MrunaliniBadavane
14 January 2020 at 09:56
Subject: Regarding your frivolous charge for treating your LWP
Retbrence your email dated 03.01 .2020, regarding the above subject.
1. You have leveled unfounded charge for treating your leave as LWP. You are hereby
informed that you have been taking excessive leave as against your entitlement at that
time as per leave policy of the hospital. resultantly your earned leave has been treated as
LWP.
2. Moreover, on various occasions. 1'ou have been intimating on telephone to Sis Yashoda,
Secretary to the Director, regarding your leave from duty, but you have not been
submitted your sick/earned leave applications. In this regard, you have been issued letter
no. PF -6561646 dated 06.08.2015.
3. You have not approached usual channel to raise your concerns regarding LWP. Neither
has you approached to the requisite authority in the hospital/Director nor to the
Grievance Handling Committee, before writing directly to Government authorities that
too with leveling false charges of mental harassment against the Management.
4. You liai'e used derogatory language againsi iire h,fanagernenr irr the emaii anci spoken
nonsense to Sis Purnima, Assistant Manager - Admin about Manager Administration. It
has been observed that time and again, you have been talking to the Manager
Administration in a threatening tone, in order to show your highhandedness.
5. Your conduct with your colleagues is not up to the mark. One such example is of Sis
Haritha. Pharmacist, your ex-roommate to r,r,hom 1,ou had given harsh time in October
2013. You have locked her in the Bathroom for pretty a long time and that we have
received a complaint from her in that regard and the N4anagement had to shift her the
same day to some other room. This is the level of your rnisconduct. However, taking
lenient view, hoping to any improvement in you, the Management did not taken any
action against you, in that matter.
You are therefore, directed to subrnit your explanation as to wlty your services should not be
terminated and to rvithdrar,v your complaint irnmediately. Your reply should reach to the office
of the undersigned r,vithin 48 hours of the receipt of this notice.
Sis Mrunalini Badavane
Sr Office Assistant
GHRC
Director
my answer is following
Dt 8-1-20
To
Dr. Partap Midha
Director of
GHRC
Respected Sir
Subject: Reply Ref No. P.F. 656/1288 dt 6th Jan 2020
I do not frivolous charges for treating our LWP. Without evidence and proof I do not allegate any body.
1) I am taking leave as per Hospital rules. I had not taken excessive leave. When I had taken excessive leave that time amount deducted from my salary. But this time I have been not taken excessive leave
2) Yes I have been intimating on telephone to Sis Yashoda, Secretary to the Director, When I am not feel well like eg. Loose motion, or too much stomach pain, severe headache, in this situation I intimating on telephone, not earned leave. Last 13 year 10 or 15 time I intimate her.
3) I want to approached to direct Mohinderbhai that’s why I ask the Sis purnima. Where is Mohinder bhai but she is rudely spoken with me . I not ask once I ask three to four time but her answer is same. Then I approach through email. I expect he was speak with me through mobile and ask me why you are send this type of email me. But he was not contact of he was not come office .Every employee’s right he or she see his leave record, Not others but his or her own record, but whenever I ask she is not show me , every time she said take the permission from mohinder bhai. This is not right. When she is maintain the record why not show to my records details, every time why they create suspense.
4) Please you explain derogatory language against the management in the email. Mohinderbhai is not a management. I donot spoken nonsense to sis purnima, ( please explain nonsense word , I spoke to sis purnima) . she is rudely spoken with me. When Mohinder paul is sick and when he is join the office I met him once I ask only how are you . After that till date I donot meet him then how I talking to the manger administration in a threatening tone in this matter you can explain me .
5) I remember that incident. Sis. Harshita inside the bathroom. I want to change my dress. When I change the dress that time she not come outside the bathroom, that’s why I lock outside the door, but I getting late for classed so I rushed I forget to open the lock and went to class. After when I came room. I feel guilty and I say somany time sorry to her . This is done bymistake not purposely. I say sorry to her in front Dr partap Midha. This is not a misconduct
This by mistake. When Susmita with me this same incident with me . Susmita forget open the bathroom lock. Labour Mamata open the lock. I do not say to Susmita you are purposely locked me. One example I give When Sis Milan inside the room balconony, the labour clean the room and they lock the outside door, when I passaway in front her room she given voice please any body open the door. Then I open the door I asked her who is locked she said labour is forget I am inside the lock the door. Same situation with Sis leela Xray dept. she is inside Sis archana is locked her labour geeta is open the door. These all example is not a misconduct this is by mistakenly
Suppose you are not differentiate by mistake or misconduct then I cannot do anything for your intellectual. You are fake allegation to me. I have lot of proof and evidence I enclosed document this lette. You reconcile the your record. When I ask for my leave purpose then I does the misconduct, or misbehaviour .
And Balubhai slapping to Reddikaka this is the conduct. Or good behaviour
When Rupaben slapping to Prabha Tai this is good conduct and good behavior.
As per Sis purnima’s leave software I enclosed printout, As per excel calculation also enclosed
As per both sheet more than my 60 leaves are available, plus this 9 Lwp add then more than 70 leaves are available. This much leave is available and the amount is deducted from my salary than I do not take any objection. You are wrongly act and I do not take any objection. I take objection is misconduct you are does the wrong act is conducted. My leave is more then 60 and you are deducted my amount then this purposely given to me mental harassment.
please recheck and given explaination. This software I had also. Because after Ghansyambhai I seen leave record so I know the software. Software is not a humanbeing when you wrongly enter input the output is came wrongly. So many time I told to Mohinderbhai Sis purnima wrongly entered the input. But he is not accepted.
