Lalita
14 August 2017 at 14:03
Sir I have been working with Rajasthan state roadways transport corporation since 4 yrs.now I got selected for Rajasthan state service through proper channel n NOC granted bt now how can I protect my payment the way how to do it ...should I give resignation or relive if I should relieve then pls provide me circular or. Rule by which benefits can be taken
Anonymous
14 August 2017 at 13:56
I live in: Mumbai, Maharashtra.
Hi my query is about understanding regarding the FL3 licence as I am having difficulty applying for it I'm basically trying to get the alcohol licence and wanted to know about the safety precautions regarding my premises. I wanted to read about the school premises being close... what is the minimum distance on maximum distance that the restaurant need to have in order to be completely clean in the eyes of law.. I have been trying to find Law/section of Maharashtra FL3 online which explains this, but was unable to find it on the Internet ... can anyone please share the information as to what section should I look up which will give me a good enough idea about this.
How far should the gate of the school be from the bar/ restaurant's gate?
And where is this law explained in the Indian law section?
AK Misra
14 August 2017 at 13:15
Please let me know when cause of action arises and during what period(From & To) a complaint u/s 138 can be filed
in below cited case.
1.Notice Issued on 14.07.17
2.As per India Post Tracking System "Item Delivery Attempt Unclaimed" on 04.08.17
3. Envelop received by the addressee on 05.08.17
4. The payee intending to file case on 18.07.17 .Whether it will be premature?
5. What is the position/meaning of "Unclaimed" ?
6. whether Payee need to wait for 15 days before lodging Complaint?
Look forward for specific answers? Thanks in advance?
Dev
14 August 2017 at 13:10
Respected sir,
I was worked with the company almost 4.5 (i.e may-11 to jan-16) years. I want to know weather I am eligible to get Gratuity benefits from company or not.
Thanks and regards.
arunkumar
14 August 2017 at 13:04
A case filed before cooperative registrar under 101 mcs act after completing the prcedure mentioned as per bylaws. the case filed in november 2016 and application dismissed by the registrar on the basis of false allegation and declarations made by defaulter member.The d-member submitted his say on 3 march 2017 saying that i have already paid the dues till march 2017 and bank receipts will be submitted. The actual payment was made on 27 June 2017.(The bank entry of passbook).The application is filed in november 2016 and registrar saying that entry of 27th june 2017 is not made in your account statement submitted in nov 2016.
The agm was held on 13.8.13 and also on 27.9.15 when the resolution was passed for recovery under 101 mcs act. The say of the d-member says no such meetings were held though he was also present and shown his interest to become chairman of the society .All this was recorded in the minutes of the meetings and the true copy was submitted with the registrar along with 101 application. But still registrar is saying that no such meetings were held and the resolution passed without referring the attached documents and hence society's application is rejected. now the situation is that as my term as secretary is over on 31.3.2017 and the administrator is appointed on 1st of april 2017.If i want challenge this order of registrar dated 8 the august 2017 as a society member then what is the procedure and where to file the complaint for false declaration given on oath to get the favour of the registrar. by the d-member
ravi
14 August 2017 at 13:02
We had subscribed to a job portal for 2 years on part down payment and part payment in installments. We were not happy with the service after completion of 1 year, and gave them notice that we would like to terminate the agreement. We have paid for the period for which we have used the service. Now the portal is asking us to make the balance payment, even though we have stopped using the portal services saying that the Agreement does not envisage a mid-term exit. We have responded that we have given them notice that we are terminating the Agreement, and that we have paid for the period for which we have used the service. Now they are threatening to take legal action even though we have told them that as a customer, we have an implicit right to terminate an agreement at any time if we are not satisfied with the service, provided we have paid for the service up to the time when we used the service.
himanshu prajapati
14 August 2017 at 11:49
dear sir, I am purchasing a land in kanpur. This land belongs to a Harijan( first owner). The land had been allotted to him(first owner) from Sanrakshit Bhumi. He(first owner) is saying that he will sell me after section 143 of UP land Act (to convert Agriculture land to Abadi land) done in land. My question is; Can he sell land and I will be the legal owner of the land, after 143 being done. Or in future Nagar Nigam & Kanpur Development Authority can take the land back from me citing reason land is being given to harijan(first owner) for use only not for sell.
jatinkumar
14 August 2017 at 11:33
Hello experts and good morning to all !
Sir, does property sold by poah holder in 2007 legal? can I buy that property , sale permission was granted by the collector with condition to deposit 50% amt in holders account and the same was done and sale deed was signed by poah as vendor.
Anonymous
14 August 2017 at 03:17
My organisation has filled up 15 vacancies in unreserved category on own merit by 15 reserved category candidates. Also they had declared Promotional vacancies for SC/ST candidates around 40% excluding backlog. It is also be noted that there is no reserved qouta for OBC candidates in promotion. So remaining 60% seats are for both General/OBC candidates to compete. My question is that here the organisation contempt the supreme court's order dated 29 Sep 2016 with reference to SLP 30621/011 or not by giving promotion on own merit to 15 candidates? and also violating the guidelines of DOPT for the reservation upto 22.5% for reserved category? the judgement of Hon'ble supreme court was like this [{( In order to preclude any interim order in the contempt case, as desired by the hon'ble supreme court, The learned Solicitor General has undertaken that till such time the main matter alongwith the contempt petition is decided, no further promotion of reserved category persons to unreserved posts will be made based on the DOP&T OM Dated 10.08.2010 and Railway Board Circular dtd 14.09.2010 )}]
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Index 2 correction
Is it required to go for rectification deed for changes in index 2 if original deed is correct or simple application to registrar office can make the changes in there record of index 2