krishana yadav
01 October 2015 at 12:51
Sir,
I am working in 46oo grade pay post currently. Now i have selected for a 2800 grade pay post in my home town. Sir please advise me may i get pay protection after getting technical resignation or not and tell me in detail.
sujata
01 October 2015 at 11:33
hi am a tv producer at a govt. organisation(can't name it here). it's that we are working on a special series for special able kids. i need help from an expert to know off their legal rights provided to them by our constitution. this is in the beginning phase (research phase) will tell all the details once we meet.....
yours contribution will be appreciated.
thanks
Anonymous
01 October 2015 at 11:27
Sir I'm kishan sharma,mera service ka matter cat me 2006 ko ye kahkar decide kiya tha k aap kabhi regular nahi ho sakte aapko supreme court ki ruling 1988 per rakha gaya tha isiliye aapko regular nahi kiya ja sakta lekin mere sath work kar rahe baki contingency employees ko 2007 & 2010 me regular kar diya gaya jabki mere case me Ye kaha gaya tha k koi bhi kabhi regular nahi hoga ,mene aage appeal bhi file nahi ki thi ye sochkar k supreme court ki ruling hai per department ne uska palan nahi kiya kya ab mebhi case file kar sakta hoo ji please suggest me any best for me,thanks,
K.S.Srinivas
01 October 2015 at 11:26
A.P. Reorganisation Act., 2014.
Provision for employees of Public Sector Undertakings, etc.
Section 82. On and from the appointed day, the employees of State Public Sector Undertakings, corporations and other autonomous bodies shall continue to function in such undertaking, corporation or autonomous bodies for a period of one year and during this period the corporate body concerned shall determine the modalities for distributing the personnel between the two successor States.
1) Appointed day is 2nd June 2014.
2) Before the appointed day, the APTRANSCO is the corporate body consisting of 23 districts of unified Andhra Pradesh.
3) Telangana State TRANSCO was created vide orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.26, dated 29-5-2015 and started functioning from 2-6-2015.
4) The residuary APTRANSCO now consists of 13 districts and the TS TRANSCO consists of 10 districts.
5) The unified APTRANSCO issued orders to some of its employees to work in Telangana State TRANSCO on “Order to serve” basis till the employees bifurcation is completed through option process.
In the light of the above and as per section 82 of the Act,
1. Which is the Corporate Body concerned that would determine the modalities for distributing the personnel between the two successor states?
(a) Is it unified APTRANSCO (consisting of 23 districts, which is not there, and the residuary APTRANSCO consists of 13 districts only)
OR
(b) The residuary APTRANSCO (consisting of now 13 districts)
OR
(c) The TSTRAMSCO (consisting of 10 districts) which is created on 29-5-2015 and functioning w.e.f. 2-6-2015.
OR
(d) Central Government.
Reena Jaggi
01 October 2015 at 11:21
Respected Sir,
If someone has given a loan to his friend in cash and only have some signed blank cheque with him as proof is there any way to recover..no bond was signed..nothing was done..also pls.let me know any transaction over Rs.20,000 has to be with cheque only
thanks
bhavesh kumar
01 October 2015 at 10:59
Sir, 498-A was register on 2012 in Thane maharashtra. on the evidence of 90000 taken by me. From father in law through RTG on my account. In 2013 my father in law has filed Civil. Recovery suit. In NASHIK on same 90000 and mentioned amount taken as loan. Matter is pending in the lower court and charge is yet to be framed. Should I go for quashing?
K.SudhakarChoudary
01 October 2015 at 10:35
Sir,
I purchased a property with a choultry and a vacant land in and around the building. The owner`s grand father has purchased the said land in the year 1888 vide Doc No:521 and constructed a building using as free choultry. i purchased the said property from the legal heirs in the year 2003 vide Doc No1129 and 1304 of 2006.There was a tenant in the said building and on compromise i got vacated him in Lokadalath. I demolished the the said very old building( A notice has also been issued by Municipal authority to demolish the said building as it was in a collapsing stage)
After demolition Devastham suddenly came in to picture claiming that the said property belongs to them.By a Sumoto enquiry by revenue Dept. made an entry noting Devasthanams name in the year1883. Till this case the said Devasthanam did not make any claim or file any suite for recovery of the property.Tried to take possession but CrPC Sec145 was imposed by the Mandal Executive Magistrate and Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupati on 13-8-2006 stating that Both the parties should not enter in to the said vacant site.
Plz advise on this matter. Now the case has come for trail.
Now i am prepared to give an undertaking to the court that i shall handover the property once declares title to the petitioner till than i may be permitted to use / enjoy the property.
Any judgments in such case.
Dr. Shekhar
01 October 2015 at 10:19
I have filed CD as Exhibited evidence along with 65B certificate. Still if the judge is of the view that this evidence should be put as MARK and not as EXH. can he reject the affidavit to be accepted or at the most he can himself consider it as MARK at the argument stage?
sonu singh
01 October 2015 at 10:18
Sir I was posted as assistant teacher at 4200 grade on 31/07/2013 , while I applied for assistant teacher in junior school at 4600 grade. I got lien for one year from 30/09/2015 and I joined at 01/10/2015 to new post. I want to know that how pay will be decided and what are the rules for service book. I also want to know what will happen if I revert back to my original post (4200 grade).
Thanks for assistance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Consumer forum jurisdiction for colaba, mumbai
Sir,
Please inform me the Consumer Forum Jurisdiction for Colaba, Mumbai and the address, Phone No. of the Forum.
With regards,
(Motilal Jhalani)