Himanshu
06 July 2017 at 18:05
Dear Sir,
We are the tenants from past 40 years of a building situated in Mulund West in Pagdi system. The original owner had made deal with one builder to sell in 2007 which is not completed till now due to the dispute between owner brothers. 33% of the part has been taken over by builder from one of the brother and seems to have transferred/registered in his name. Due to all this building has not been repaired for long and is now dilapidated. Out of total 33 tenants 60% have shifted to other rented place and 40% still stays there.
Two days back front side slab fell down and one lady unfortunately passed away. Today BMC has issued a notice under section 354, 488, 491 and section 475-A of MMC act 1888 under section 58 of the said act. They have declared this building under C-1 category and asked all the tenants to vacate the place and they will pull down the structure. Notice has been served to Landlord / Builder and all tenants.
There is no action taken by Landlord or Builder till now and people are lower middle class and totally scared that what will happen as in Mumbai it is extremely difficult to move out to other place.
Need your guidance on what is to be done in this situation by tenants to protect their right of the house they are currently occupying (both people who are staying physically and who are not).
jyotirmaya behera
06 July 2017 at 17:26
i want to now implementation of GST and its problem in present time.
Sir / Madam
I am you post paid consumer since long time. You provided the service for the month of june 1 to june 30 and the rate of TAX was 15 % in that period. Today I get my postpaid bill for the month of june where you imposed 18% tax which is illegal for the following reason:-
1- You provided the service for the period of june 1 to june 30.
2- In june 1 to june 30 the rate of the service tax was 15%.
3- You may generate the bill in month of july but you cannot impose the tax (GST) retrospectively.
4- The GST come into force from 1st july onward and nowhere it is mention that the enforcement of GST is retrospectively.
now what will be the answer 15 % or 18 explain with reason?
priya nair
06 July 2017 at 17:06
respected sir,
i bought a new car on march 2017 , it has run for 2100 kilometer.... while travelling in high way my car tyre punctured and torn..with damage to alloy wheel... is the manufacturer of tyre can be held responsible as the car has not run even 3000 km... thank you...
Anonymous
06 July 2017 at 16:01
Hello
My problem is that my brother's In law wife charged a fake allegation on me in caw cell that her husband and I have wrong relationship... She gives me warning that she wants to destroy my life and my family too...I dint do any wrong thing with her..I went to caw cell yesterday they also find me innocent and they said no need to come on next date ...all issues are between husband and wife but she unnecessary put me in her case...I don't knw what to do...I HV two kids and almost dey suffer jus CO of her
Plz advice me
Afzal
06 July 2017 at 14:21
Good Afternoon!
Before a month our company has shutdown our process and out sourced it due to the cost efficiency reasons and we were forced to relive from the organisation immediately but they haven't provide us with the Two month salary as a compensation.
When I enquired regarding this to our organisation, I didn't get any proper response from them and later they have provided me only 15 days salary.
In this case, I would like to know whether the policy of providing the employee with 2 months salary is in the employee act or not! and If it is in the act how should I proceed further?
uma
06 July 2017 at 14:17
sir my husband had taken 100000 from anyone by giving him blank check . Any how we r not able to pay on time so he submit this check on bank and file the case ..now on 4 July judgement came to pay 247000 to him or either go to jail for 1 year.................sir usne check ko income tax me nhi dikhaya..........check usne khud bhara hai we have given him blank check.................is there any sollution for this in upper court.......kya upper court payment bda sakta hai...................upper court me is case ka result kitne din tak extend kiya ja sakta hai.........................
Ayan
06 July 2017 at 13:43
Commercial Tenant and Landlord has a rent agreement on 2005.
After expiry of tenancy in 2006 , dispute occur and no rent paid
by tenant till date.
Tenant file a case in 2009 , Title suit claiming that
1)Court should declare him a bonafied tenant
2)Court should raised a permanent injunction against eviction.
After 2013 , nor tenant or Landlord appear the case .Still case is pending.
I am relative of landlord .Land lord is of 80 and goes several surgery and
old age disease.
Land lord is financially weak also.He appeal to district legal authority ,DLA
has approve his application.
My question is
1)Can we counter claim of eviction in the existing case ?
( Title suit for bonafied tenant)
2)In the above case , as tenant is not appearing 5 years ,
will it be a possible that , we will be plaintiff and tenant will defendant.
We will be able to ask next case date ?
3)We need to file a fresh eviction suit or the existing case can be used for eviction ?
4)The agreement was for 1 commercial shop.Tenant has forcefully occupied
another room and using as store room.Preventing tenant to enter the room.
What will be the best step to get back that room ? Another case , Criminal case
Please advice.
Sankaran
06 July 2017 at 13:08
Hi,
I have a 1 acre agricultural plot in a village in Maharashtra since 2000 v Though the sale deed has been registered , mutation has not been done
My name is not appearing in 7/12 records maintained by revenue authorities in the village though proper sale deed registrations are available
My land along with others in the area , is likely to be taken over by Govt for a "Road project " and a compensation is being expected
Will I have any problem in getting the compensation just because 7/12 does not show my name Proper Sale Deeds registered which confirm my name as "owner"
Request your Expert Opinion
Regards
Anonymous
06 July 2017 at 12:49
dear sir
my inlaws are in uk and they have thrown me out from there house with my son after my husband's death.
i have filled a case.
judge have passed a notice that "notice to respondent no. 1 i.e my father in law be issued fo r 17-07-2017 on filling of Embassy fee " what does it mean
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Need guidance
The mother in law of my sister and her husband has forced my sister to leave her room forcibly & had thrown all the appliance out of the house. Now they are demanding for money.