Anonymous
09 December 2009 at 00:31
Respected sir,
‘Mahafiskhana’ which is in charge of keeping land records of survey settlement (took place between 1914 to 1927) of my area. I am in need of certified copy of Survey settlement (Khatiyan) document of my land. When I approached ‘Mahafiskhana’ where it gets issued, they r telling that all the record of your area has been badly mutilated and has been reduced to pieces, so it cannot be obtained. Rare records have been reduced to pieces. There is no other place from where we can get it. Employees are drawing huge salaries, and are not capable of keeping records. From where should I get it? Who is responsible? Where shall I complain? Is complaining to Hon’ble High Court will be fruitful? Thanks to all.
ABHINAV JAIN
08 December 2009 at 23:23
Whether a Civil Court Can be impleaded as party respondent in a writ petition filed against its order?
1.S.C. in A.I.R. 1963 SC 786 held in affirmative.
2.S.C. in A.I.R. 1999 SC 976 held(rather observed in para 14) in negative
3.Raj. H.C.(SB) in one decision - 2009 WLC 57 upheld the decision of S.C. in A.I.R. 1963 SC 786
4.Raj. H.C.(SB) in another decision - unreported(but passed a day before the above judgement in 3) rejected S.C. judgement in A.I.R 1963 SC 786 but upheld S.C. Judgement in A.I.R 1999 SC 976 (Para 14).
In my view decision of the S.C. in A.I.R 1999 SC 976 (para 14) is not the ratio decidendi but merely an obiter dictum, therefore no court inferior to the S.C. is bound by its obiter dictum in any case?
Kindly Suggest?
ABHINAV JAIN
08 December 2009 at 23:21
Whether a Civil Court Can be impleaded as party respondent in a writ petition filed against its order?
1.S.C. in A.I.R. 1963 SC 786 held in affirmative.
2.S.C. in A.I.R. 1999 SC 976 held(rather observed in para 14) in negative
3.Raj. H.C.(SB) in one decision - 2009 WLC 57 upheld the decision of S.C. in A.I.R. 1963 SC 786
4.Raj. H.C.(SB) in another decision - unreported(but passed a day before the above judgement in 3) rejected S.C. judgement in A.I.R 1963 SC 786 but upheld S.C. Judgement in A.I.R 1999 SC 976 (Para 14).
In my view decision of the S.C. in A.I.R 1999 SC 976 (para 14) is not the ratio decidendi but merely an obiter dictum, therefore no court inferior to the S.C. is bound by its obiter dictum in any case?
Kindly Suggest?
Anonymous
08 December 2009 at 22:57
can you help me regading the case law on the following point as it is very urget,,,
ON PANCHANAMA THERE IS NO POINT OF IMPACT IS SHOWN AND NOT ALSO THE SCRATCH MARKS ON THE ROAD..WHEN BOTH THE THINGS ARE NOT SHOWN ONE CANNOT MAKE OUT WHO'S MISTAKE IT IS....
on the above mentioed point i wanted case laws can you help me...plz mail me at advsagarparab@gmail.com
Sumir
08 December 2009 at 22:53
I am taking from maharashtra, despite of giving clear evidences of corruption against a very big authority they are merely, forwarding the complaint to the same department against which I complaint with the request for departmental Inquiry, and the department gives any nonsense explanation, tell me what to do?
KANWARJIT MANIPAL
08 December 2009 at 21:32
MY FATHER WISHES TO GIFT A PROPERTY IN CHANDIGARH TO ME .IS ANY STAMP DUTY OR TAX TO BE PAID?
KANWARJIT MANIPAL
08 December 2009 at 21:30
MY FATHER WISHES TO GIFT A PROPERTY TO ME .IS ANY STAMP DUTY OR TAX TO BE PAID?
vinod bansal
08 December 2009 at 21:02
R/Members
I filed a crl complaint u/ss 498 A/506/406 IPC which was sent for registration of FIR & investigation u/s 156(3)crpc , in my complaint only one person was impleaded as an accused and in prayer clause,legal action was also sought against only one person.Police after investigation filed challan against five other family members of above stated accused also whereas complaionant requested legal action only only person,is police challan/investigation is legal in the eyes of law.Regards Thanx
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
What is Challan ?
Dear Ld Friend,
Why we use the challan word although there is no word definition in Cr.P.C?
In English what we say the right word excluding challan ?