Binod Kumar Mishra
23 February 2009 at 15:51
i have filled 2 informatory petitions against the misdeeds of my in-laws. later on filled a divorce suit on 22.8.2007. after receiving notice my spouse had filled a 498(A) case against me and my family members. all the family members got anticipatory from high court at ranchi. now i have filled the same in high court at ranchi. my wife is getting maintanance from me. the stage of my divroce case is that witnesses are examined. issue had been settled. will i get anticipatory bail. i am a govt. servant.
vijendran
23 February 2009 at 14:48
iam not able to wearing helmet because i feel
uneasy and also it is difficult for me.
but the traffic police fined me for not wearing helmet.
please some body help me how to avoid and how to convince traffice police.
there is any document or certificate showable to police at the time of not wearing
helmet?
is it compulsory to wear helmet and who are all exempted to wear.
manish
23 February 2009 at 12:30
judgement given under citation
K.Prakashan Vs. P. K. Surenderan reported in 2007 (4) Crimes 21 (sc)
Vinay Parulekar Vs. Pramod Meshram, 2008 (2) Mh. L. J. Pg 115 (Bom).
Krishna Janardhan Bhatt Vs. Dattatraya G. Hegde, 2008 (4)Mh. L. J. pg. 354 S.C.(D.B) 2008 Cr. L. R. (sc) 102
can any body send the extract of above judgemt
advocate satya
23 February 2009 at 11:15
Dear friends
one case has been decided in favour of the labour as the advocate for the management left the company when the case came to the stage of workmans evidence, the advocate did not informed the company about the next date so no one went in the proceeding further, can a review for setting aside the ex parte order can be filed, and any relevant citation is there for the case?
please guide me with your knowledge as it is very urgent, thanking all of you
Rajaram C Iyer
22 February 2009 at 22:31
Dear Shri. M. P. Perumal,Mr Palnitkar and Mr. Arora.
My question is still unanswered and I don't agree with you. some of the States having its own RTI Act are as follows
1. The Tamil Nadu Right to Information Act, 1997
2. The Delhi Right to Inforamtion Act, 2001
3. The Rajasthan RTI Act, 2000
4. The Orissa Right to Information Act, 2002
5. The Karnataka RTI ACt, 2000
6. Goa RTI ACt, 1997
7. The Assam RTI Act, 2000 Etc
My question whether information pertaining to a particular state government office can be sought invoking the Central Act or do I have to invoke the respective State Act. Please clarify?.
Rajaram C Iyer
22 February 2009 at 16:40
DEar Ld. Members,
Please clarify my dout. Every State Government has its own State Information Commission and Act. My question is can we seek information from State Government invoking the Central Act i.e The Right to Information Act?
amit
22 February 2009 at 14:32
Dear sir,
'A' is a proprietor of his firm in U.P.& wants to transfer his proprietorship to 'B'.
what r the formalities of sale tax, income tax & which forms no.is used in the above formmality & what procedure should 'A' adopt.
jayachandran
22 February 2009 at 13:29
whether under any circumstance, a High Court be closed. It is not declaring holiday, but closure. kindly enlighten
Bindu
22 February 2009 at 10:01
Sir,
I was working with one firm, there was 138 mattter filed in court-the said complaint was prepared by my colleague, I was not aware about the facts of the case.
Our firm asked to file vakalatnama us(my colleague & me) on behalf of firm.
The matter was filed in court by my colleague using the same vakalatnama.
Soon after that my colleague left the firm, and after a months time I joined an independent lawyer.
Wht happened in that case, the accused approached me & asked me to appear for her.
My query is can I file my vakalatnama on her behalf( Vakaltanama for complainant has now be signed by some other advocate from the same firm)
Can opposite advocate for complainant take objection on filing my VP. Frankly, when the complaint was handled by my earlier colleague- from drafting to filing, appearance- only the vp contains that colleague & my name. At no point of time I was aware about the facts of the case
My senior tells me I shall take up the matter
Regards,
Bindu
Member Strength 9,53,679 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Compulsory wearing of safety helmets and abolition of alcoholic drinks sales.
Respected counselors/solicitors
Can anybody clarify for the following with authentic justification clearly.
The Motor Vehicles act has been amended and orders passed regarding wearing of helmets with a view to avoid head injuries and fatal accidents in our country.
but, as this is a social issue and if anybody questions this, the answer will be for the cause of safety and welfare, everyone should follow it.
but, on the same scenerio,the after effects of alcoholic drinks and their regular consumption has led to detirioration of hundred and thousands of families from peaceful life to rugs and beggarhood.
can"t someone file a suitable petition or litigation in this regard and get orders that as this is a social issue which can cause negative effects to society and because of provision of sales and availability, people are consuming alcohokl and other intoxicating drinks.
If the government considers wearing of helmets saves life although other issues arise such as proper road maintenance.proper road traffic rules and acts, good system of traffic signaling network,proper and adequate humps etc.
moreover, in cities, due to larger and heavy congested traffic, people cannot go
more than 40kms speed within city limits .
considering all these factors if anybody can file a PIL sand fight for it in such a way that as people know the after effects of alcoholic drinks and its consumption along with government, the same is being left to the will and wish of society and its members.
in the same way, the usage of helmets can also be left to the will and wish of riders and compulsory road improvement, traffic signal system technical up gradation etc can be applied so that the society can be free from this compulsion of wearing helmets.
this has served only the helmet manufacturers lobby and has given them good profit and the so called elected bodies viz;MLA and MP some large source of finance.
i request to the experts to kindly give your genuine/practical views so that a PIL can be filed and won for the cause of good will of society.
requesting and expecting your earliest reply.
thanks and best regards
Rashmiramanath