ancientalien
25 July 2014 at 19:24
Dear Friends,
I am facing a problem regarding compensation from Social Welfare Department.:(
* A compensation of more than 50 lakhs was to be given to a society by Social Welfare Department (Samaj Kalyan Vibhag)
* The compensation was to be paid in the year 2011-12 in lieu of SC/ST students admitted in the said year.
Reason for non-compensation: Real one -The hefty amount of bribe was denied by the college management.
* The officer never suggested anything in written but told the management that it is now mandatory for the students to appear in the exams to be eligible for the compensation or Fee -Reimbursement. He further asserted that it was a law passed in the year 2012-13 hence not applicable to any previous batch. But everybody is clueless regarding this issue.
Response of Management: The college management (Secretary) is ready to take guarantee that all the students were studying (With adequate proofs). In case any discrepancy is found later on then he is ready to face punishment as per law.
Losses & Damage sustained due to non-reimbursement:
College could not pay the examination fees for those students. Resulting in the loss of a whole year of the students where right to education was violated due to the negligence of Government.
Salary of lecturers and expenditures on resources was borne by the College Management for those students.
OBJECTIVE: I am looking forward for a Lawyer well experienced in such compensation related matters.
FEE: Rs. 1,00,000/- will be paid to the lawyer for acquiring the order of the high court instructing the Social Welfare Department to release the fee-reimbursement. Where the secretary of the college is ready to take all the responsibilities in case of discrepancies. (Other colleges have already taken the orders from Social Welfare Department regarding this issues)
rahul
25 July 2014 at 18:42
madam/sir,
my relative is in j/c for 6 months & charged u/s 326, 307 of ipc. the custodial trial was scheduled to begin in the last month. however, neither complainant nor any witness named in C/Sheet appeared in court. thus the trial did not took place. previously 1 month ago we approached to H.C for bail, but it was rejected saying that the trial shall begin. however now it has crossed more than 6 months in j/c.
therefore, I wanted to know whether now again we can approach to session court or High court for bail or not. what are the legal options at this stage. plz suggest.
kunhi marakkar
25 July 2014 at 18:36
sir,
what is the procedure of cancellation of a deed which registered 10 years back?reason is the deed contain a lot of mistakes which cannot rectify.both party are agreed to cancel it.but how can do this?
savinay
25 July 2014 at 18:28
In Complaint (government) case original documents are lost.so application to lead secondary evidence is submitted before honorable court. What ways defence can oppose it. What representation prosecution has to Put forth. Xerox copies already filed in court. Pl guide.
As I m not law graduate, excuse me if the query is substandard.
kunhi marakkar
25 July 2014 at 18:24
sir,
i am youngest member of a muslim family in kerala. during partition of my deceased father's property, can i get any preferance under ultimogeniture law?
rgrds,
naushad
N.Damodaram Naidu
25 July 2014 at 18:18
Dear all,
I borrowed a sum of Rs.300000/- from a known person on 10th March 2011. The money lender took a blank signed cheque and a blank signed promissory note. Then I have repaid in several installments Rs.568000/-. But The lender did not give me any acknowledgement of receipt of money and also did not give back the cheque and pronote of me and started harassing to pay money additionally by calculating Rs.6/- interest per month. Hence I gave a police complaint with all facts on 22/06/2014 and got receipt in proof of complaint. The police inspector took a written statement from the lender not to harass me hereafterwards on 23/06/2014.
After that the money lender handed over the cheque to another person who is unknown person to me and residing at some other far place which is 400 kms away. He filled the blank cheque for Rs.780000/- and presented for collection on 27/06/2014 and the cheque was bounced. They send a legal notice to me demanding the payment of Rs.780000/-.
Now the question is can I prove the age difference of ink between signature and other contents in the cheque and pronote through forensic examination? Can I defend my self with the ink difference on the cheque and pronote?
respected sir,
THE PRINCIPLE OF LAW APPLICABLE IN THIS CASE IS THAT SO LONG A PROPERTY REMAINS IN THE HANDS OF A SINGLE PERSON, THE SAME WAS TO BE TREATED AS A SEPARATE PROPERTY AND THUS , WOULD BE ENTITLED TO DISPOSE OF THE COPARCENARY PROPERTY AS SAME WERE HIS SEPARATE PROPERTY, BUT , IF A SON IS SUBSEQUENTLY BORN TO HIM OR ADOPTED BY HIM, THE ALIENATION WHETHER IT IS BY WAY OF SALE, MORTGAGE OR GIFT,WILL NEVERTHELESS STAND, FOR A SON CANNOT OBJECT TO ALIENATION SO MADE BY HIS FATHER BEFORE HE WAS BORN OR BEGOTTEN.
BUT ONCE A SON IS BORN, IT BECOMES A COPARCENARY PROPERTY AND HE WOULD ACQUIRE AN INTEREST THEREIN.
Q1.ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE PRINCIPLE THE FATHER WAS EXECUTED THE SALE DEED IN THE YEAR 1970.THE SON OF THE EXECUTENT CAN HAVE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE SALE DEED FOR CANCELLATION AS SON WAS BORN IN THE YEAR 1954 AS THE CASE WAS PENDING BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT.AS SECTION 6(1) OF HINDU SUCCESSION ACT AND OLD HINDU LAW CAN APPLY HERE SIR. (CITATION C.KRISHNA PRASAD V. C.I.T., BANGALORER)
Q2. IN THE ABOVE QUERY WHAT IS THE MEANING OF "NEVERTHELESS STAND SIR". SALE DEED IS VALID OR NOT SIR.
THANKING YOU SIR
PLS GIVE ME VALUABLE SUGGESTION .
Ckp005
25 July 2014 at 17:21
I have purchased a property in Pune, Dhanori area, having three building A, B and C. between A and B building there is 50 feet gap and it has been covered to provide parking. The roof of this parking is shared by corner flats (4 flats) of A and B apartment. Builder has approval for covered parking and have approval for flat -now what he is trying to do is open one room from each flat in these terrace and sell the terrace. He said he will include 50% of terrace area in agreement and will show the flat along with the terrace in the agreement. He is saying that since flat is approved, parking roof is approved -he can include it! Intially he was saying he will give "Right to use" fro terrace but when i questioned about its legality, he said he will include it in agreement which will clear any legal doubt!! I really liked the flat, construction quality, location -so very much keen on buying it so am seeking feedback -more so a practical one.
anurag
25 July 2014 at 17:11
Dear Sir,
My grandfather had a house at our native place which he gave it to my father through a registered will.Now how can we transfer the titles of the house in the name of my father.
Will there be some property tax or ant other expenses to get it transferred.
Please suggest
Thanking you
Sincerely
Anurag
Section 36 of i.d.act
Dear Sirs,
Whether an employee who is a legal executive of a company having LLB,LLM qualification can represent a labour case as an authorised representative of company
thanks