Diana
27 February 2016 at 17:16
I am the seller n applied for NOC from the society after the registration with the buyer n had submitted the bank format for NOC to the society n had sent an application for NOC 2weeks in advance. After all verbal approvals the Chairman n the Secy. say that an FIR has been filed against them by a member of the society on grounds of abtaining deemed conveyance basis fake documents (claims to be an overnight development) . They say they cannot issue an NOC basis this. However, to my knowledge a case has been registered against the 2 in 2013 n they r fighting it out since then claiming the documents are authentic. The last flat to my knowlede was sold last month and they are the ones to issue NOC. My question is can they deny NOC to me in such a scenario?
Md Omar farooq
27 February 2016 at 16:44
One person took vehicle loan from bank and my friend stood Surity for that person who took loan was employee but he left job now my friend had died do his wife has to pay the loan amount
Swapnil
27 February 2016 at 16:21
Sir
If email received from othetside then how prove an email as evidence
Swapnil
27 February 2016 at 16:12
Whether recording in court room is offense or not.
And its considered as evidence if require ?
Mahesh M
27 February 2016 at 15:43
Respected experts,
we are the NBFC and we were accepting deposit and give loans to our clients.
The said NBFC went into the liquidations and few years back it was revived.
meanwhile official liquidator during the liquidation period had filed the recovery suit against the loanees, and got the order in his favour.
one among the loanee challenged before the High court telling that the loan taken by him is barred my limitation and he is not liable to pay the decreed amount against him. Court informed him to deposit the some amount if court wants to admit the said case accordingly it was paid, and accordingly he won the case Now the loanee is asking for the refund of his amount which was deposited before Official Liquidator.
My Question to experts:
As i said earlier, Now company got revived and amount deposited by the above said loanee is been withdrawn and now can we setoff the amount which is outstanding to the above loanee?
Rajeswariii
27 February 2016 at 15:10
Sir, I want to know whether a High Court of one state should give judgement in line with the judgement given by a High Court of another state on a similar type of case??
shivshyam mishra
27 February 2016 at 14:19
hello sir/madam,
i owe ecosport car and after its registration i was given the number UP 79 K 2036 as written in original RC paper issued by RTO and from then i used the same number plate for more than a year and half. but recent when i verified i was shocked to know that my car number is UP79K2035. for the whole year i have been using wrong number plate. when asked RTO about the mistake they replied that its just a print mistake and made me liable for not verifying the number clearly. i wonder how this can be my mistake when like everyone i too relied on the original RC number issued by RTO and duly signed by the authorities. kindly provide me neccessary information in this regard and clearly suggest on whose shoulder the responsibility falls??
thankyou
KETAN J SHAH
27 February 2016 at 13:34
Respected Sirs,
I am the Landlord of a building in Mumbai. My tenant has carried out illegal additions/alterations in the premises. At the time of shifting him from one premises to other I had given him some specifications that some work of NON Damaging nature would be done by me.However he did not like the idea and hence he carried out work totally against my specifications without my NOC or permission from BMC In 2014 I got permission from Court to carry out inspection of the suit premises. After this there was noted visible drastic illegal work reported.Now the Tenant is saying that this work is done by me where in the Ws he has pleaded that the specification of work which I had given him is done by me. Now my question is what can the court take in view my specification or commissioners report of inspection.Commissioner was appointed on the order from the court.
Please advice
Thanking you in advance
KETAN J SHAH
27 February 2016 at 13:31
Respected Sirs,
I am the Landlord of a building in Mumbai. My tenant has carried out illegal additions/alterations in the premises. At the time of shifting him from one premises to other I had given him some specifications that some work of NON Damaging nature would be done by me.However he did not like the idea and hence he carried out work totally against my specifications without my NOC or permission from BMC In 2014 I got permission from Court to carry out inspection of the suit premises. After this there was noted visible drastic illegal work reported.Now the Tenant is saying that this work is done by me where in the Ws he has pleaded that the specification of work which I had given him is done by me. Now my question is what can the court take in view my specification or commissioners report of inspection.Commissioner was appointed on the order from the court.
Please advice
Thanking you in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cam i file a petition on a act issued by state
Sir, can i file w.p in High court against act made by Telangana government to regularize the services of contract employees as they have appointed without rule of reservation, proper notification and backdoor appointments and violated Article 14 & 16 of constitution of india