rajvinder singh
24 September 2009 at 21:08
my query,sir but i confused sir i am confused because additional evidence will take place only when the evidence has already been taken place before lower court.in my case evidence has not taken place .now at this stage should i move application under 41 r 27 or simply move an application for placing the photos on fie
riven
Member (Account Deleted)
24 September 2009 at 20:35
Our Indian Constitution's Preamble says
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a _1[SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC] and to secure to all its citizens:
JUSTICE, social, economic and political;
LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among them all
FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the _2[unity and integrity of the Nation];
IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.
MY QUESTION IS: 1) AS PER OUR PREAMBLE IS THERE ANY SOCIALIST IDEALOGY IN OUR COUNTRY AS THERE ARE RESERVATIONS FOR DIFFERENT CATEGORY COMMUNITIES?
PLEASE CLARIFY.
riven
kuruvanagaraju
24 September 2009 at 19:31
. I belong to Alur kurnool (Dist) of Andhrapradesh and presently residing in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. With an ambition to support my family and to get self employed I contacted “M/s VENUS TRADING COMPANY, WZ-508/1, Basai Dara Pur, Behind Ramesh nagar Metro Station Delhi-110015 ” based on their advertisement placed in the daily news papers “Rajasthan Patrika” and “Dainik Bhaskar”. After going through their website www.venustradingco.com and written material supplied by them I paid them Rupees 2000/-(Two Thousand) in advance vide bill no 507 dated 18 Apr 2009 and later I paid the Rupees 48,000/-(Forty Eight Thousand) for the six head thread winding machine. As per the agreement they have to supply the raw material of 240 kg/week and pay the labour charges of Rs 35/Kg for the finished goods what we supply to them. With the machine they supplied only 40 kg of the raw material which is costing Rs 900/- and after finishing 18 Kg of the raw material we sent back to them. Till now the company has not paid the labour charges and not supplying the raw material and not returned the agreement which I sent back for correction in respect of transportation charges.
3. The original cost of the machine supplied by them is only Rs 27,000/-(Twenty Seven Thousand ) as per the original bill received by me where the company received Rs 50,000/- from me. Besides over charging they supplied me a faulty machine. The company neither rectifying the faulty machine and nor replacing and not supplying any raw material. My repeated letters for the return of the machine to the company became unclaimed
hence i request you suggestion and helpriven
Deepak
24 September 2009 at 17:42
Lost in Magistrate Court even after producing the following documents
1. Letter to the complainant asking for giving back old cheques and giving part of principle amount
2. Complainant took the principle amount but never acknowledge the same.
3. Complainant gave two dates as to deposit of the cheques one of which is impossible because he cannot remain present in two different places at one time and the other date is impossible because the cheque cannot come with in a day in a bank.riven
NARESH
24 September 2009 at 16:54
my housing society in mumbai is passed resolution for redevelopement getting all legal formalities done nexus with developer.
since i stay out of country most of time,not aware of legalities,i am asked to sign acceptance agrrement with developer with threating to face legal case if not signed.
i donot agree with certain terms and conditions mentioned and refused to sign the same.Later i found out that there are 12 out of 56 members refuse to sign.
i am informed by secretary of society that they can forcefully break the lock of my flat in my absense if i dont vacate willingfully.I stay 11 months out of country.
kindly advise my rights and what action i can take to resolve this matterriven
Prateek Biyani
24 September 2009 at 16:32
Sir please explain the basis terminology of Law like 'Halaphnama', writs, decree of court.riven
AMIN M KESHWANI
24 September 2009 at 15:19
I am an Indian. I had issued four crossed account payee cheques canceling bearer words in favour of ICICI Bank Limited. I had given the said security cheques to an agent of ICICI Bank against proposed personal loan who turned out to be a fraud person. He misused two cheques and added his name, account number after the words ICICI Bank Limited. and deposited in his ICICI Bank a/c with Rs.11200/- on one cheque and Rs.8000/- on another cheque. Both the cheques were debited from DCB bank a/c on 18-6-09 and 20-6-09 respectively. Remaining two cheques were stopped by me.
Subsequently, I obtained a photocopy of those two cheques from DCB clearing department which clearly showed that his hand writings were completely different from my handwritings. On enquiry with ICICI Bank, I came to know that he is neither a staff of ICICI bank nor a loan account holder of ICICI Bank. He is merely a customer of the bank. I had written a full stop after the last words Limited. and it was clearly visible. I did not put a line after the words Limited. because the bank from whom I was to get the personal loan would require it for writing my loan a/c number. My intention was to give it to ICICI Bank for loan purpose only and for no other purpose. If my intention was to give the amount to any person, I would straightaway write his name. I will never write the name of the bank first and then the name of the person. Even in the case of dividends received from companies, they first write the name of the payee (shareholders name) and after that they add bank name and bank a/c number of the shareholder.
My question is – Was ICICI Bank right in crediting the amount to its customers account when the first name written on the crossed account payee cheques was of ICICI Bank Limited. ?
Does it matter if first name is of a bank or of a customer? Because I am under the impression that this amount can be credited only in ICICI bank a/c OR any other a/c which is under the control of ICICI bank such as loan a/c and it cannot go to any of the customers a/c of ICICI Bank.
Please advise me as to whether I can claim the loss of Rs.19200/- incurred to me from any of the two banks mentioned above?
riven
attenuator
24 September 2009 at 15:19
Dear members,
I shall be greatly obliged for your kind suggestions concerning the following matter:
I have been married (arranged) for exactly 13 months now but have lived together for only 5 months (from april-aug 2009), as immediately after marriage, I had left for completion of my PhD abroad. Now for the past one month, my wife has been living with her parents after imposing all nonsense and false allegations on me. I do not know anything about their intentions but apprehend that they may file a false case if the results are not to their satisfaction. In this regard, I have a few queries:
1. Since, the property (a duplex house) is on my name, does my wife stand any chance of claiming any share after we get divorced ?
2. Is there any law wherein the dowry is returned after divorce. I ask this as there was no written agreement between both parties ?
3. Since, I am unemployed and not in a position to pay the alimony, will I be instructed by the court to somehow pay it. For your information, we do not have any children as of now ?
4. Also, as far as alimony is concerned, I would like to know how the rules change in case we have a child ?
I shall be extremely thankful if you all could help me out from this extremely unfavourable situation!riven
Jaideep Garg
24 September 2009 at 15:17
Sir I wanted to know that which type of defences available to accused in SC & ST Act. What is the meaning with in public perview. Whether at the time of commission of offence any person from Swaran Communnity is necessarry. Whether the person who belonged to Backward class can be made accused in SC and ST Act.riven
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 N.I. Act
company received a bounced cheque on 29.09.2000 and issued a notice to intimate the party of the bounced cheque notice dated 15.10.2000 but dispatched the same through registered post recipt dated 22.10.2009 and received undelivered by the date mentioned on A.D. is 24.10.2009 by the postal dept. is the notice is within the time prescribed and is maintainable for filing the compalint and if no plase give the judgment on the aforesid case, please.riven