LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Lt Col atultyagi   18 April 2009 at 14:22

uprooting of trees

In a govt registered residential society, the elected committee has decided to axe some trees - erect, shady & young.
On query, the answer given are:-
- It has been decided by the committee.
- The reasons for decisions cannot be disclosed.
Questions:-
- What are the conditions which are required to be fulfilled before a tree can be axed?
- can a an elected committee of registered residential society take a decision of this nature & callupon private labour to axe the tree present in the colony premise?
- To what extent the Right to Information can be exercised in this case?
Some body who is clear may like to throw light on the issue.
Lt Col Atul Tyagi
Advocate

Lt Col atultyagi   18 April 2009 at 14:16

uprooting of trees

In a govt registered residential society, the elected committee has decided to axe some trees - erect, shady & young.
On query, the answer given are:-

ramesh   18 April 2009 at 13:47

salary not paid

I was employed by a company registerd in Isle of Man and having corporate office in Dubai. Chairman of the company in which I was employed is also Chairman of one of the Indian company registered in India. I am not paid salary for six months and local living allowance for 5 months. I am holding outstanding certificate duly issued by the company management. Now let me know how to recover my dues.
ramesh

Krishna Marathe   18 April 2009 at 13:46

Transfer of land

what would be procedure if father wanted to transfer aggricultural land to his sons name.

Vibhu Ranjan   18 April 2009 at 13:28

PIL

Can anyone tell me how to file a PIL.

JANAK GANDHI   18 April 2009 at 12:52

CRPC U/S 391 READ WITH 401

OUR LAWYER DID NOT EXHIBITED IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS IN THE TRAIL COURT THOUGH FILED DURING THE COURSE OF VARIOUS HEARINGS AND ALSO THE SESSION COURT DID NOT CONSIDER.NOW WE HAVE MOVED TO HIGHCOURT THRU IA AFTER FILING CRIMINAL REVISION U/S 391 READ WITH 401 TO ENTERTAIN THE DOCUMENTS ALREADY ON RECOERD.
CAN YOU ALL EXPERTS SUGGEST SOME DECISIONS OF SC OR MPHC ENABLING TO QUOTE.TKS

Geetha R S   18 April 2009 at 12:38

Retainership based hiring

Dear expert,

Most of the corporates these days hire manpower on retainership basis for a year - 3 years on professional fee. The fee normally is revised based on the basis of performance or as agreed upon at the time of engaging the concerned person as a retainer. My question is -
a) Are there any laws in India that states what % or number in an Organization can be hired as a retainer.
b) What are the precautionary steps an employer should take with regard to this??

Kindly help,
-Geetha

Natarajan L   18 April 2009 at 11:56

Mishandling of Account - ICICI

Dear All,

I have an account with ICICI and my card was used fradulently; have blocked the account immediately on noticing the same and made written complaint with FIR in local police station.

This happend in Jan 09 but ICICI not responding to my claim.

Surprisingly, received some more debits in Mar 09 through some card number which was never received by me.

Need your guidance on the action that could be initiated to fix this matter and to make ICICI to pay compensation.

Thanks
Natraj

Chhaya Soni   18 April 2009 at 11:44

PoA for consideration subsist after the death ?

Respected lawyers,

If a land owner executes a registered PoA in favour of another person giving rights to sell the landed property for a consideration, and the another person sells to third party for the same or more consideration, I just wanted to know whether such PoA remains subsisted and valid if before or after the sell to third party an original land owner dies. The PoA is for consideration, i.e. the original owner has recieved consideration for execution of such PoA from the another person.

Jacob Joseph   18 April 2009 at 10:24

Cheque Dishourning

Dear Sir,

We have put complaint against Cheque Bouncing of Rs. 45 Lakhs unfortunately the Order came against us in Magestrate Court. We went to High Court where our case was not Admitted. Whether we can file again in High Court to another bench or we have to go to Supreme Court. If Supreme Court then can you suggest who will be best Law Firm to fight our case.