As Subramanyam Swami is not qualifed lawyer, how he can be said to be eligible as per Advocates Act, 1961 for fighting the case in court for others (Like Aasaram Bapu)?
An alleged builder 'B' & an engineer 'E' made a shop complex of 3 shops and also get the Map Plan sanctioned from Municipal Corporation of the city. But actually they made 6 shops instead of 3 shops as sanctioned .
Then by making a forged Map of that Building having 6 shops they sold a shop no 2 , to my father in year 2005 in cash 2 lacs rupees . The agreement is done by registered special power of attorney . They also submitted that forged Map to registrar office and got special power of attorney registered with the name of my Father. We came to about all these facts when we were trying to sell that shop consistently since last year & collected original Sanctioned Map from Municipal Corporation .
Now the ccondition is that no one is ready to buy shop due to bullying nature of 'B' & 'E' and also 'B' harassing us by giving offer of only 2 lacs rupees now to return him shop. Also ' B' has changed the lock of shop also ...please advice what number of steps we can against these alleged Leach of society engulfing huge amount from innocent people on the name of """Faith "".
What criminal complaints against engineer and builder, any recovery suit, what about forged map they submitted to register office and got registry done, what is the value if registered special power of attorney .Any serious actions can be taken against engineer so that his degree and registration as an engineer will be destroyed ( whom to we complaint/approach ).
GR Gupta
15 April 2016 at 11:55
Dear Sir,
There is a Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983. In the year 2012, the Haryana Govt. published another act called The Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 which came into force in 2012.
Please intimate whether the Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983 has been lapsed due to implementation of this
Society Act, 2012 and at present HAO Act, 1983 is not valid.
Thanks,
sir there is a whole lot of confusion after the supreme court verdict b/w registered gpa,registered irrevocable gpa,notarised gpa,notarised irrevocable gpa. few sub registrar are executing the sale deed even on notarised gpa {on 100 rs stamp paper}even today after supreme court verdict.are these sale deed illegal & null & void? 2.why cant all opt for notarized gpa & save stamp duty? 3.what is the use of notrizing a gpa & registering a gpa??????? 4.can even on this current dt a notarized gpa be given to enter into a registered sale agreement or a registered mortgage agreement & collect money on land owners behalf?kindly help us out in the whole mess of gpa confusion........
Ravneet kaur
15 April 2016 at 09:06
You want judgement of mithu v state of punjab 1983 is easily available on Indian
kanoon.
Satyamev
15 April 2016 at 09:01
Dear Experts
I have final argument in the Family Court w.r.t to the 125 CRPC Petition filed by my wife.Matter pertains to a Family Court in Uttarakhand and the argument is next week for which I am doing preps.
Facts :
1. Wife lived together for only 15 days which is a accepted fact.
2. Wife was working before the marriage in an IT company and has done B-Tech which is accepted fact but it was not disclosed in her petition , submission only came from her side at the time of intensive cross questioning that was recorded as her statement which was not a part of her original petition as in that she claimed that she is a house wife and does not know anything apart from house work and did not mention about her qualification.
3.Wife gave admission that she is capable to work and is able bodied but due to gap of 2 years she is not able to find a job and this submission came at the time of cross questioning recorded as her statement which was not a submission in her petition.
4. Wife left a letter before leaving her matrimonial home in which she is praising her husband and in laws and claims she is very happy with him and letter was written before going to mayika in the absence of husband, letter is undated however no submission was given w.r.t her in her petition about this letter but at the time of cross questioning w.r.t the same petition she stated that she was made to forcefully write this letter at time of Honeymoon in Thailand that was recorded as her statement but she has already given an affidavit in Dowry Matter in the High Court of Uttarakhand stating that the same very letter was made to write forcefully in her matrimonial home after returning from honeymoon which is a gross contradiction.
No sane person can believe that I could have committed a crime after reading that letter.
Question :
1.She has given no evidence to prove her allegations w.r.t the 125 petition and closed her evidence without any evidence.
Any relevant rulings/citations of SC that clearly say that no relief can be given without any evidence ? She has closed her evidence saying , no evidence to be submitted.
2. She has lied at several places for which there is clear cut evidence in the form of her different versions and admissions given at several places that show that she is lying.
Any ruling/citations of SC that clearly say that no relief can be given if the petitioner has lied or hidden facts in her maintenance petition ?
3. Wife was working before marriage and is capable to earn which is her own admission in her statements , but she says she is not able to find a job .
Any rulings of SC that say a previously employed wife is not entitled to maintenance ? there are several rulings of different HC's but I dont think the family court judge will consider it as he considers only his state High Court rulings/citations and of Supreme Court.
Moreover he is extremely pro woman and it was hell of a task for not letting him give interim maintenance to my wife previously but now it's final argument.
Satyamev
15 April 2016 at 08:35
My wife of 15 days filed a complaint against me that I hacked her Social Networking Account and published obscene content about her. She has also filed 7 more cases against me that I am defending on merits.
FIR was lodged against me U/s 66 C and 66 D of IT Act and after one year of investigation Police submitted Final Report. Police submitted Final Report in the Court saying that no evidence was found and the same case was also investigated by Cyber Cell. In dowry and other cases same Police blindly filed chargesheet without any evidence but in this I believe they were helpless as it required pure technical evidence and the matter was routed to different agency which did not find any evidence.
I did my own study and I am aware protest petition can be filed and re-investigation can happen or it can be converted into complaint case but these are the things that i am not clear about which i am asking respectable experts here.
Question :
1. How should I stop her attempt to succeed in Re-Investigation , in short does accused has a right to defend her protest petition and challenge it ?
2. How should I stop her from converting her FIR into complaint case and making me face the trial. By no means she can prove my crime in the trial but just to harress me she can make me face the trial.
M.Kapoor
15 April 2016 at 08:02
Sir/Madam,
My other income is 4 Lakh in a year,so i go for term deposit of 1 Lakh.Can i summit 15 G form to bank for not deduct the TDS.
Thanking You.
M.Kapoor
15 April 2016 at 07:21
Sir/Madam,
My other income is 4 Lakh in a year,so i go for term deposit of 1 Lakh.Can i summit 15 G form to bank for not deduct the TDS.
Thanking You.
Leave license agreement
would like to know whether leave license agreement can be made for renting out housecum shop in karanataka for aperiod of 11 or 22 months or 33 months .is this agreement can be registered as well in karnataka.pl do let us know stampduty and regn charges as well considering rent of Rs 3000 /month and depost of Rs 30000