rahul
14 February 2015 at 22:21
a lady wrongly register fir u/s 509 on me, in new delhi.
police arrested me and on same day i get police bail hence u/s 509 is bailable offence
but one year passed, till now police doesnt filled a chargesheet.
should i contact the police station for filling the chargesheet??
one advocate told me for filling a chargesheet , time limit is 3 year in u/s 509.
what i have to do, get out from this problem?? kindly give advice
Pawan Joshi
14 February 2015 at 21:35
Sir, My Car is insured under comprehensive cover with Maruti Insurance
My car was parked near my house. Some miscreants breaked the car window glass and stolen the battery fitted in the car including other damages.
I have duly filed the FIR in the Police Station having jurisdication about the theft of Battery.
Now the insurance company is rejecting the claim that the if the whole car would have stolen, that is covered under the insurance, but if a specific part is stolen that is not covered under the insurance.
I find it out of logic and unjustified and am not sure how much the insurance company is correct in rejecting the claim.
I need some expert opinion, whether I should insist on my claim or the insurer is justified in rejecting the claim.
Thanks
sir
after several adjournments due to absence of plaintiff evidence, ultimately the case has been dismissed by the court. The case is related to forged agreement of sale and managed by the plaintiff for about 4 years. In such case of dismissal, plaintiff intend to proceed for appeal and what is the time period avaialble to plaintiff for filing appeal in higher court. in case appeal filed how long it will take.
Adv M.D.Azhar
14 February 2015 at 21:07
sir, i need to know that "A" advocate has instituted a suit in the civil court. Meanwhile injunction application was rejected therefore appeal was preferred before the session court. Now plaintiff and defendant decided to compromise the matter so plaintiff "A" without informing his advocate and the defendant & his advocate without informing the "A" s concern advocate. Specially defendant's adv filed memo that compromised is done that's why he want to withdraw the matter while he is the advocate of the defendant. Can he do so? Not only that but also in the civil court defendant's adv given the application before the court to taken up the matter on the board, which was granted by the civil court and also withdrawn a suit by passing a memo in about which neither the the parties nor the advocate of the defendant or the court drawn the attention of the advocate of the plaintiff. No signature was taken on the memo moreover plaintiff who has to be identified in the matter of compromise by his advocate, he was identified by the adv of the defendants. Now if this kind of procedure is done just because parties and the adv of the defendant do not wanted to pay the fees to plaintiff's adv. What action may be taken against the parties or the adv of the defendant? please guide me in this matter.
Cejo Marcose
14 February 2015 at 20:16
Sir,
I have applied for the post of Stenographer against the office order of the office of Conservator of Forests (HQ), vide no. (F.20(E)/13) dt. 12-8-2013 for the post of Stenographer (OG) 4 no. (General -2 & OBC– 2) in the Dept. of Environment of Forest, A & N Islands, accordingly a written examination was held by Forest Dept. on 01-06-2014.
That as per written examination for the Posts of Stenographer conducted by Dept. of Forests, A & N Islands, and Twelve (12) candidates was qualified/selected for trade examination (typing & shorthand), accordingly the written examination qualified candidate called for trade examination on 20-09-2014
That as per press release on Daily Telegram dt. 22-01-2015 out of Twelve Candidates only four candidates was called for interview on 11-02-2015 whereas the existing vacancy is also 4 nos, and there is no cut off marks prescribed for written test, under such circumstances the waiting panel for the said existing panel is not possible and also it is clear that all the 4 candidates were who selected for interview is also select because the vacancy is four only....
That i had given a written objection to the Principle chief conservator of Forests of Forest Dept. stating that the recruitment process for the post of Stenographer which have been adapted by the dept. was totally illogical & also requested that the Interview for vacancies for post of Stenographer may conducted after calling all the eligible candidates who passed in the written exam, so that reserve waiting panel should be made.
But unfortunately my objection was not considered by PCCF of Forest Dept. and the interview was carried out on 11-2-2015.
