kalyani choudhury
10 September 2009 at 16:59
I have a SLP going on in The Supreme court. The AOR is getting the official reports but I am not able to get them from him since this AOR was approached by my previous lawyer who was dismissed by me. Can anyone tell me the website address from where I can get the details of my case including the next date of hearing.riven
Shivasurya
10 September 2009 at 16:58
on 12-06-2002, the complainant trust entered a Memorandum of Understanding with one Ltd company, for becoming a franchisee of the said company. And as per the Memorandum of Understanding, the said company provided computers, 10 KVA UPS, Laser printers, Dot Matrix printers and net working products totally worth about Rs.12,00,000/- as fee for establishing College Network Lab to the complainant trust on receipt of Rs.12,00,000/- from the complainant trust for conducting Networking course to the college students of engineering college at the college campus. And according to the Memorandum of Understanding the complainant trust acted as franchisee of the said company for one year. At the time of entering the Memorandum of Understanding with complainant trust; the accused is not director of the company and only in the year 2003, he became one of the director of the said company and he is unaware about the Memorandum of Understanding entered between the complainant trust and the company.
He came to know about the Memorandum of Understanding entered between the complainant trust only in the year 2004 while seeing a copy of legal notice dated 27-01-2003, sent to the company and its erstwhile 4 directors when cleaning the office of company and he simply ignored it as it was not addressed to him. And in the month of March 2004, the secretary of the complainant trust, came to the office and informed that the company has liable to refund the balance franchisee fee of Rs.3,00,000/- out of Rs.12,00,000/- which was received by the company for giving franchisee to the complainant trust. And as the present director of the company he has to give the said amount of Rs.3,00,000/-. As he unaware about the Memorandum of Understanding entered between the complainant trust and the company, he requested the complainant to give time for verify the records for his claim regarding the MOU and assured him if the company has to repay any amount towards any liability to the complainant trust. But the complainant trust insisted him to give a cheque for Rs.3,00,000/- and promised him that he will return the said cheque, if the accused established that the company has no liability to the complainant trust in respect of the MOU. After perusal of records, the accused knew that the company is not liable to pay anything to the complainant trust and immediately sent a letter to the trust demanding return of the cheque, but the complainant trust presented the cheque and after dishonor filed case u/s.138 NI Act, only against the accused and in the complaint the complainant trust has not added the company and other directors as accused in that case. The accused is facing the trial. I need suitable citations to protect the innocent accused in that case
riven
Satya Mani Tiwari
10 September 2009 at 16:53
A complain with a malafied intention is filed aginst me which is prima facie false. The Megistrate who ordered to file the complain was personally approached, he said no revision can be made, although he adviced the same can be challanged in High court with application U/s 482. wht is the correct remedy. I am not intrested to go to high court as I am confident as it is a false complain the police will put FR other wise also but what is the proper permanent remedy this way any p[erson can play with your prestige & liberty as news paper publish on main page to defame you without any reason. Please advice.SATYA TIWARIriven
Neeraj
10 September 2009 at 16:40
I am looking for a good criminal lawyer in Ludhiana. My parents who are based there are being implicated in a false criminal case filed by a local goon.
Regards,
Neerajriven
Chetan
10 September 2009 at 16:35
What is mean by Benefit of Doubts
Explain in brief along with provisions and case lawsriven
Swapnil Kabra
10 September 2009 at 16:26
We comply with regulations in letter but not is spirit.
Whether the nature and intensity of corporate oversight has changed post satyam?riven
Apurva Kumar
10 September 2009 at 16:01
An accused was bought to court on a trial date as trial date was fixed at that day while returning to jail under the supervision of jail authority he the accused was shot to death does it come under the preview of custodial death? Any case law plzzz nybody could provide!!!! the accused was having a nice antecedent recorda!
Regards!
AP!riven
Manju
10 September 2009 at 15:59
Dear Sir/Madam,
Me and my brother bought sheds which were constructed to lease for medium scale production units.
We both have bought from the same owner which were built up on revenue land.
Its been eight years since the sheds were constructed and we are paying tax since 2002.
There is no specific plan for the layout.
After so many years he is harassing us saying that we had occupied 5ft of his plot.
He's also harassing the tenant who’s residing at our shed currently.
As there is no plan for that layout, not sure from where did he start the measurement.
Does he able to file a case against us after eight years.
One thing to mention,he has a personal grudge on us.
Its because around 6 years back he tried to cheat us in a joint loan dispute.
Hence we filed and won the case against him.
Request your inputs in this regard to proceed further.riven
fulltrottlle
10 September 2009 at 15:35
respected sir/madame,
my company has been served the notice for scrutiny u/s 143(1)for AY 07-08. in the proceedings, the ITO is asking us to furnish certains insurance claims related details for the year previous to this.upon our objections, he has demanded the same details saying this is required as the details are mentioned in P/L a/c. our p/l account always show previous years details in comparision with current years. also he is asking for opening in closing stock details for AY 06-07. his reasons being this is the only way he can assess the stocks !
q:does he have powers to ask details as mentioned ? how do i safe guard my company ?
riven
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Evidentary value of Police report
in a injunction petition U/s 151 CPC the plaintiff claimed that the defendant is creating nuisance and disturbance...he got an status quo exparte order...the actual fact is opposite....earlier prior to this suit the defendant filed a 144 CrPC and police report was favourable to him...can that police report be shown as an evidence (annxture with the objection)for to show that claim of plaintiff is false in this civil case?riven