LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

sameer   17 February 2016 at 21:45

Discrimination in compensation among employees

Sir, I am an employee of one MNC in india and been working in this company from last 14 years. Now this company has been merged with other MNC in India. This reform was done on 1st Oct15. Across globe, this is termed as a Joint Venture of 34%(our Co) & 66% (new Co, and in India, this new company has bought our company.
Now, this company has created a new vertical and currently placed all of us (employee of old Co) under that newly formed vertical.
I have been working on a supervisory role in my company and covering Field job & Market and have few reportees.
My reportees and all of their collogues across PAN India, who are members of Trade union BKMC, were asked to resigned and leave the Co with a peanut amount as a compensation. Since they are in to register trade union they opt a legal way and they all have filed a case in labour court in their respective towns across India. As a result management, who had offered them a peanut amount to leave the job, came with an offer of VRS, which is 4 times more compensation then what they had offered them before.
Now since it is a court matter, and prolong battle, management has started to approach us and started conveying us to resign and take a peanut as a compensation. This is a case of Discrimination among the employee of the same Company. Since we are as a supervisory role employees, & are not unionized under any trade union, management is now trying to threat us and asking us to leave with what ever they offer us otherwise we will lose this offer also. We at a similar designation role, across India are requesting management to offer us same VRS, that they had offered to our reportees. They are not ready for this. Also they refuse to provide us a copy of an agreement that was done between both the company during merger.
Please guide me, what can be done in this case? Jobs are not available for us in this new venture. If no job, but can we, as a management employees, go legally to increase our compensation on the ground of Discrimination ?
What steps we can take and we should take to get a Job or good amount of compensation. Management is not giving any thing in writing. They threat us to terminate without any compensation if do not agree to them.
Plz tell me what can we do in this whole case?

abhishek   17 February 2016 at 21:29

About info

sir, my client have not yet given sport certificate from Maharashtra armature athalatic association .and association is not responding for any RTI letter. so whre i m stand this case. is it in high court or dharmaday sanstha

Anonymous   17 February 2016 at 21:00

transfer name

If this flats can be transferred in future (after complition of 10 yrs of allotment), what are the process for said transfer of ownership?

prasanna kumar   17 February 2016 at 20:55

Arraying company in 138 case

in a complaint u/s138 of NI act the name of the company and the name of the signatory of the cheque is mentioned in the cause tile in the following manner:-

Name of the signatory
designation
representing
Company name
address of Company.
Separate cause title for each one of them is not mentioned. whether it can be construed as the company is made party in the complaint. Pls opine and give citations if any.



sunil   17 February 2016 at 19:42

regarding discharge certificate

Sir I was Asi in cisf I resigned from there on 04.02.2016 through proper chanel and complete all formalities . and join in supreme court as an jca. On 10.2.2016 .Then I mail to my Cisf unit to review my resignation and the clerck stop my discharge certificate because of my application . but sir I already cleared all the formalities so deserve my certificate . please help

Member (Account Deleted)   17 February 2016 at 19:39

Prevention of corruption act

What is maximum punishment under section 13 of pc act. I heard abt that pc act undewent some amendement

ATUL ACHYUT GOKHALE   17 February 2016 at 18:54

Validity of compromise decree of partition in highcourt

We are unknown about compromise decree of partition in Mumbai Highcourt in the year 1964. In some part execution of decree is not happened. Can we do partition of land according to decree after 50 years.

gopinathan   17 February 2016 at 18:14

Inherent power of hc

Dr crl.law Experts

A govt servant with support of various documents collected through RTI, is willing and ready to prove his innocence. whether HC in its inherent power can quash FIR charaged u/s 7 and 13 of PC Act before charge sheet not filed. Some of the documentary facts below:

a) Vigilance arrested an officer based on Civil Contractor (A)complaint
b)But Work order and bill was prepared in the name of (B) (RTI doc)
c)Security deposit receipt originally raised in the name of (B) and erased the name to (B)(copy of chalan xerox)
d)Measurement Book was prepared in the name of (B) and subsequently scored out and written as (A) (M.Book should not be scored out. Its a legal document)
e)A&B were forged and prepared number of commercial tax certificates Form.S and got about 20 lakhs VAT evaded (RTI docs)
f)the officer being taken legal action against A&B reg lack of quality control works is a ongoing matter.
g)25 days before the complaint of A legal notice was sent by officer to A&B
h)officer stayed through HC for not to payment 3 work bills of A&B Rs.55 lakhs until further orders
i)Moreover HC sent notice to department higher officers based on the officer charged on the concerned Asst Engineer who colluded with A&B in all aspects

Fact and conspiracy is, contractor B impersonated A with the collusion of Asst Engineer who is the authority to prepare tender documents.

Kindly advice whether quashing of FIR is possible under this circumstance



e)

rds   17 February 2016 at 17:40

Whether an authorised signatory of a company would be liable

Whether an authorised signatory of a Public Ltd company would be liable for prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Once he issue the cheque and cheque is dishonour now he is trying to remove his name

Please give me some judgements showing that "whether an authorised signatory of a Public Ltd company would be liable"

Thank You

Anonymous   17 February 2016 at 17:00

Interim maintenance

Dear All Lawyers,

My wife has charged me for domestic violence and she left me immediately after 2 months of our marriage and we have a baby boy. Now my salary is 18000/- per month. I have seen my wife working in one matrimonial company before her delivery and she is MA in English Literature. But I have no proof of her employment. But I know the place where she worked. Also I don't know if she is currently working or not. Interim maintenance will be finalised on 1st March, I need your guidance. Please tell me how much I would have to pay from my salary?