DENNIS BOSCO DEMELLO
03 August 2015 at 14:28
Sir/Madam,
I have completed my graduation from private university (Regular) and Pursuing my LLB from govt university, will there be any problem in enrolling in Bar Council ?
jyotsna
03 August 2015 at 14:28
Does Gaothan lands are mortgageable or not; and at what extend it caan mortgage??
waiting for fast reply...
AK New Delhi
03 August 2015 at 14:21
I am a permanent resident of New Delhi and in the year 2006 I purchased two builder's plots in Haridwar having concurrent numbers(twin plots of 100 yards each making into one big plot of 200 yards). The builder failed to deliver the plots. I filed a case against the builder at District Consumer Redressal Forum, Qutab Institutional area, Delhi and is listed for final argument.
I want to know whether the courts will entertain my plea as a "Consumer" because I have purchased twin plots in the same area?? or will it consider it a commercial deal??
Kuppan.K.S
03 August 2015 at 14:20
Whether departmental proceedings already initiated can be continued after removal of the employee from service?
Devinder Mohan Puri
03 August 2015 at 14:09
Dear Sir
I am in transferrable job. I transported my car by truck through a transporter and obtained receipt. I have come to know that transporter instead of loading in the truck drove the car to my destination. The car met with an accident when it dashed into a tree. I heard that someone who was in the car died. Driver survived.
I do not know what to do. I have seen the reports in the local newspaper that car dashed into a tree. What are my responsibilities/duties and what course of action should I take. Should I inform police in this regard.
Regards
harsha
03 August 2015 at 13:26
MR.A HAS TAKEN PROPERTY IN 1944 THROUGH a SALE DEED and transferred a part OF THE PROPERTY to his brother MR B & MR C in 1965 through a Katha transfer respectively.
NOW MR.B SOLD THE PROPERTY (only his land ) TO MR x THROUGH SALE DEED IN 2009
Q 1)IS THE MR X RIGHTS ARE CLEAR.
(NOTE SONS OF MR A , KNOWN THE ABOVE TRANCTION AND STAY IN ONE PART OF THE PROPERTY which belongs them.) THE PROPERTY IS KARNATAKA.
neelam
03 August 2015 at 13:24
gud afternoon..
Meri dadi ji ki death abhi kuch din pehle hui h hamari house property unke nam thi and is property k 4 log haqdar h. dadi k 4 bete h. 2 bete ground floor per rehte h or 2 bete first floor per. hum lof first floor per rehte h and uper ka portion kuch is tarah se bata h ki 6 room me se 3 room chachu k pas h and 3 room hamare pas. lekin angan common h even let/ bath ki galery bhi common h and bahar jane ka rasta bhi common h. chachu ab chahte h ki wo apna portion let out ker de coz wo kahi or reh rahe h. unhone apna portion lock ker rakha h.
hm ni chahte ki portion let out ho coz kafi area common h.
abhi property transfer ni hui h kisi k bhi nam. hum sirf hamare portion me reh rahe h bus.
mere ye questions h..
1. kya chahu hamari bina permission k property let out ker skte h?
2. agar jabardasti kirayedar rakhne lage to kya hum use rok sakte h? agar ha to kaise? hum kya procedure le sakte h iske lie?
3. meri 3 bua h kya wo bhi is property me baraber ki hissedar h? chachu and tau ji bua to hissa ni dena chahte.
4. propety apne nam per transfer karane k kya procedure h? and kya uske bad chahu apna portion let out ker skte h agar area common h to without our consent ?
please reply as aaj kal chahu ne preshan ker rakha h.
Thank you for your valuable time.
sandeep
03 August 2015 at 13:05
divorce was in 1999 on the basis of MC and one child was born before divorce in July 1997 and it was agreed by both the party that the female child born from the wedlock of the parties shall remain in the custody of the mother and the father shall not claim the custody of the said female child. there is no other term and /or condition and there is no other claim of any nature whatsoever.
Pls advise following :
1. Can father claim child custody if yes so under which article and how?
2. If father can't claim custody so can have any rights of meeting with child and how and under which article.
3. In case father trying to meet his child but mother not giving permition for meeting with child so can father go and meet his child
OR
Move / File request application in front of Honorable court for meeting with child.
4. If mother calming that female child don't want to meet his father so can father move request in court for counseling under medication center of female child since she is staying with mother from since birth till 18 years under influence of mother and chances of brainwash of child.
Pls advise if require any further details for reply.