That up to the written exam it was ok for me becoz the ratio for 4 no. vacancy is 1:3 ratio that is for 4 post 12 candidates were selected. but in trade exam for the said post the result was 1 :1 ratio that is for 4 no. post 4 candidates were selected.
Generally all the interview for any requirements the said forest dept. was followed the ratio method like 1: 2, 1:3, & 1:4.
in this regard i want to stay the illogical/ arbitrary interview process which have been followed in the recruitment process for the post of stenographer, so that the forest dept. calling all the eligible candidates who passed in the written exam, so that reserve waiting panel should be made.
pls help me....
Member (Account Deleted)
14 February 2015 at 20:07
Dear sir
My late husband has a house in delhi.
His conduct was foul with me and I was working with defense department aND POPSTED OUT SIDE ALWAYS.Taking advantage of this all, his brother got a will from him in favour of his children for the flat.
I was not notified for probate and after my contest probate was rejected.
Now case is pending for suit for possession and declaring will null and void.
The case is hanging in Delhi court since 2008.
I am about to retire. The brother and his children are occupying the flat without any legal stand. I want that court give interim possession to me for atleast one room till decision.is it possible to seek such relief under my pending suit? Because it may take another 3 years for judgment and then he may go in appeal.
Mahendri Kumari
My father had purchased one house during 1962-65 (with his own money - there was no contribution from our Mother [Mother is housewife = not earning member] and elder brother or any one) at Jamnagar in the name of my mother as tradition to buy property in the name of wife. My father has made a will and it indicates equal part for three brothers (Not anything for the 2 sisters as he mentioned that he has already given enough to them). My father was in the Bank as a Manager and my mother was Housewife. At present my father and after mother have expired. My mother has informed every one before she expired that this property will be equal for three brothers. Now, after sometime elder brother comes out with will which is only in his favor and denied to share anything to the remaining two brothers. All family members taken objection and on base of this City Survey office has not register his(Only one name ) name in property card. IssueMy elder brother is also passed away. Before my elder brother died he has made one agreement Dastavej sale of this house to someone. Sale transaction amount is 20.Lacs. Official vale is 4. Cr. This will and Sale transaction both are doubtful.My question is:
Who are the real owner?
Is this Benami transaction?
If yes then under which clause?
Can the remaining two brothers get the share in this property?
If yes then under which clause or Section?
Is legally father's WILL Valid? Document of house is in the Mother. Under which clause?
Is legally mother's WILL Valid? Document of house is in the Mother. Under which clause?
RANJAN
14 February 2015 at 18:27
Can I file review of single judge order on disclosure of new evidence appeal is pending
shrivaishnavmukund
14 February 2015 at 17:45
Scenario:
An Forest Land was occupied by advasi, then he sold the forest land to all 20 people, who in turn made slums.
Name of advasi was there on 7/12 Extracts but not on property card.
They showed the Dispute among the family members, hence one brother and sister sold the entire part of land to 20 People.
The other brother filed a civil Suit in court against her sister and those 20 people as they have committed trespass.
The Suit was not followed, and was dismissed. hence City Survey office made property card for Advasi.
The matter is 35 years old.
As we are of Nomadic tribe, hence our land was sub divided, and made non agriculture land. rest of land is Agriculture land with Slums made all over it.
The Advasi Sister transferred the part of land in name of my father who was also Nomadic tribe.
I have Property card, having name on it, i pay property tax, and have paid all revenue tax from past 35 years.
agreement and deed of conveyance is registered separately at different interval.
My question:
Is my land transfer legal?
issues:
the land owner is not allowing me to conduct repair of my house and survey of my plot, he is using third party force and threatening my family for our life. like instigating some people to come in my house, throw big stones on my house. verbally telling us that he will kill us.
What should i do ?
Kindly Respond
jurisdiction matter
After girl side witness has completed in court in matter of 498a case husband finds that case is running in wrong jurisdiction only becoz of girl false statement that last misbehave is made in x city of your jurisdiction while there is nothing done in x city all incidents relating to y city can he pray to dismiss the case for wrong jurisdiction?i know that he has to prove also about nothing in x city only belonging to y city.