Manish V V
11 June 2018 at 11:33
A sale deed in the year 1961was executed in favour of two persons(buyers),one is major and the other is minor.The two persons are relatives but the major is not the Guardian of the minor.Is the deed valid?
Anonymous
11 June 2018 at 08:44
Dear all
I need to know what are the general rules and rights of a women on divorce i.e. alimony, child custody etc. Kindly please help.
Rahul
11 June 2018 at 01:20
BEING THE VICTIM
BY CHOICE/MISTAKE/FORCE/LAW
Nobody in the whole world wants to become a victim by their own choice.
Mistake can be big or it can be small. Each mistakes have their own consequences But mistake is a mistake which nobody wanted to commit intentionally.Everyone wants to lead a good life without any problem.
circumstances and mostly the lack of experience is the reason that forcibly pushes human beings towards mistake.
Courts are known to serve justice to the citizens by the judges.
The judicial system should not become a support system for the people's who are bullying the innocents.
Financiers are players, they know the law, as they used it several times according to them.
if everything has to go according to the law book then what is the need of judges. It can be done with the help of computers.
The basic difference between a machine and a human being is feeling.
Why innocents are scared of the word COURT. this is a word which should give confidence to the innocent people's for justice.
Many personalities are scared to talk against the judicial. No matter they receive justice or not but most of the people's say � I have full faith in the judiciary system� but that's only in front of media.
The Constitution of India starts with
It's WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA
That clearly States, Nothing is bigger than the people's of India.
And importantly JUDICIARY IS NOT ABOVE THE PEOPLES OF INDIA.
Why in Faridabad the antisocial elements using COURTS as there last step of bullying innocents.
Antisocial elements - financiers
Innocents. -youngsters
Steps of financiers to bully the innocent
1- searching the youngsters can be influenced easily by some bad habits of playing pool table on bets or like guys show interest in cricket betting. Etc. And capable of paying a high-interest rate
2- use mediators to convey the message and tempting young guns to grab easy loan without guarantee.
3- lending money at high interest against blank signed cheques and blank signed papers.
4- enforce per day penalties in case of the single day delay in interest by youngsters.
5- threatening and abusing innocents on phone to increase the rate of interest.
6- even after getting 300-400% of the principal amount in interest still showing no mercy to the youngsters.
7- breaking bones of innocents if they approach the police.
LAST AND FINAL STEP
8- filling blank cheques with a double triple of the principal amount or if the innocent have any property on his name then the blank signed papers will convert in agreement to sell then in last they will send COURT NOTICE to youngsters.
One mistake of signing a blank cheque and blank paper by the youngsters become a threat to their life.
One mistake puts everything on the line.
the antisocial elements who can't even step inside the court without their 10-12 boys group.
. It's not wrong to make a group but it shows the intention especially
When everyone has the history of FIRs in different police stations.
Can they innocent enough that a decent guy can make them fool and they feel helpless enough to knock the door of court.
One mistake proves to be NO WAY OUT for the innocents
In Faridabad court honorable judge sunil Kumar Ji starts the proceeding by saying �vakil sahab paiso ki teyaari karwao client ki nahi toh andar jaana padega� at this point the defendant's lost 50% of the case .if it has to go one sided way then what is the need of THE TRIAL??
What is the way out for the victim???
If victim denies paying interest then financiers play their power game
If victim breaks all contacts then finances send musclemen to their home.
If victim family ask financiers for settlement then they demand four times of the principal amount
If victim lodge complains in police then financiers musclemen break their bones. And one of the guy from the group surrenders himself.
If the police take action. Which is very very rare then financiers sends LEGAL NOTICE to the victim.
Once the legal notice served to the victim Then police say their favourite dialogue �WE CANT DO ANYTHING ABOUT THIS AS THE MATTER IS IN COURT. �
Is one mistake is too big, that financiers bunch of mistakes stands nowhere in the eye of law???
What about mistakes of the culprits -
1. Giving loan with the bad intentions
2. Forcing youth to work as their bounded labour for high interest and penalties
3. Taking documents with the sense of fraud.
4. Not showing the high-interest income in their ITR
5. Not paying INCOME TAX of high-interest income
6. Threatening and abusing on phone
7. Making a team of musclemens and put them on standby to fight
8. Forcibly dragging innocents to their office
9. Mental torture
10. Physical torture
11. Creating bad scenes outside the victim home
12. Using blank cheque without the consent of account holder.
13. Taking blank pages signature for formality purpose and using the signatures and claim properties.
14. Transforming blank paper into an agreement to sell
15. Transforming blank paper into cash receipt.
16. Filling a false court case.
Surely court is not liable for anybody's mistake. but can court make culprit liable for their mistakes???
Or court agenda is to go according to the law books.
If it is enough to get a bounced cheque in the hand, to claim the money by saying it FRIENDLY LOAN. Then there is no use of earning money by the hard way, everyone will try to grab the cheques to file the case
what should a defendant can do to prove his/her innocence or that's it for the defendant? Or One mistake is much heavier than sixteen mistakes.
Because it doesn't matter to court weather
A) Complainant has the capacity to give a loan of a certain amount.
B) Complainant relations are enough strong with defendant to lend friendly loan.
.
C) Complainant mode of payment is by cash.
