Sumit Kumar Vashist
26 May 2018 at 12:24
HI,
I am an Indian boy and married a Nepali girl last year in Gurudwara. Now I want to get our marriage registered in Delhi.
Please suggest the whole procedure with required docs.
Anonymous
26 May 2018 at 12:04
Sir,
My case -
My wife has made false allegation on me under section 376, 377 and 498 on me.
Similar section 376 and 498 was charged on my brother.
Section 498 is imposed on My Parents, brother's wife and Uncle.
My wife's medical report is negative and there is no date mentioned for any event in the FIR.
FIR is registered in her hometown while as per FIR these event took place in other cities.
They have just bribed the police and get the FIR done as per their wish.
FIR has lot of framed stories in one go like my brother raped her, I did un-natural sex, my parents beaten her and tried to kill her, we kept asking for dowry and tortured her, I tried to get her raped by my two friend and then made a video of same and black-mailed her etc.
Except me rest all have got proceeding stay while I have got the bail. For bail, I have got the instruction from Supreme court.
I have also filed a divorce case which is in process.
My Question-
Me and my brother have the same charge sheet. We tried to quash this charge sheet in Allahabad High court.
As a result, High court has given proceeding stay to my brother and nothing to me.
So in the lower session court, where this case is being heard, my case is not moving ahead because in the same charge sheet one has got the stay and other has not.
My wife and her family never attended any hearing and we always get a new date.
Now my worry is because of this case I am not able to fly abroad as my job demands it. Also I am not able to switch my job because I fail in background verification. So my carreer is on toss until this case closes
Please suggest me what can I do to make this case reach the decision quickly?
Thanks
Best Regards
Partha Roy
26 May 2018 at 11:41
Who is taking over as President of NCDRC after Justice D.K.Jain steps down on 30/06/2018? Is it likely to be Justice R.K Agarwal?
V.N.K. MENON
26 May 2018 at 11:08
SHALL BE GRATEFUL TO EXPERTS FOR WISDOM, I AM PLANNING TO PRACTICE FROM AUGUST.
NECESSARY HISTORY OF THE MATTER
=================================
My wife had purchased a property {in agricultural land area/ Lal Dora area where regn. was not mandatory in Delhi} by way of GPA/Affidavit etc. for running a school. The owner died before registering the transaction. He was a member of governing body of the school. His heirs, after his death, alleged forgery of documents and by influencing the police filed FIR.
(1) The FIR was transferred to Economic Offence Wing [EOW] with the label of land-grabbing whereas my wife has been in possession of the property. [The I/O was later arrested in graft cases in a sting operation by a channel in some other case].
(2) EOW took up case contrary to parameters and guidelines. There is RTI reply from Police HQ that EOW takes up cases of more than 2 crores. The property admittedly of 80-90 lakhs value [ as per case diary] and according to circle rates declared at that time by Delhi Govt. it is about 30 lakhs.
(3) The documents (as Questioned Documents) were sent by I/O to FSL alongwith some manufactured documents including specimen writing of my wife.
(4) About Standard Documents [i/o’s forgery]:
(i) Though Lease Deed admitted as genuine by heirs [ wife of diseased by way of affidavit] of late owner was seized from them by I/O was never sent to sent to FSL as a Standard Document.
(ii) The heir had admitted in deposition that her husband had no bank account.
(iii) Whereas I/O presented some cheques purportedly made by diseased alongwith specimen signature card, and it is judicially noticeable that the signature on the card grossly differs from signature on the cheque and bank made mockery of specimen signature card system.
(iv) According to Forensic rules only similar class of docs can be compared: “Bob cannot be compared with jack”. “Comparison can only be apple-to-apple”.
(5) I/O before filing charge sheet arrested my wife from school on the charges of absconding since he allegedly could not find her at residence during school hours.
(6) Without presenting the court the FSL report he in connivance with ACMM remanded her to Judicial custody saying that FSL report has confirmed forgery which is false. Request for location of mobilephone of I/O was ignored by ACMM. Principle of audi alterm partem was given a go-by. After about four days, she was released by the order of Sessions remarking that the matter is of a civil nature.
(7) Afterwards only, charge sheet was presented alongwith FSL report. The charge sheet and FSL report clearly exonerated my wife in terms: “ it is not possible to fix authorship” of Questioned Documents on my wife.
QUERY
======
[Matter has not reached finality in trial court]
(1) Can I approach Supreme Court as spouse u/A-32 COI for infringement of fundamental rights and for taking action against I/O and ACMM? Guidance shall be highly appreciated.
(2) Who should be made opposite parties:
(i) whether I/O and Police Commissioner.
