Shantanu
28 April 2015 at 01:01
my uncle was a civil court employee, he got retired two years before. while in service there was some issue with a file which got misplaced, however there was no loss to system and anybody. the file was newly replaced. however, some disciplinary actions were initiated against seven persons who were posted there or related with the matter. no action was taken till the retirement of my uncle and now they have stopped his pension and other monetary benefits. i just wanted to ask whether this action is in accordance with law, disciplinary proceedings are still pending. if not then how can i help my uncle.....whether he will get his pension and monetary benefits.
Hasham
28 April 2015 at 00:51
Hi Team,
One of my friend has bought loan vehicle commercial (Yellow Board) from first party, thinking that he will be able to convert the vehicle immediately from Yellow Board to white Board, since it is a loan vehicle conversion could not happened. Then he sold his vehicle to another person, unfortunately that 3rd person did not pay EMI to the bank and banker has siezed the vehicle.
Now my fried while buying the vehicle had made one agreement with first owner was that he will pay the EMI, and he will have all the right on vehicle to do whatever he (My friend) can do.
My friend i worried based on the agreement legally does he held guilty. and to overcome this problem need your suggestion.
Regards
Suhail T
RAMA MURTHY
28 April 2015 at 00:09
I am having a pending sp performence suit from 2003 The agreement GPA is dated oct 1985 in which full sale consideration is paid and possession taken and The sale deed could not be executed due to ban on registration revenue sites up to 1991 and after wards the owner ship of the suit schedule property was in dispute between some false claimants and and the seller in which I was also made as a defendant by a suit filed by those claimants which has been contested by me also This suit was dismissed in 2002 and the sellers refused to execute sale deed
During 1990 the seller had expired and his elder son was looking after the properties The seller had wife two sons and four daughters who were married at the time of his death
In the year 2001 During the pendency of the above suit filed by above false claimants of suit property the Wife and two sons of seller fraudulently sold the suit property to another buyer noticed only during 2004
Now the suit is filed making the sellers wife and two sons as defendants along with subsequent buyers Now I request the elite legal community to enlighten mewheather to bring all the four daughters also on record as defendants or not and possible consequeness
Gayatridevi
28 April 2015 at 00:08
The case is under section 497 of IPC. The complainant is mother in law of accused (her daughter in law) who has lodged the complaint on behalf of her son as he residing in abroad. The present stage of the case is in verification and process issue argument. The evidence on record are missing complaint and flight boarding passed of the accused along with her boyfriend. It seems to be that the evidences are not sufficient to put up the strong case and to attract 497 on the daughter in law. Could you please help me to identify the applicable evidences so that this case can be put up strongly in the 497 of IPC.
harsha
27 April 2015 at 23:58
I had taken a property through a court auction for x amount and paid a stamp duty of rs 100 (all dd including the stamp duty & auction amount in 2 separate dd in favour of the local judge/court )the stamp duty dd has been remitted to a treasury from the court . the court also gave the sale certificate .
now the case was challenge in the high court by the property owner and I decided compromise to set a side the sale from the lower court. now the court is not giving the stamp duty paid by me and agreed to pay only my amount x.
how can I ask for the refund of my stamp duty please let me know .....
Raj
27 April 2015 at 22:52
Sir,
This relates to my cosuin service matter case which is pending before the High court for last 3 years..In one of the appellate court, the service matter was posted for final disposal and there are many petitioners joined together as co petitioners and the court has posted for final disposal...but certain new facts has come and for this impleadmnet of Governing body who is the union minsiter of cabinet needs to be required..
Please inform whether impleadment at thsi stage is advisable before the appellate court??
Thangakalai
27 April 2015 at 22:49
I am writing this message on behalf of Advocate Mr. T. Kalaiselvan, a member of this prestigious club, who due to some technical reasons is not able to access his account for the past two days. His password is locked due to some mistake hence he opted for resetting password by using "Password forgot option", the message received says YOUR PASSWORD HAS BEEN RESET AND MAILED SUCCESSFUL” whereas he has not received the same till this moment, in fact all his efforts to restore his account failed to bear any fruit. He is stranded and unable to think about what can be done next. Since he could not succeed in his attempt, he is unable to operate his account with his password remaining locked or jammed. He is worried about not able to access and help the forum as well as the needy with his services, hope somebody will take up this issue immediately with Admin and help him set right his problem by messaging Team Admin because even my Private messages to LCI admin failed to invoke any response so far, neither the Admin team is bothered about to look into its inbox for the messages from its members. The experts are requested to support the fellow expert Adv. T. Kalaiselvan to restore and operate his account by pressurising the team LCI Admin.
SS
27 April 2015 at 22:15
Sir, My WP is unable to get listed/reach in spite of submitting MEMO of POSTING. The matter requires/needs to come on board to facilitate my old parents, of essential amenity.Adv also expressed helplessness.
Please guide.
Lalnunmawia Sailo
27 April 2015 at 21:57
Dear Expert,
The O.M. No.11012/11/2007-Estt. (A) dated 14.12.2007, according to Para-7 provides that:
"7. Vigilance clearance will not normally be granted for a period of three years after the currency of the punishment, if a minor penalty has been imposed on an officer."
In the meantime, letter No. 25165/S/98-1 dt 10.6.1998 clarified that:
“The punishment of censure has no currency. Whenever an officer is ....... etc”.
My query is :
If an officer has been imposed with a minor penalty of "Censure", but one year later needs Vigilance Clearance to be appointed as Member of Regulatory Commission.
(1) Can Vigilance Clearance be granted to him irrespective of Para 7 above, on the ground that 'Punishment of Censure has no currency'?
(2) Or Vigilance Clearance can not be granted to him in line with Para 7, for a period of three years, reckoning the period of three years (0+3)from the date minor penalty was imposed on the officer? (Understanding that punishment of censure is a codified and formal punishment).
Pl tell me what to follow. I hope I explain the problem clear for you this time to enable you to give reply?
Lalnunmawia Sailo
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Surname mismatch in sale deed of inherited property
we are living in a house which is in the name of my grandfather. He expired two years back. He registered his last will of this property in favour of my father in sub-registrar's office. The sale deed is in name of my grandfather. But there is a mismatch in the surname of my grandfather and my father. My grandfather's surname was "Maindiratta" and my father used to write his surname as "Mehdiratta".
My father is the only child of my grandparents.
Will this surname mismatch could create any issue in transferring the property in the name of my father?