Francis
17 February 2015 at 12:27
The first name has been wrongly spelt in the estamp paper for Agreement of sale for immovable property. However, the surname and joint holders name is correctly spelt. Will this have any implication on the validity of the document? Does the same need to be rectified? If so, what is the process.
nitin
17 February 2015 at 11:17
From where I can get certified copy of list of tenants in a plot in mumbai area ? I am a resident in mumbai and have a shop of which I am tenant. I want list of tenants from where to get it?
Which office to apply and to whom ?
PLS help urgent my complete earnings are at stake urgent reply appreciated....!!!!
This is private property.....& inspection of property bills donot have my name, but owners have collected timely rents from me and also issued rent receipts......
DAYASAGAR MEHER
17 February 2015 at 09:45
That a temple was established in our village (state - Odisha) about 160 years back and around 100 acers of land was donated to the temple by the 'MAHARAJA' of the district at that time.
That the resonsibility of worship was given to a Priest and since then the priest and their family continue to cultivate the land and worship in temple.
As per the endowment law the priest can't sell the land of temple, but in 1980 some land of temple was registered illegally in the name of the family of the priest and those were sold out by their family.
There was a huge breakout of breach of peace at that time and because of the influence of some of powerful persons of the district in their favor, no action was taken against them in spite of several complaints.
The rest of the land around 50 acres, is still being cultivated and used by them for their personal purposes and not a single penny they are using for temple. Temple being managed by the money collected from the public.
Several letters were sent to assistant commissioner of endowment to form a permanent trust for temple and to free the land from the hereditary encrochers but to no result. It is also rumoured that with the influence of some MP/MLAS they have formed a hereditary trust in their name (with the consent of assistant commissioner) for the purpose of grabbing the land, but reality is unknown as yet.
How to solve the problem to form a permanent trust.
Is there any way to obtain information, whether an illegal hereditary trust was formed.
sunil
17 February 2015 at 02:00
1st week of May 2014, I made (another) police complaint of trespassing when “D” entered in one portion of our rental place by breaking and changing padlocks.
At the time of reporting my written complaint at PS the same IO who handled previous two 144(2) cases informed that there is another 144(2) case (DvsS) been filed by “D” in last week of April 2014 against me (“S”)
A FIR case was registered u/s 448 IPC and after 5 days a Summon u/s 91 was issued and handed over by another IO which I complied within 7 days time with giving relevant documents with a covering letter submitted at PS.
From the police report of 144(2) case (DvsS) filed by the IO in Sep 2014 I came to know that there is a FIR case u/s 506 / 509 IPC filed 2 days after my FIR registered u/s 448 IPC and a charge sheet already submitted in last week of July 2014. The GR case was filed showing me as “absconding” and a warrant is already issued.
After Puja vacation “Recall” procedure completed in last week of Oct 2014.
In the mean time FRT has been filed for FIR registered u/s 448 IPC.
The IO in both FIR cases is same and he NEVER informed for FIR against me as well FRT report filed for my FIR u/s 448 IPC.
Brief History:
I “S” filed a 144(2) (SvsK) complaint in July 2013 against “K” one of my partners, “M” representative of landlords, “D” 3rd party buyer, “T” broker in the deals and “B” another person using our place as godown when one of my partners “K” tried to divide one portion of our rental property for the purpose of "selling" and handing over to “D”.
At the time of submission of Order copy for 144(2) (SvsK) to local PS the officer informed that there is another 144(2) order for a case (NvsS) filed by “K” on behalf of some company named “N” (later disclosed in the Police Report that “K”s wife is proprietor of “N”)
In August 2013 police report was filed for 144(2) (SvsK).
In Oct 2013 police report was filed for 144(2) (NvsS)
Interestingly both the Police Reports are identical and filed by same IO. In the name of inquiry all sorts of lies and contradicting statements were recorded.
I filed a RTI query for 144(2) (NvsS) to know on what grounds / documents IO has filed identical PR when the complainant and respondents are different and having no business relations, the reply says “In course of enquiry, SI, inspected documents produced by the petitioner “K and OP “S” and returned those after inspection. He prepared report based on inspection of documents, local enquiry and interaction with both the parties.”
Since July 2013; time to time I filed complaint letters along with photographs showing vandalism and destruction of my property and belonging as and when incidents happened but no action was taken against my OPs.
