is with Sri Santhosh.
In the Buyer property documents below is the information,
The name pertaining to buyer is all correct but there seems to be some problem in the backside of page No.2 as the information gets downloaded from the sellers Katha.
As the name printed in the sellers katha is "Smt JALJAKSHI" instead of "Smt JALAJAKSHI" which is the 4th letter "A" missing the same gets downloaded to buyers saledeed
as well as in the EC.

So now in the Buyers Saledeed after the registration below is the information,
Backside of Page No.2 sellers name : "Smt JALJAKSHI"
Encumbrance Certificate [EC] Seller Name : "Smt JALJAKSHI"

Now we can see the mismatch in the name "Smt JALAJAKSHI" v/s "Smt JALJAKSHI" in the buyers SALEDEED and also in EC as normally the EC will be taken for 12-15 years.

Could you please help to answer my below questions?
1\ How to resolve this problem in saledeed considering i will be going for resale after 2 years , since the buyer of my property will be able to see this mismatch.
2\ How to update the sellers name correctly in EC from "Smt JALJAKSHI" to "Smt JALAJAKSHI" as this will gets traced easily if the EC is compared for last 12 -15 years.
3\ Is it possible to update the name correctly in KATHA of seller as the problem started with KATHA and ita reference point.
Please note that i am yet to apply for Katha transfer.

Thanks in advance

Priyanshu Mehta   07 February 2018 at 14:25

Rti information not received after gic final order

Dear Sir,

As I filled RTI for seeking information but PIO did not response upto 30 days then I filled 1st Appeal against PIO to FAA (First Appeal Authority) but the FAA did not ordered to PIO for providing complete information as per RTI application at the 1st appeal hearing.

Then the PIO provided wrong, misleading information so we filled second appeal to GIC against PIO and FAA. The GIC disposed my appeal and ordered FAA that the applicant is not satisfied with the PIO's answer hence GIC ordered PIO and FAA to give chance of hearing to applicant and PIO ane make assumption each point by point until the applicant not satisfy. This order was passed to PIO and FAA but after the order received to FAA and PIO but till date we have not given chance for hearing and also they didnt provided the information till date after the GIC order.

1. Now, I want to know that can I file complaint to GIC if already filled second appeal and GIC order passed ?

2. Can I just send simple application to GIC for informing that the FAA and PIO didnt obey your order and didnt provided information till date ??

3. Do I have to file writ petition to Gujarat High Court ?? Do I have to find lawyer for that or the writ petition can be filled be us ? What will be the possibilities for result ? How much it will cost ?

I request you to please guide further.

Regards

Anonymous   07 February 2018 at 14:02

educational name change certificate

Hello sir my name is basith ahamed but sslc, hsc,ug, certificates are name in basith ahmamed.then I am change tamilnadu gazette in my name is basith shamed.Then how steps are used in change my all certificates? Please good solution for me

HARSHAD KHONA   07 February 2018 at 12:31

Number of flates

Our society was formed with 30 flats and share certificates were issued accordingly. Now he says after 3.5 years of construction that he has committed an error and says that there are only 24 flats. He says this as he could sell top 6 floors to individuals and says this are only one flat each. His this view is due to saving maintenance expenses and insist that maintenance expenses should be distributed flatwise.
We need advise that can he reduce the number of flats in this manner to reduce maintenance bill for top six floors.
Pl help.

HARSHAD KHONA   07 February 2018 at 12:22

Land conveyance

Our society is formed by the builder after the delay of 2.5 years.
Ours is redeveloped building and building was completed in May 2014.Earlier it was rented building.
All old tenants were accommodated and rest were sold.He has not given conveyance so far to the society. The agreement with old and new tenants is differently worded. Now he wants to retain rights of terrace and underground parking with himself. He wants all the owner to agree to this before giving conveyance.
Kindly advise what is way out.

Athi Vishal HD   07 February 2018 at 09:54

Lost public record

Sir, Im working in Karnataka State Govt Dept and working in RTI Section. In my Office file pertaining to a complaint has been lost and it has not yet traced. In meantime complainant has filed RTI in r/o that complaint. We gave reply that the same has not been traced. Finally in that case Karnataka Information Commission has ordered that to take action as per Karnataka State public record act 2010 & 2013 against the Govt. Employee who is responsible for lost of Govt. Record. Please guide me what are the steps to be taken from my Office against the concerned who is responsible for loss of record as per Karnataka State public record act 2010 & 2013 '

Paras Arya   07 February 2018 at 08:22

Help and Guidance on Appointment Letter in FCI

प्रार्थी ने भारतीय खाद्य निगम में परीक्षा पास कर टाईपिस्ट (हिंदी) के पद पर चयन पाया है जिस पर प्रार्थी को नियुक्ति पत्र जारी किया जा चुका है. परंतु डॉ भीमराव अंबेडकर विश्वविद्यालय, आगरा संबंधी कारणों से कार्यग्रहण नहीं करने दिया गया (होल्ड पर रखा गया). निगम द्वारा प्रार्थी के स्नातक योग्यता B.A. (जोकि Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Agra से हासिल की है) की सत्यापन हेतु पत्र भेजा गया जिस पर विश्विद्यालय सत्यापन नहीं कर रहा है जबकि एकबार विश्विद्यालय सत्यापन कर निगम को पत्र भेज चुका है! अब विश्वविद्यालय में किसी एक नियमावली का हवाला देकर प्रार्थी के कुल अंकों में 1 अंक की घटी कर नई अंकतालिका जारी करने के लिए कहा जा रहा है। जबकि प्रार्थी को B.A. III, 596/1200 अंकों से उत्तीर्ण की अंकतालिका जारी की गई थी, प्रोविसिनल डिग्री भी जारी की गई. जिस के आधार पर प्रार्थी ने भर्ती परीक्षा पास कर चयन हासिल किया। साथ ही एक बार सत्यापन भी किया जा चुका है जिसमे 596 ही अंक बताये गए थे। लेकिन अब विश्विद्यालय के रिकॉर्ड में पास के स्थान पर पेन से RD/PMW लिख दिया और Re-Examination संबंधी किसी नई नियमाबली का हबाला देकर 1 अंक की कटौती कर नई अंकतालिका जारी करने को कहा जा रहा है।

अतः उक्त संबंध में प्रार्थी को क्या करना चाहिए, जिससे कि प्रार्थी नियुक्ति पर कार्यग्रहण पा सके। कृपया सहायता करें तथा कोर्ट या जांच संबंधी शिकायत कहाँ की जाए...?

धन्यवाद।

पारस
मो. 9720431169
Email. mr.parasarya@gmail.com

Swathi   07 February 2018 at 07:30

Urban land ceiling act

Respected sir/mam I bought a property in 1998, i didnt get patta from the owner at that time...now i decided to sell my property...at that time only i came to know that my land is under ceiling....i have only 1204 sq ft...when i approached vao he asked me to go to ULT office...in ult office they asked me to submit an application for innocent buyer with EC , sale deed and address proof...i submited all they have asked ,then they told i will be called for verification statement....after all this i will get my land back?how many months will it take to get clearance... will govt take my land?...

Adv Nidhi Banga   06 February 2018 at 13:38

Recovery suit

Plaintiff files a suit for recovery against defendant no.1, 2 &3 and def no. 1 is only a freight and forwarding agent appointed by defendant no. 2 and the plaintiff made the goods for defendant no. 3 which is out of country. Now whats the remedy with defendant no. 1. The def no. 1 only got Rs 15000/- and now he is claiming Rs 60 lacs from the defendant. The goods were delivered to def no. 3 and he did not make the payments. Does multimodal transport act come into picture?