Thanking
mrunalini
taken earned leve
Total earned leave last 13years
year Restricted leave Sunday 14 20
12 2
2007-2008 15 1 4 10 4
2008-2009 15 1 4 1 1
2009-2010 15 1 4 1 21
2010-2011 21 1 2 12 25
2011-2012 21 1 2 9 30
2012-2013 28 1 3 1 1
2013-2014 28 1 1 1 32
2014-2015 28 1 1 21
2015-2016 28 1 7 1 1
2016-2017 28 1 4 16 27
2017-2018 28 1 5 1 2
2018-2019 28 1 3 7 1
2019-2020 28 1 7 5
6 2
311 13 39 19 1
LWP 135 459 9 25
446 39 Sunday 1 4
498 1 1
6 11
TAKEN LEAVE 429 16 6
balance 69 152 3
15
2
1
1
1
1
10
277
Anonymous
13 January 2020 at 23:16
I have adopted a baby girl , 6 months old,under HAMA act from her biological parents. Registration deed has been done in subregistrer office, with court stamps, in the presence of biological and adoptive parents and 2 witness. I want to know if any other documents needed for legal adoption apart from registration deed
Anonymous
13 January 2020 at 22:07
my husband has filed a divorce petition against me. the petition is at the evidence stage. Now he has filed and application for returning of Ration card which is with me. But i don't want to give because he left me and now he has also committed second marriage and wanted to through me out from my matrimonial house pls help me with reply
Anonymous
13 January 2020 at 19:30
My brother in law is threatening that he will kidnap and kill my daughter in property issue.
I am very frustrated and afraid even to send her to school.
Kindly advise me what to do and whom to contact.
santosh
13 January 2020 at 17:45
I have Submitted Income Tax Return A.Y.-2019-2 on Dt. 31.08.2019 showing Income Rs. 317000/- and e verified on 24.12.2019. Thereafter I filed a revised I.T. Return on Dt. 24.12.2019 and showing Income Rs. 340000/-. Thereafter I got Intimation U/s 143(1) on Dtd. 13.01.2020 showing Penalty U/s 234F of Rs. 1000/-. I want to Know that an ITO can Impose Penalty U/s 234F in Revise Return or not ? Please Answer anyone Thanks & Regards.
Anonymous
13 January 2020 at 12:14
Can i make Addendum to Partnership Deed for change in Name and Principle place of Business for Unregistered Partnership Deed and than apply for changes in PAN, having the same PAN No.
Can u also guide me with section no. of Partnership Act which does talk about the same, if any.
Ravichandra
13 January 2020 at 12:05
Hi Sir,
I lost my cheque book. But I have not signed on them. I have informed it to bank.
Anything else I need to do for this ? Kindly educate. Thanks.
Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh
12 January 2020 at 22:55
Sir,
A writ petition was filed in 2015 by a firm and the petitioner himself in respect to a land which was divided by Consent Term and Agreement in 1987. The Petitioner holds 10% share in the firm. As the Respondents were trying to develop the said land without the permission and consent of the Petitioner, the Petitioner filed Writ Petition. The Petitioner had prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the MCGM to earmark the plot of the Petitioner. Behind the back of the Petitioner, the Respondent was succesful in getting the 10% share of the Petitioner from the Petitioners divorced wife through MOU and rest 90% through the partners of the firm. The Petitioner expired in 2017. Thereafter the wife of the Petitioner filed Chamber Summons to implead herself as Petitioner 1-A in the said Writ Petition. The matter reached in June 2018, the Hon'ble COurt dismissed by stating that the Petitioner is trying to establish rights and share by writ petition and directed to file suit for the same.
Here, I would like to say that the rights of the petitioner firm and petitioner were already established by Consent Term and Agreement between the parties. The fraud committed by the Respondent in dealing with the divorced wife of the Petitioner in 2013 was highlighted before the MCGM authority. Several complaints were filed but it was all in vain. Apart from vague replies nothing relevant or concrete reply was received by the wife of the deceased Partner/Petitioner. The wife of the deceased Petitioner also informed that the fraud shall be highlighted before the court.
So now in such case, what legal remedy is with the wife of the deceased partner/Petitioner? Can she file Writ against MCGM for not reacting to the complaints and/or fraud committed by the Respondent to get the plans sanctioned to develop the said land and for issuing irrelevant orders? Or the wife should file a Suit against the builder/developer? Legally, 10% share of the deceased partner/petitioner is still intact. The Complaint has been submitted with the LOKAYUKTA, Maharashtra, but no reply yet.
Please advice experts.
Mohammed Rizwan
JTONPR
12 January 2020 at 21:32
Which public authority keeps NRC 1951 list in Uttar Pradesh.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can ito levy penalty u/s 234f in revise income tax return?
sir how can ito levy penalty u/s 234F as my original return filed in prescribed time period i.e. 31.08.2019 of Income tax Return A.Y.-2019-20.As per rule of Income tax If i filed my return in time then there is no provision to levy penalty in Revise Return. Please answer in details.
Thanks & Regards