(ii) How can I make ACMM as party, what is the rule.
(iii) Is there any limitation in filing SLP . As there is a case law that order obtained by fraud can be challenged at any time to bring culprits to book.
thank you once again.
vallabh_raut
26 May 2018 at 10:01
Hello Experts,
We (brother,father, sisters and me) are fighting DV filed by brother's wife. She has also filed 125 on my brother. The CrPC 125 case is in evidence stage. Her cross is over. She has asked the court to send summons to the Talathi of our native place claiming we have ancestral property there ( as he (allegedly) refused to give her 7/12 records ). This is just to extend the evidence. She has already produced the 7/12 records in the DV case an year before. Now, can we ask the CrPC 125 court to accept the 7/12 records she has produced in the DV case so that time gets saved?
Karishma Sadhwani
26 May 2018 at 08:50
Hi, I want to start a Studies Abroad Consultany, where we would be providing guidence, coaching and also visa assistance. Want are the legal requirements for this
Brijmohan Khadia
26 May 2018 at 07:54
Good morning.
I am Indian and my passport is from Delhi.
I am living in Japan and want to marry a Japanese here.
Marriage officer here asked me to get the unmarried certificate and a certificate from my parents stating that I am unmarried from India.
Indian embassy in Japan can issue bachelor certificate but they said i need to ask my parents to get an affidavit (there is no such certificate).
My parents have moved to Gurgaon from Delhi.
Please tell me how should my parents proceed with affidavit and where can we get this attested from.
Regards
Jaswanth Adapa
26 May 2018 at 07:53
TSSPDCL has recently conducted exam for the Post of Junior Accounts Officer for 100 Marks (Part A for 80 marks and Part B for 20 Marks).
I have got 70 Marks (56 Marks in Part A and 14 Marks in Part B) and I was ranked 93rd. My Date of Birth is 22.05.1987
For the same 70 Marks, a Candidate whose Date of Birth is 30.07.1995 was given 69th Rank, becasue he scored better marks than me in Part A. (His scoring was Part A 62 marks and 8 Marks in Part B).
As per my understanding and time tested principle, which is usually adopted by UPSC/ TSPSC or any other Institiution in case of a Tie of Marks is that, The Person who is Older in Age is given better rank than Candidate whose is younger.
But in my case, first preference in ranking was given to that candidate who secured better marks in Part A , instead of Age being given first preference.
Had the Selection of Candidates been made on the Basis of Age (in case of equal marks), I would stand a chance to get Selected and find a place in the Selection List.
Even the Notification inviting application for the Job, never mentioned the fact that Weightage will be Given to Part A while ranking Students. Not even the Service Regulations of TSSPDCL speaks about Tie Breaking Principle.
Very recently I have got to know that the entire Selection Procedure (including Certification Verification, Executing Bond etc) has been completed by TSSPDCL and is in the process of issuing Appointment Letters in a day or two.
During these Vacations, my Case could not be accepted by the Telangana High Court, because Service Matters were not taken up by the Judge.
In View of the above Situation,
1. I would like to know my Legal Position.
2. What is the Settled Law Position with respect to giving priority to age over marks in Part A.
3. Do I stand a chance in getting/ winning this case and secure a seat in TSSPDCL.
4. Do I need to worry because the entire Selection Procedure will get over, by the time Courts Resume on 04.06.2018.
I am giving links to the following for reference, as i am unable to attach the same.
1. Notification: https://www.tssouthernpower.com/ShowProperty/CP_CM_REPO/Pages/Careers/Direct%20Recruitment%20to%20JAO
2. Merit List: https://www.tssouthernpower.com/ShowProperty/CP_CM_REPO/Pages/Careers/JAO%20Results%20Qualified
3. Service Regulations adopted by TSSPDCL: http://apsebea.org/files/APSEB%20Service%20Regulations%20final.pdf
Any help is highly Appreciated !!
Manish Tripathi
26 May 2018 at 07:47
Madam/Dear sir,
Health Insurance TPA of India limited is a joint venture Company with 4 Public sector Health Insurance Companies-United India Insurance Company, New India, National Insurance and Oriental Insurance Company. Each company have 23.75 shareholding in concerned JV named, Health Insurance TPA of India limited it means 95% shrareholding with 4 PSU and rest 5% is with GIC. JV Company, Health Insurance TPA of India limited has been audited by auditor appointed by CAG.
Whether it is a Government Company or Government subsidiary Company or PSU or a Private Company. Please share the exact status of the Company.
Do JV Company will follow Government rules and regulation regarding their employees benefits?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Marriage certificate
I want to get date of birth of my spouse in our marriage certificate. Request intimate the procedure to be followed