Thanks and Regds
Sandeep
siril
03 August 2015 at 12:18
Can any one provide me the address of consultant they have represented before central excise case of rice mill machinery manufactures association of india
The case fact mentioned below
lassification of rice parboiling machinery -reg
Circular No 924/ 14/2010-CX
F.No. 167/42/ 2009-CX.4
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Custom
.....
New Delhi, the 19 May, 2010
To,
All the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise,
All the Chief Commissioner of Customs
All the Director General
All Commissioners,
Sir,
Subject: Classification of rice parboiling machinery -reg
It has been brought to the notice of the Board that classification of Rice parboiling machinery is being disputed in certain jurisdictions. Two tariff headings under consideration for its classification are 8419 or 8437. It has been represented by the Rice Mill Machinery Manufacturers Association that the practice so far followed by the department was not to charge excise duty for many years but suddenly it has been sought to charge duty on these machines by proposing classification under heading 8419. The matter has been examined by the Board.
2. Paddy processing plant consists of sections with functions like parboiling, drying, rice milling and polishing . Parboiling plants and drier plants are used for steaming and drying paddy and also for reducing the moisture content in the paddy. The processed paddy is then sent to subsequent sections where husking, hauling, milling and polishing are undertaken. Briefly, parboiling process involves three stages, namely, pre-steaming, soaking and steaming. In the first stage, clean raw paddy is steamed for 3 to 5 minutes. In the second stage, pre-steamed paddy is soaked in water tanks for about 4-5 hours. In the last stage, the soaked paddy is passed through steaming process for 3-5 minutes. Subsequently, steamed rice are dried in a dryer. The dryer is also supplied alongwith parboiling rice machinery. It has been mentioned by the Association that 100% of parboil plant and equipment are used only in rice mill industry and that the parboiling process is exclusive to paddy. It has also been contended by the Association that parboiling units are integral part of rice mill. Subsequent to the parboiling process, the further process of dehusking and drying is carried out in the same unit. Therefore, parboiling rice machinery is an integral part of rice mill plant. Thus it has been argued by the Association that these machines merit classification under heading 8419 because of following main grounds:
i. Rice parboiling machineries are used only in rice mill plant.
ii. These are integral part of rice processing plant and these cannot function in isolation. Therefore, function of Rice parboiling machinery/ drying unit is complementary to other function of rice processing plant.
3. On the other hand, in support of classifying it under tariff heading 8419, it has been argued that Parboiling and drier plants perform the function of steaming and drying which are independent of milling and these occur before milling process. Therefore it has been viewed that parboiling and drier plant are not essential and integral part of rice mill and therefore it would merit classification under heading 8419. It has also been opened that machinery performing specific functions like steaming or drying are specifically covered by heading 8419. Further, reference has also been made to Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 84 to justify the classification under heading 8419.
4.1 On examination of the issue, the Board observes that the General rules for interpretation of Central Excise Tariff provide that “for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative Sect
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Case life cycle
Dear experts,
pls help to clarify a confusing and desperate situation. I had filled divorce case in 2008 on ground of cruelty and adultery. I had submitted an electronic evidence in which i had my conversation with my wife video taped having her confession to her extra matrimonial relationship. This was exhibited during my trial but during my wife trial, i asked to play that DVD in court which was denied by PO, I asked to play it as my wife denied it to her voice in the DVD. I had then moved an application in family court to take my wife voice sample and send to FSL along with DVD to voice match. While deciding my application, PO dismissed my application and ordered to make this evidence inadmissable on basis of Rayla judgement of Andhra pradesh HC. I had then gone to Jaipur High Court and there also my writ got dismissed based on the same ruling. In the dismissal order in HC jaipur, judge ordered to time bound the case in family court for 2 months from the date the HC order is submitted in family court.
The HC judgment can be accessed here: http://rhccasestatus.raj.nic.in/smsrhcb/rhbcis/judfile.asp?ID=CW%20%20%20&nID=14726&yID=2013&doj=5/26/2015
In the confused state of mind and being pressed on time, i fought the final argument in absence of my prime evidence and finally, I got my divorce petition dismissed.
Now although I can go to High court in appeal, I am being suggested to parallelly go to Supreme court against the High court order as i am still in the window of appeal period of 90 days.
I am confused if its logically possible, because the underlying case is already dismissed in family court. can I still pursue the case in supreme court? pls advice. if yes, and if SC orders in my favor to make the evidence admissible again, can i use that directly in High Court.