BINDU MADHAVI
08 February 2016 at 11:33
Hi sir/madam
When do we get the patent agent 2016 notification
Rajeswariii
08 February 2016 at 11:20
My friend, who joined with State Bank of India as Probationary officer in Mar 2011 was terminated in Jun 2013 even after extending his probation in Apr 2013.The reason cited is he has not disclosed a pending case (Marriage related)against him. The case is settled in Jan 2013 in Lok Adalat.He has got a notice by SBI in Dec 2012 reg the case and Case is settled in Lok adalat as compromise in Jan 2013. The details are submitted by him to Bank.Later, after extending probation in Apr 2013, he is terminated in Jun 2013.
Probation is for a period of 2 years. After completion of 2 yrs probation period, Bank extended the probation citing a ground that the candidate has to improve the subject but not on the ground of the case. Later after extension of probation, within 1 month, service is terminated. The case is a false case Under Sec 417,420 Under sec 34 and also under sec 3,4 of Dowry prohibition act(resolved in Jan 2013 in Lok adalat)
The case came to the notice of SBI while making enquiry about antecedents. The judgement is given by lok adalat is a compromise award is given between two parties and the case is closed. The termination notice contained details of the sections of the case. But, it didn't mention about the case in extension letter given in Apr 2013."
The case came to the notice of SBI while making enquiry about antecedents.
The Bank gave a show cause notice regarding the pending case on 10.12.2012 giving a deadline of 31.12.2012 to answer. My friend replied on 31.12.2012 to give one month time to submit proofs defending his version. Accordingly, he got the case resolved in Lok adalat on 29.01.2013 and submitted the proof and explanation on 07.02.2013. Later, on 02.04.2013, he was given an extention of probation letter indicating that his performance need to improve. No information relating to show cause and his explanations. Later after one month, on 03.05.2013, he was issued a termination order with one month notice mentioning the show cause letter. No mention is given about the probation extention letter.
I came to know that Hon’ble Chandigarh High Court (Punjab & Haryana) Justice Sri Kuldeep Singh gave a judgement around 23.12.2015 in the case of Amandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab that non disclosure of pending case should not lead to termination. Can you please send me the copy of it??
Please help in our case.
Hardik
08 February 2016 at 09:31
Sir, I married a woman but we have many language and cultural problems. Due to this, a lot of misunderstanding is happening, she recently filed a case of maintenance and domestic violence against me & my mother. We have a baby boy as well of 2 years to whom I have never seen since she is living away from last 2 years. They are very stubborn and demanding 55 lakh for maintenance and just for your information, I do not even hv that much property. She do not even answer call or reply my message. Please support me how can I get divorce from her? I am scared she might commit suicide if she comes back, because she tried to commit suicide two times. And we just stayed together for 2 months.
iftekhar Malik
08 February 2016 at 01:35
Respected Sir,
I filled a case against my petitioner husband u/s 498A/307/323/406 but in charge sheet police deleted the name of an accused person due to under age i.e 15 years. the fact of the case is she badly assaulted the petitioner and hitting by iron sticks to petitioner head and body and 65% allegation are made on her.
when I reported to IO of the case then he just told my she is under age of 14.
please help me sir in this matter.
can I made a complaint to ACJM regarding this matter and under which section .
please help
vipul
08 February 2016 at 00:19
I have joined a sole proprietorship. I have to give salary bifurcation . One of our employee is getting 35000/- per month and i gave following bifurcation.
Basic 50% = 17500
DA 10% = 3500
HRA 40% of basic + DA = 8400
Transport Allowance = 1600
Children Education Allowance = 200
Special Allowance = 3800
Actually I had bifurcate 35000/- as on random basis.
My question is whether this %age is correct or i have to follow some fixed %age if any recommended by Act....??
Ashok kumar Sharma
08 February 2016 at 00:01
A AND B BOTH ARE FRIEND,AND RUNNING THEIR BUSINESS SEPERATELY. B BORROWED MONEY FROM A THROUGH RTGS IN HIS ACCOUNT FOR EXPENSION OF BUSINESS.NO ANY TYPE OF AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN BOTH AND AMOUNT GIVEN FOR A VERY SHORT PERIOD WITHOUT INTEREST.BUT IT WAS MUTUALLY DECIDED THAT BORROWED AMOUNT WILL NOT BE REPAY IN INSTALMENT.40% OF THE LOAN AMOUNT RETURNED BY B BY HIS OWN CHEQUE AND FOR REST 60% B GAVE CHEQUE OF HIS ELDER BROTHER WHICH WAS NOT IN PICTURE.ALL CHEQUES FOR 60% AMOUNT GET BOUNCED. B REFUSED TO PAY MONEY TO A.HOW A RECOVER HIS MONEY.
Tilak Kumar K N
07 February 2016 at 23:10
Hi,
We are married together for 1.2years. Am not happy with her from day 1. She has no problems from me but I don't like her behaviour or her mood swings or anything about her. I have tried to compromise but am not able to live with the fact that i am married to her. She isn't willing to get a divorce. But I am insisting. She has completed her BE in CS and can get very good job than mine. What are my chances of getting a divorce and what all am going to lose in wealth. Am from Bangalore, Karnataka
Ashok kumar
07 February 2016 at 20:49
I have joined in railway on open completion exam after technical resignation. Which benefit I am entitled as per rule
Balaji Bakthavathsal
07 February 2016 at 18:02
In a Civil Suit, before commencing the trial in the lower court, issued are framed by whom ? By the judge of the concerned court, by the plaintiff lawyer or by the respondent lawyer ?
In the lower court, in a civil suit, the respondent filed an I.A. with the prayer to dismiss the plaint as res-judicata but the lower court passed an order saying that the suit is not res-judicata though the property is one and the same, the plaintiffs are different and the prayer sought in the plaint is different. The respondent took up the matter to the High Court and filed a CRP and the High Court too dismissed the CRP and upheld the suit filed in the lower court. Under these circumstances, the issued were framed in the lower court and one of the point in it is whether the suit is barred by the principal of res-judicata. It is confusing when the very same lower court has dismissed the IA saying that it is not res-judicata and the High Court too upheld the lower court’s decision, how come again the point is raised ? Can you please the learned lawyers elucidate ?
Thanks & Regards
Balaji
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding patent agent
Hi sir/madam
When do we get the patent agent 2016 notification