D) Complainant is financially strong enough to give 3-4-5-6-7 and more lacs rupees as a friendly loan but didn't file ITR.
E) A occward point to say but still, the point is why most of the defendant are youngsters
Honourable judges treated as gods by the citizens. They have a big power which comes with a big responsibility.
The court should keep this in mind that if there is a huge gap between the buyer and seller in agreement to sell cases then judges should be more careful with their decision.
Because
Most of the youngsters of 25-30 yrs are not capable enough to.buy a property. It's the parents who purchased the property on their son or daughter name.
Normally in Indian families, the right to sell the property never handed to the youngsters of 25-26-27-28 yrs of age.
Yes they are adult enough to the take decisions, but again its in the book of law.
But when defendant deny the execution of sale agreement then the court must keep this point and call defendant's parents for statements and observe the reality..
NO DOUBT ON THE CAPABILITY OF OUR HONORABLE JUDGES BUT SOME QUESTIONS WHICH NEED TO BE ANSWERS BY HONORABLE JUDGES ONLY FOR THE PEOPLE
QUESTION NUMBER ONE
SIGNING BLANK CHEQUES AND BLANK PAPERS DUE TO LACK OF EXPERIENCE AND INFLUENCE ARE ENOUGH TO BECOME A VICTIM???
QUESTION NUMBER TWO
HOW CAN A INNOCENT PROVE HIS INNOCENSE IN A CHEQUE BOUNCING CASE
QUESTION NUMBER THREE
HOW CAN A INNOCENT PROVE HIS INNOCENSE IN A FALSE UNREGISTERED AGREEMENT TO SELL CASE????
EVERY UNREGISTERED FINANCER IS CONFIDENT ENOUGH THAT HE CAN EASILY GRAB THREE TO FOUR TIMES OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT WITH THE HELP OF COURT, SO THEY LEND MONEY EASILY TO PEOPLES AGAINST BLANK SIGNED DOCUMENTS.
THEY ARE CONFIDENT ENOUGH THAT COURT ARE NOT CAPABLE ENOUGH TO EXTRACT THE TRUTH OF THE CASE.
WHAT IS THE WAY OUT
IN BOUNCE CHEQUE. FRAUD CASE
IN UNREGISTERED AGREEMENT OF SELL
???????????????????????????????????????
meghana
10 June 2018 at 21:10
i am a married woman, we have no kids, i and my husband co-own a property, since my husband is paying EMI alone he is harassing me to work so that the financial burden can be equally shared.my husband is taking care of my in-laws. what to do ? please advise. is my husband correct in forcing me to work.
Anonymous
10 June 2018 at 20:56
Hi, After my daughter's birth on 26 July 2016,I haven't collected her birth certificate from the BMC office till date. I have all the documents from the hospital available with me. Kindly advise the procedure to get her birth certificate
Shiv Gawale
10 June 2018 at 20:06
Sir,
Following information demanded my wife to my department under rti act, I am working in a government sector employee kindly guide me can department has any right to provide such information yes or no, if the answer is no in that case provide such rule or detail.
My wife & me stay separately since 6 years, she demanded information regarding my salary slip, service records, attendants records & nominee under rti act.
rakshnda bajaj
10 June 2018 at 15:13
the application for execution of immovable property relating to Wakaf Act,1995 by the decree holder which was dismissed in default by the court after calling the parties for several times. An application for the restoration of the said execution was filed thereafter in time and the same was also dismissed in default in the like manner. now we, the judgement debtor understands that now the execution cannot be undertaken despite the provision of filling execution application during the 12 years period as prescribed by the limitation act. The law cannot allow the creation of nuisance of filing any number of applications for execution during the period of 12 years. whether we are free from the liability of execution of our property held by the Wakaf Board? whether restoration of 2nd execution application dismissed in default the 2nd time permissible in law?
Gururajan
10 June 2018 at 15:07
We are from an apartment of 24 flats in coimbatore Tamilnadu. We have an association which was registered under societies. But due to some oversight we did not renew our registration and now we have been detegistered. For validating our renewal the registrar is asking Rs 50000 which our members feel too much. Now our members questions are
1. Is it mandatory to register the association in Tamil Nadu
2. What are the benefits of being a registered association.
3. Can we register when it is mandatory
Secondly
We propose to construct a kind of an enclosed shed at the terrace for the use as office as we don�t have one.
1. Do we need to take approval for such construction fromCoimbatore municipal corporation.
2. If yes what is the procedure?
Grateful to have your guidance
Tks
Gururajan
Anonymous
10 June 2018 at 14:13
hello,
earlier i am able to get my case status from ecourt site, but today i try to check then its shows " record not found"
please guide in this...
thank you
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Advice regarding dv case
My mother filed a DV case against my father in 2016 after continued mental and physical torture,till this day no protection order of any sort has been passed by any judge presiding over this case but now the judge is going to pass an order to force my mother to do an inventory of her belongings as requested by my father through his lawyer,meanwhile my father is still slapping and punching my mother and harassing her.
Edit:My father left the shared household in 2015 and then came back and started staying on the first floor of the house which we have no access to and he has no access to the ground floor either.The property is jointly owned by both of them.The lawyer that we have been assigned to,through free legal aid is not co-operating with us either.We have made several police complaints but to no avail.