Sukhija
25 March 2009 at 12:53
Hi
1. I want to know that if an account is in the name of a person as e.g. " Gandhi, HUF", then can a person in his individual capacity as Gandhi file a complaint u/s138? The payee will be " Gandhi, HUF", rt? not only Gandhi?
2. If Gandhi, HUF is not named as the complainant then can it be said that complaintant Mr. Gandhi has no locus standii to file complaint? what are the chances of acquittal for accused?
3. Can anyone provide citation to help accused?
Regards.
Jainodin shaikh
25 March 2009 at 12:37
What is the enforcement date for The Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Acth 2008?
Can anybody please clear today's possition of this new amendments?
SHIESTA007
25 March 2009 at 00:54
Mr A is the owner of the vacant plot. One evening, when A visits, his vacant property and notices that a shed construction has been started and later when made shifting enquires and comes to know that someone has sold A property to D.
A comes to know that the property has been sold way back before 2 yrs and finds in the mutation records that one Mr Z has made GPA of A and then sold to his family member Mr Y. Then Mr Y has sold to Mr D.
Mr A has filed criminal and civil case against all the frauds.
My query is as follows
When Mr A took the property in 1980 it was for Rs 80,000/- and now when the land grabber Mr z and Mr y has sold it to Mr D in 2006 it is for Rs 10,00,000/-. The suit filed is for the cancellation of the fraudulent Sale deeds and Should Mr A pay the required court fee of 10% of Rs 10,00,000/- for the cancellation and possession of the suit property?
The titles are clear sale deed in the name of the Mr A and when the frauds have made the illegal, bogus documents and created and made mutation in their names in the record of rights but still Mr A has to pay the court fees of 10% of Rs 10,00,000 is it correct ? The layman is not able to pay that much of amount and so is it correct that without payment of the court fees he should not go ahead with the next procedure?
If the frauds do such business then i dont think that the layman would be able to get justice. He would not only be mentally harrassed to see that someone has grabbed his land and when he is unable to pay the court fees, that for his own land he has to pay for his own property , How far is it correct?
so please kindly provide me with the citations that supports Mr A as he is a common man and there is injustice happening in his case.
Kumar Gaurav
24 March 2009 at 17:34
Some consumers filed cases against our company. And the court awarded interest alongwith cost of machine. machine already returned & recd by the company. Now the question is that interest being paid to consumers attracts TDS/not? Please guide by providing the supporting case law.
mohan
24 March 2009 at 15:48
Sir, i am living in madurai. When i going to educational institution for admit my child, at that time, the school management authority asked community certificate for my child for admission. I told to them i am not interested to that. But they strongly object it and ask community certificate to admit my child. Now i am asking you whether it is possible to admit my child with out produce that certificate.
Jitendra Raval
24 March 2009 at 15:44
I would like to share with my seniors follwing
The complainant claimed that accused issued two cheques Rs. 2 lac and Rs. 42000 on 01.08.2008 for full alleged debt.it was deposited and returned undpaid. Immediately after returned of cheques the complainant sent the legal notice to the accused without mentioning the cheque numbers in the notice. The complainat thought, the notice may be void as there was no mention of cheque numbers and did not take any action other then sending notice.
The complainant had thired cheque in his possession. Again he filled the amount Rs. 242000 dated 21.09.08 and present the cheque for payment which was returned unpaid. The notice served to the accused but not received by the accused and confirmed by the postal authorities about the wrong delivery.
The suit was filed on 01.11.08
Inlight of above facts..Please give your expert opinion about following.
1 Whether the case filed on the basis of second notice will not be time barred? As the debit is same and payment was stated to be made in full.
02. Whether first notice without cheque numbers was valid?
Address written on the notices was correct but it was written in Gujarati language and hence the error commited by the concered postman and wrongly intimated to C-103 instead of C-703
Please convery your views preferabally site the related caselaws if possible.
With regards
ANANDARAJ
24 March 2009 at 13:29
please tell me a good reputed books for legal draftings.
ANANDARAJ
24 March 2009 at 13:29
please tell me a good reputed books for legal draftings.
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
23 March 2009 at 23:27
Is there any way to check the INCOME TAX RETURN CHECK on INTERNET?
some taxprectishners are disguising innocent people.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 payee Gandhi HUF
Hi
1. I want to know that if an account is in the name of a person as e.g. " Gandhi, HUF", then can a person in his individual capacity as Gandhi file a complaint u/s138? The payee will be " Gandhi, HUF", rt? not only Gandhi?
2. If Gandhi, HUF is not named as the complainant then can it be said that complaintant Mr. Gandhi has no locus standii to file complaint? what are the chances of acquittal for accused?
3. Can anyone provide citation to help accused?
Regards.