I have tried to give all vital information, please indicate if any thing is missing in forming your suggestion(s).
My query is: What options are available to me to save myself and also to expose nexus of my opponents with corrupt authorities?
Thanks
Abi
17 February 2015 at 00:09
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am planning to buy a residential property from NRI Gentleman in Pune. As I understand if the property agreement value is more than 50LK I am required to deduct 1% TDS from the agreed amount and credit the rest to Seller. The NRI has provided his PAN card details and has NRO account with ICICI bank. Now bank is asking seller (NRI) to pay some 20% tax and asking me (buyer) to obtain letter from CA of seller about his tax liabilities. The whole matter is pretty confusing. I request expert opinion on following:
1. How much TDS needs to be paid to IT department for this transaction?
2. Who needs to bear this tax for which TDS needs to be paid/cut? Seller or Buyer?
3. NRI gentleman has PAN card and he shared the same as well. Is there anything more the Seller needs to take care in terms of Tax?
4. Is there any consent letter kind of thing is suggested from Seller or CA of Seller in this regard?
5. Appreciate if the GR/Circular of such transaction also can be made available for reference.
6. What is the capital gain tax rule applicable to Seller, considering seller is NRI and dont file IT returns in India?
Thanks in anticipation of help.
Kind Regards,
Abi
Nagraj
16 February 2015 at 23:01
Dear sir/madam,
Though I have read many discussion on this subject I need some more clarification. I am currently working in an organization signing a service agreement of 2 years with penalty of 2Lakhs and I also have gone through a training period during which I was paid some stipend amount. Recently I attended an interview and cleared it which violates the terms of the agreement. And in background verification of the new company they may contact my present company in which case I might be terminated from the company by paying the penalty as mentioned above. After terminating will they give me the relieving letter which I can produce to new company and join. And is terminating different from Resigning. Below are some of the necessary terms of agreement on this query.
If the Employee leaves the employment of the Company or brings about a situation as referred above, during Service Period, the Employee undertakes and agrees unconditionally to pay, on demand, to the Company, a sum of Rs 2 Lakhs as pre-estimated liquidated damages as compensation for the breach of the terms of this Agreement. The Company may also, in addition, demand a quantified damages for loss of business opportunities, negative growth in the business, if any.
Thanks in advance.
nitin
16 February 2015 at 22:37
From where I can get certified copy of list of tenants in a plot in mumbai area ? I am a resident in mumbai and have a shop of which I am tenant. I want list of tenants from where to get it?
Which office to apply and to whom ?
PLS help urgent my complete earnings are at stake urgent reply appreciated....!!!!
This is private property.....& inspection of property bills donot have my name, but owners have collected timely rents from me and also issued rent receipts......
mayank
16 February 2015 at 22:27
Dear Sir,
we were doing business with two firms proprietor ship belonging to father son duo each. we gave them material against PDC's given at the time of delivery as agreed terms of 60 days in 60 days cycle almost goods worth rs 18-19 lakh were given on getting PDC we started producing PDC but it started bouncing but for few payments were made like 1 lakh 1.25 lakh but eventually. they started buying time saying the owner has met with an accident, almost 1 month passed then some other excuse like father is hospitalized etc etc .. in Good faith we kept waiting since few payments of 1-2 lakhs were made during this period. as a support we waited but all the cheques bounced. we never sent any notice to parties yet but almost 8-9 months have passed and payment of almost 14 lakh is out standing and party is not responsing properly. we are worried now pls advise what sholc be our action. we have PDC's of almost 18-19 lakh in both the companies but all bounced.
we got tricked and never sent notice to them uptill now. since they were communicating and we thought the payment will be made.
pls advise what should we do. since although we have bounced PDC but 8-9 moths has passes does those PDC hold any value. and how should we go for recovery ? also we have intrest loss of almost 1.8 lakh and lot of harasment due to non response and abrupt response from customer.
pls advise.
regrds,
Mick
Member (Account Deleted)
16 February 2015 at 22:08
How electricity bill can be address proof for passport where as it has only name?
kindly explain
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maintainability of simple money suit based on regd. mortgage deed.
Whether a simple money suit is maintainable, without seeking any relief for redemption of Registered mortgage deed executed by borrower in favour of lendor is maintainable?