DEVENDRA
24 April 2009 at 22:14
In Maharashtra co-op.societies Act, there are two sections regarding recovery of loans. One u/s 101 and another u/s 91.
Enquiry u/s 101 is quasi judicial and is of summary nature. Whereas u/s 91, full trial is conducted.
In such circumstances, if one society approaches u/s 101 for recovery of arrears of loan amount till the date of filing application, and obtains certificate u/s 101, and on failuer to recover the amount, the sociaty approaches u/s 91 to recover entire loan amount ( and not only arrears ), then whether the act of the society to apply u/s 91 wil be res-judicata ?
If anyone has citation regarding it, please convey.
yogesh
24 April 2009 at 21:44
Dear Sir,
I will be grateful, if you provide me the information on the following:
I have filed an O.A application along with the Annexures and Miscallenous Application (M.A) which was attached with the O.A
Please inform whether I will get the M.A Number along with the O.A Number or I should have to file it separately?
Thanking you,
Regards
yogesh
24 April 2009 at 21:34
Dear Sir,
I will be grateful if you provide me the proper information on the following:
I have filed the Application in The Central Administrative Tribunal (4 sets) as there are two respondents along with the postal order and two file sized envelope and I was informed that it will take 2-3 days for scrutinizing purpose and then will provide the O.A Number
Please inform whether the registrar office( Filing Office) will send the copy of application to the respondents ? or I will have to send the copy via speed post/Registry to each Respondent?
Whether there will be any process fees in the Registrar office (Filing Office) will send the same to the respondents? Please inform me the amount of fees?
Whether at the time of admission of application, the respondents will be informed that the application will be admitted ? or they will summoned to appear only after hearing from the applicant side?
How can I know about the date of admission as the cause list will be displayed on the same date?
Thanking you
A Truthseeker
24 April 2009 at 20:49
in The Mahabharata we got Droupadi was rescued when Dushyashan attempted to denude her.but Bhima was so exasperated as he took the vow to kill and drink the blood o Dushyashan. that signifies how the Indian women were looked at once upon a time.in IPC outraging modesty of an woman is a bailable offence.sud this British legacy still exist in Indian law?
vinod bansal
24 April 2009 at 17:56
R/All
when we can say that court has taken cognizance spl. in private complaint cases & in FIR (State) Cases, My query is in context of section 197 crpc in which sanction order is compulsary while taking cognizance against a public servent..in my case i had filed a pvt. complaint against Supdt. Of Police & preliminary evidence has closed & now case is fixed for consideration/order on summoning.whether sanction is mandatory prior to issue summoning order against a public servent in complaint case.
vinod bansal
24 April 2009 at 17:49
R/All
I filed a private criminal complaint in magistrate case uss 323/452/506 IPC in which accused were acquitted now i want to file an appeal/revision against this acquittal,what is provision & i have to move directly in highcourt as it is a complaint (acquittal) case or i can file appeal/revision before sessions court.Thanks
rgurucharan
24 April 2009 at 17:07
Dear sir,
We are a private Trust, catering education to MBA & PGDM for management students. which is also registered under the Indian Trust Act 1882.
we are established in karnataka (Bangalore), Whether the Shops and establishment act is applicable? If so, pls guide me with what are the provisions are applicable.
with regards,
R. Gurucharan.
rgurucharan
24 April 2009 at 15:58
Dear sir,
The term "Establishment" used in the The Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. can u pls give me the definition.
The term "Establishment" includes the Private trust?
with regards,
R. Gurucharan.
Ranganath
24 April 2009 at 15:39
Ld counsels,
Below is the sequence of events.
1. Compliant's father files a complaint
2. Statement was recorded from complainants daughter and the opposite party
3. Complaint was withdrawn without registering any FIR
4. After one month another compliant was filed by the daughter with addtinal allegations.
5. FIR registered. It was mentioend in the FIR that first information was received on the date of second complaint. But there was no mention of first complaint in FIR.
Is this legally right way of registering the FIR based on a second complaint one month after the first compliant and mentioning that first informaiton is received on the date of second compliant in FIR registration form.
Please clarify
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Application for early hearing
Respected All
I filed a pvt crl complaint against Supdt. of police in the court of chief judicial magistrate & today case was fixed for arguments,arguments were advanced by me & now case is fixed for 20-7-09 for consideration on summoning, Magistrate is biased & he knowingly case adjourned for a long date,I want to file a Application for early hearing,what should be grounds & what is remedy available to me in this regard.Thanks