If the evidences been already enclosed with main petition at the first stage then is there a need to again attach these with the affidavit for evidences at the third stage when the court order for producing evidences?
Sanjay
17 December 2014 at 16:57
Respected Sir,
Here is my case and case status:
I reside in Madurai, Tamil Nadu and filed an RCOP case in the year 2009 against my tenant for vacation just because I need the space for my own use. The tenant also confessed in the court that he owns a shop near by and has rented out. The Addl. District Munsiff court awarded
the judgement in my favour, after 6 long years. We are yet to receive the judgement order.
I also came to know that the tenant is planning to go for an appeal just to prolong the process and remain in the premises.
I am in bad need of the space since I am unemployed and wanted to use this premise to setup my own business.
My lawyer is too busy dealing with high value cases and its unfortunate that he is not paying full attention into our case.
(a) Can you please guide me on what are all the options do I have and what are the implications of choosing those?
(b) Is there an option that stops the tenant from going for appeal, before which he needs to vacate the premises?
(c) How do I make him vacate the premises?
Any suggestion helps!
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP!!
Am Very Desperate!
Regards,
Sanjay
Dear Sir,
A flat has been transferred in the name of unmarried daughter of the deceased mother in pursuant to the Will submitted by the unmarried daughter without probation in the society. The deceased mother had 2 sons and 5 daughters, out of which one 4 were married and one was unmarried as legal heirs. The Secretary without the knowledge of the Chairman and MC, signed on the Share Certificate and handed over to the applicant. The
Can the said transfer of the flat be considered legal and valid?
Does Secretary has power to sign the share certificate in his individual capacity, as he failed to bring this issue in the MC or SGBM?
What actions can be taken against the Secretary?
Remedy to amend the Share Certificate legal way, as the legal heirs are objecting on the said transfer?
Regards,
Rizwan Shaikh
Member (Account Deleted)
17 December 2014 at 15:51
I want to complein Adultory agst my wife and involve with him..
i used dummy email name with the related persons to get detail of phisical relation...that person threat me to complain agst me for cyber laws???
Police told me to get order from court for investigation... in ahmedabad can i send complain to court by r.ad post and any specified formet required...???if so pls send me format for same..
Amar
17 December 2014 at 15:13
Dear sir,
I am a complainant in a ni act case where accused are appear get bail and gave plea. After this MM gave order to us for filing for evidence and I filed our all evidence on affidavit on dated 05/07/2014.
But after supreme court Judgement dated 01/08/2014 our court is transfer our case but some confusion ( our case stage 145(2)) it is pending now.
Gujrat High Cout gave a judgement dated 01/12/2014 regarding 145(2). Hon. Judge also so confuse in his judgement. Supreme Court say two line in his judgement that “recording of evidence has commenced as envisaged in Section 145(2) and ”proceedings have gone to the stage of section 145(2) or beyond”
Gujrat High Court judgement :-
When the Supreme Court says the “recording of evidence has commenced as envisaged in Section 145(2)” only means that the cross examination has actually begun. If the complainant is yet to step in the box for the purpose of cross-examination by the accused then those cases according to me are covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court. To put it in other words such type of cases should be transferred. I do appreciate that if I have to consider only the interpretation of the words “proceedings have gone to the stage of section 145(2) or beyond” then probably the learned counsel appearing for the complainant may be right, but at the same time I should not ignore the first part of para-22 which makes it very clear that the recording of evidence should have actually commenced as envisaged in section 145(2). There is a fine distinction between the term “has commenced” and “have gone to the stage of section 145(2)”. But for the words “the recording of evidence has commenced” I would have probably disagreed with the learned Magistrate.
I am of the view that the learned Magistrate is right inreturning the complaints to the complainant for being filed/refilled before the competent court having jurisdiction totry the offence.
1st In this condition please tell what is the stage of my case.
2nd what can I do in our case because I am not in position that I go that place where drawee bank.
3rd I am alone person and what can I do?
tapan sahu
17 December 2014 at 15:05
Sir
If we are four brothers and my father disowned his son ,the disowned stays separately in his own house and we three brother are in the hindu undivided family stay in the same house after my father can the disowned son can acquire the father property or does he have any right with ours individuals property or fathers property
Please suggest me
Thanks & Regards
amit
17 December 2014 at 14:41
Respected Experts,
My wife has given false information in affidavit filed in the DV Act case against us.I have filed application u/s 340 against her.Now she has shifted from the address that she has given in the court and her lawyer is not accepting the summon issued by the court.Her current address is not tracable.How can we serve the summon to her in this situation.
Regards,
Amit.
Mehajabin
17 December 2014 at 14:38
I had completed my graduation from Lotus Bausch & Lomb Institute of Optometry at Coimbatore. After graduation we were told and signed to do compulsory bond for 1 year. But as i was pregnant i could do at that time and postponed it to the next year. However, after 1 year the institue cancelled the bond for all. But they are insisting me to do the bond or to pay Rs 120000. All my 10th and 12th certificates are with them and they are not returning
I know that the management is playing andthey have already given the certificates to some students even without paying or without completeing the bond.
Please advise me on how to get my certificates. If i can legally complaint aginst this and how long the process will take.
Mehajabin
17 December 2014 at 14:35
I had completed my graduation from Lotus Bausch & Lomb Institute of Optometry at Coimbatore. After graduation we were told and signed to do compulsory bond for 1 year. But as i was pregnant i could do at that time and postponed it to the next year. However, after 1 year the institue cancelled the bond for all. But they are insisting me to do the bond or to pay Rs 120000. All my 10th and 12th certificates are with them and they are not returning
I know that the management is playing andthey have already given the certificates to some students even without paying or without completeing the bond.
Please advise me on how to get my certificates. If i can legally complaint aginst this and how long the process will take.
Is driving an open top four wheeler prohibited by law?
On this particular occassion, my friend was harrassed by the police because he was driving an open Jeep- with some lady friends.
He had been driving around the same neighbourhood for about two hours, when they were stopped by two police men (one a Home Guard with a police radio, who made some rude remarks of his driving with his lady friends). The police asked to see license and registration papers and asked them if they had been drinking. They had not been, and all papers were in order. They were allowed to leave after what seemed an un necessary and deliberate delay.
When they returned from a nearby restaurant later, my friend found a parking ticket on the Jeep. A traffic cop had fined only this vehicle, even though there were other vehicles in front and behind this one, parked bumper to bumper. On asking why he was booked, the policeman was confrontational, and said that they deserved the parking fine and if the vehicle is again seen driving around, he will further be charged with public nuisence for driving an open top vehicle.
My friend didn't want a scene and so left, eventhough he knew he had not broken any laws of the land.
Later he called me and asked whether the MV act had such a clause, one prohibiting open- top four wheel driving. I didn't know, so asked around but couldn't get a clear answer, even from the police themselves- who were very vague and contradictory. Googled this query much, again to no avail.
Thought I'd put this across to the experts here.
Can you help?