SANDEEP Singh
26 August 2015 at 14:40
I have been convicted under 302 for life in trial court
I have also filed appeal in high court.....my query is can i file some new evidences for my defence in high court.....if yes then under which provision
Pls guide me in detail.........
I also want to mention here that my case was registered and trial was conducted under u/s 304B
but they sentenced me in muder......there was no direct or indirect evidence in my case.....judge has sentenced me on three ground:-
1) viscera report showing poison( organo phosphorus) in my wife blood sample
2) sec106 of evidence act
are these reasons are sufficient to frame me under murder......
3) police hasnt found any poison from my house or from scene of crime......
4) postmortem report suggest no symtom of such poison in body also no injury marks
Sandeep
Atis Kumar Bhattacharya
26 August 2015 at 13:50
Whether an officer of state government undertakings who is entitled to avail LTC for self and his family to visit throughout India once in 4 years can also avail journey with the previledge pass of his spouse who is employed in rail during the same block period
Dr. Shekhar
26 August 2015 at 13:01
I wanted to discuss the harassment in one matrimonial case which is though ordered exparte and for exparte evidences on next date. But still the ex parte evidences are not being heard on next date by the judge. Reason they give that they have 100 cases today and so the case is being adjourned continuously to next date.
Kindly help as to what is the best to do in such case.
Rajeev
26 August 2015 at 12:58
if someone has sold more land like 12 beega (in record mutation done) while he has only 10 beega in his title(ror).
dear sir, what action can be taken in this regard.
KETAN J SHAH
26 August 2015 at 12:51
Respected Sir's,
I am a landlord of a property in Mumbai. I have filed a case against my Tenant in small cause court for various illegal additions /alterations carried out in the commercial rented premises. B M C has issued a M R T P notice against the tenant on which tenant has filed suit in city civil court against the corporation in which I have been made a party to the suit by Hon'High courts order. In both the suits tenant has given wrong evidence.While renting out the premises I had given a list of amenities to the tenant to be provided by me. But Tenant did not approvre my amenities and carried out the work himself.When I told him that you have done lot of wrong work he said he will take care of the things in case any objection is raised by corporation. He stopped paying rent. I filed a suit . In the suit W S he says the work carried out is as per the letter given by me. He has not mentioned anything about the work done by him. I got the premises inspected by an architect and the report is ready to be submitted in the court. Now the tenant is saying all the work mentioned in the report is done by landlord.
I request the experts panel to give an opinion as to what happens to this kind of statements Will the court take note of this please advise and give your expert opinion. I had posted the same query few days ago but I have not received any answer so I have posted this query again.
Thanking you in advance
subhendu
26 August 2015 at 12:37
Dear Sir,
I passed B.tech from CMJUNIVERSITY, Meghalya in the year 2012, Governor of the state suddenly lodged FIR against University chancellor/owner in the year 2013 stating that recall all degree, the case going to supreme court & SC ordered to govt that you please chose the option ie either dissolve the univ or anything also stating please think about pas sout student by given chances of hearing & govt took hearing & invalidate all degree by sending individual letter. The university till now ugc list. At current year university challenge govt dissolution order & university own the case. The High court meghalya cancelled the govt dissolution order.
my Question is- "IS MY DEGREE NOW VALID"
2nd Question Is- I passed B.Tech from that university is it valid for govt job?
ARUMUGA PERUMAL PILLAI
26 August 2015 at 12:29
Dear Sir,
we are 3 in my family(mother, me& sister)We have an land in my fathers name, since he was dead we(me & my mother) planned to take 3 equal share, but my sister is not accepting and she is telling that she needs the half of the land and not agreeing for 3 share she is agree for only 2 share, kindly advice if i & my mother go to the Register office for 3 equal share, whether my sisters presence is must or me and my ma can register by giving one share to her.
srinivas
26 August 2015 at 12:28
sir
my father bought arevenue plaot in tumkur karanatak in my mothers name 30 years back .
25 year back a one room kitchen was built on the same land .no approvals was obtained from any authority while constructing the same .
few year back area came under municipal corpotaion and since then taxes were paid by my father .
he is no more and original sale deed is lost and we have only a certified copy . now municipal corpoation is aquiring part of our constructed building for road widening and asking us to submit all the documents to claim compensation
viz
1) original sale deed
2) plan sanction for the building
3) pahani
4) katha of the land
5) tax paid recipts till date
we do not have teh baove except tax receipt. how do we handle the issue .my mother stays in pune and is 80 years old and cannot move.
can she execute a GPA (notarised ) in my sisters name in pune and whether the same can be used by my sister to approach the relevant authorities to sort out the issue.pl advice.
thanks
Advocate M J
26 August 2015 at 12:23
VERY GOOD DAY TO THE HON'BLE LAWYERS. my client has entered into a rental agreement paid a deposit of rs.60,000 she has vacated for the past 3 years, the landlord has not refunded the deposit even after sending a legal notice can i file a case in consumer form if not where pl. advice.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Demise of guaranteer
A person breeks loan from bank & has nothing to pledge except personal guarantee. After his demise he has nothing to clear the loan as he has no assets. The children have not inherited anything but the court insists you have to clear the loan. Is it justifiable & if so how to defend this order. Please help