Thrishul
20 November 2017 at 20:08
My neighbor removed survey stones.he himself had signed on the survey report before.i informed to mro still no acyion taken.what is the punishment for removal of survey stones . place of incidence Hemavati village,Amarapur mandal,Anantpur,AP.
My neighbor has already constructed a hotel in that property.
Ramkrishna
20 November 2017 at 19:40
Sir,
While laying down storm water drainage the GHMC has connected sewage lines into it, it's giving foul smell and now we are having mosquitoes menance, few people in our street are already affected with dengue fever, and other mosquitoes related disease's. We have been running around the concerned authorities but nothing has been done.
Harry
20 November 2017 at 18:13
There was a road accident case in which the court gave orders to attach property of accused and compensate victim's family. However victim's family got property of some other person attached, the name of the person whose property was attached and his fathers name were similar that of accused and his father. Now they have received summons that their property is attached in road accident case and will be auctioned. Do they need to join as a party to the case and appeal for staying auction or there is any other procedure through which they can ensure the court that they are not the ones who were involved in that accident case?
SDB
20 November 2017 at 16:47
Dear experts
We sued our builder for want of occupation certificate. The consumer Court favoured us and ordered the builders to provide us the OC. There was no appeal from their side. Nor did they comply. We filed execution order and at the date of hearing only the counsel appeared before the judge. The judge issued bailable warrant against each of builders partners and next hearing date was October 2017. All the parties appeared and the judge again gave them 14.11.17 as new date for compliance
On 14.11.2017 again only one of the five partners appeared and started arguing why should they pay penalty for availing OC. The original judge was absent and thus a temporary judge presided over. She again gave a new date ie. 29.11.17 for hearing
My questions:
1) what is the next step and why court keeps on postponing the action
2) what remedy does the builder has. How can he be so adamant
3) what remedy do we have
Anonymous
20 November 2017 at 15:03
In Case of Divorce advocate of both side are same
G Saravanan
20 November 2017 at 12:23
Sir
I was a Steno C before as Dec. 2006 and my date of increment was February 2007. Based on the Department of Expenditure up-gradation order, my pay was to be fixed w.e.f 1st February 2007, in the scale from Rs.5500-9000/- to Rs.6500-10500/- with effect from 15.9.2006, based on option exercise by me. But, after I qualified in the Section Officers Examination and nomination was also made by DOPT, I chose to join as Section Officer in December, 2006 (before my next date of increment viz., February, 2007). After joining I gave my option to fix my pay w.e.f. February, 2007. But on DOPT's advice taken by my Office, my earlier option was treated as ceased to operate and my pay was fixed in the new post of Section Officer under the normal pay fixation rules (with notional pay). But they took my pay in the previous post as on 15th September, 2007 (as per up-gradation) as the basis, but not my pay in the previous post w.e.f. my date of increment viz., February, 2007. Is this right or not?
krishna
20 November 2017 at 12:19
my name in sslc mark sheet as Krishna kumar, in hsc , degree, master degree, printed as krishnakumar. In sslc there is a space between krisha and kumar. . SSLC Passed in 2010. There is no spelling mistake , but in sslc mark sheet only one space is there. . Will it give problem for government jobs , foreign jobs . . give me a good solution. .
Divya
20 November 2017 at 12:03
Respected Experts
From Bombay Civil Court, I have obtained a decree against a partnership firm and its 2 partners and another employee "signing authority of firm"
By the time I start to gather evidences for execution I learnt that partnership firm has got dissolved and partnership firm also never had any assets. A company has got informed in due course bearing same name as partnership firm and declarations were given to MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS that FIRM AND COMPANY ARE ASSOCIATED with each other.
1) under such scenario, can i directly file execution application against COMPANY before company tribunal or do i file an execution application before civil court for attachment and sale of company assets
2) signing authority of partnership firm also has formed his own private company where he is a director. Can i file exeuction application against his newly formed company before company tribunal or do i approach
a civil court for execution against his newly formed company
please share ur expert advise
Thankyou
Anonymous
20 November 2017 at 11:58
in a divorce case when last hearing is pending in court we ask form our lawyer to show the papers which is going to submit in relating to our case. but he refuse to show the papers.
we does not have any papers but we want to check what is the claims in the paper.
please guide me what is remedy available to us.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
For quash 417,420,376,506 ipc
It is respectfully submitted that the 1st respondent alleged to have been lodged a report to the 2nd respondent police station on 29.7.2015 stating that she and the petitioner are working as Police Constables in I.T. Cell in Cyberabad Police Commissionerate. It is alleged that the petitioner made the 1st respondent promised her to marry and made her to believe him. It is alleged that on 11.7.2015, the petitioner and the 1st respondent went to Yadagirigutta Temple on a bike, where he booked a room without her knowledge and raped her and promised that he will marry. It is further alleged that the petitioner made a phone call to the 1st respondent and said that marriage engagement was completed with his relative girl and that he and his family members threatened her to kill, if she disclose anything to any one. Basing on the said allegations, the police registered the FIR and subsequently filed the charge sheet. 2. It is respectfully submitted that the alleged offence under Section 376 IPC, according to the 1st respondent was occurred on 11.7.2015, whereas, she made report to the police station on 29.7.2015. Therefore, there is an abnormal delay in lodging the report to the police station. Further, the medical report also certified that there is no evidence of recent sexual intercourse. There is also contradictory statements of the 1st respondent from complaint to the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C (. On the ground of abnormal delay and in absence of the medical report, the essential ingredients under Section 376 IPC do not attract, therefore, the proceedings relating to the said offence are liable to be quashed. ( Is it possible or not ?) 3. Now her marriage was fixed and both are agreed to compromise as for CrPC 482.. But her layer is misguided her it's not possible, future problems will happen in personal life and services Maters. Please clarify