Tipsy
09 March 2010 at 20:23
Reg– Strong objection to Commencement Certifiate for 27 Storey flats at Manisha
Gardens Mulund East & refusal of Occupation certificate
Dear Sirs,
By an allotment letter dated 23rd August 1988 M/s.Vikas Builders agreed to allot me a flat of 900 sq ft at a lump sum price of Rs 2,25,000/-
The said Vikas Builders promised to enter in to regular agreement but failed to do so on the excuse that the plans are yet to be sanctioned by the Bombay Municipal corporation.
It appears that Vikas Builders entered in to development agreement on 24th January 2006 with one Shri Govind Naidu Proprietor of Manisha Developers keeping various purchasers in dark. As per the development agreement various rights were given by the said Vikas Builders in favour of the said Govind Naidu.
When I learned about the said Development agreement and subsequent sanctioning of the plan by the Bombay Municipal Corporation I filed a suit in the High Court being suit No 1178 of 2008 against both Vikas builders and Govind Naidu. The said suit is still pending
It appears that the building is about to be ready . It appears that the defendants are commiting breach of the promise given to me and various purchasers regarding the allotment of flats in the said construction in spite of our having paid them part payment
I have therefore to request you not to grant builders completion or occupation certificates till they allot flat to us as per the allotment letter dated 23rd August 1988
Parthasarathi Loganathan
09 March 2010 at 19:35
NEWS ITEM:
Heed victim plea to wed rapist:
"In a radical suggestion, the Chief Justice of India, K.G. Balakrishnan, on Sunday said judges, lawyers and social activists should give “due regard” to the wishes of a rape victim if the latter wishes to marry the offender."
In my opinion,
It amounts to Grave injustice to Rape victims. It would pave way increase of sexual crimes in the country and the offender may even plead exception to family laws. If he wants to marry any girl through coercion he would simply commit the crime and seek proposal from the victim to enter the wedlock.
Can the Experts join this debate
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 19:31
TO FIND CASE STATUS IN CHENNAI HIGH COURT I FOLLOW THE LINK AS http://www.courtnic.nic.in/chennai/content.asp BUT WHEN I GIVE DETAILS FOR PARTY SEARCH ANDD ADVOCATE SEARCH THE PAGE DOES NOT SHOW ANY RESULT WHY IT IS PLEASE HELP ME SIR
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 19:16
I need urgent help, my uncle who took a loan from bank has expired and my aunt is not able to pay it now, Bank has send a POSSESSION CUM SALE NOTICE under the powers conferred by section 13(4) of SARFESI Act 2002 which says that
"...... the notice is given to borrowers and the public in general that the undersigned has taken symbolic possession of the properties...."
My aunt is the only earning member and she has 2 daughters and a mother-in-law to feed.
Please suggest what she can do to save her house as their home is the only property they own.
Thanking in anticipation
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 18:30
Sir, if any listed company has received one letter and gives an acknowledgent only for the receipt of letter. What is procedure for an acknowledgement for the receipt of letter only (contents of letter has not being verified at the time of receipt of letter).
Further, if any of the contents is not accepatable to the company, what is procedure to be follow by the company and within what timeframe.
Sir, if possible, please tell me the relevent Section Number of the relevant act under which the same is required.
Thanks.
sankar.n
09 March 2010 at 18:26
IS THERE ANY JUDGEMENT OR RULING IN FAVOUR OF THE LENDOR/FINANCIER/LEGAL OWNER TO GET BACK THE VEHICLE(LORRY) UNDER HYPOTHICATION FROM THE COURT WHILE THE RC OWNER IS OBJECTING TO IT AND ALSO CLAIMING TO GET THE VEHICLE(LORRY). THE CASE IS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE POLICE. THE LORRY HAS BEEN SEIZED BY THE POLICE FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE FINANCIER WHICH WAS LEGALLY REPOSSESSED DUE TO DEFAULT IN THE PAYMENT OF DUES BY THE HIRER/RC OWNER. THE RC OWNER HAD GIVEN A COMPLAINT UNDER 420 IPC AGAINST THE RE-POSSESSION OF THE LORRY BY THE LENDOR/LEGAL OWNER/FINANCIER.
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 17:44
sir,
my saving was 60,000/- in the year and my office deducted a amount of Rs 9000/- from my salary as income tax. i got fixed an amount of Rs.95,000/- in tax saver fix deposit of pnb as advised by my office dealing clerk. what amount i can get back from income tax department and can i get the refund premature from what i invested in fix deposit.
Solace
09 March 2010 at 17:41
My client has been awarded Rs.2000/- Monthly maintenance from her husband in proceeding 125 Cr.pc. My clients husband is government employee, he is earning 25thousand per month. My client wanted to file civil suit against her husaband to get atleast 10 thousand rupees as monthly maitenance. May I know from experts about suit valuation ,court fee . Whether my client have to zttend court on every hearing or not.
attenuator
09 March 2010 at 17:41
Dear Experts,
We got married in august 2008 according to hindu traditions, but since september 2009, me and my wife have been living separately. She for without any reasons is living with her parents now. The reason I suspect is that she wants to be in close company with her former boyfriend which is not possible in her in-laws home. I came to know about their affair when I saw romantic messages in her cell phone sent by him. Although I could have filed for divorce on the ground of adultery, but I feared that she might file a false 498 against me and ruin my career. However, on February 22nd, she did file a fabricated 498 A petition in a PS, but the CI there was quick to realise this and no FIR was filed against me as both the parties have agreed for a settlement amount and divorce by mutual consent. I have a few queries in this regard:
1. Is mere filing of 498 a petition (and not FIR) in a PS enough for hindering my travel abroad in future or in creating any problems in me getting a decent job in India (I'm a doctorate from abroad).
2. Although the girl's family has agreed for mutual consent divorce, do I need to take any precautions so that I'm not harassed by them again as I do not trust them at all at this stage. Please advise me what all has to be done to avoid any hassles in future!
3. Even after getting a divorce decree, is it possible that the other party can still file some fake cases against me ? If so, within how many months after divorce?
4. From the date of divorce decree, when can I get legally get married again ?
5. As her cell phone is still with me as an evidence, what would be the ideal period to return it to her, that is whether after filing for mutual consent divorce or after getting the decree. Please advise me so that me and my family can overcome this turmoil!
Thanks in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Land Purchased
if we purchased the land on the basis of B-FORM,is it valid or not.
The buyer can get the rights on land or not??????
Please let me know ? state - andra pradesh