Chintan Shah
10 March 2010 at 13:09
Dear collegues,
Mr. X's mother has some land and a flat to her name. There are also some loans and advances that she has given to her relatives. X's mother dies. X has a sister who is married. X's mother doesnot have a will. In this case who will inherit the property and in what share? What is the procedure to be followed for the same? Will the court appoint administrator or executor for the property of X's mother? Or can X himself become the executor?
The second question is a modification to the above:
If X is the only heir, is it necessary to get an order of the court to inherit the property or is it automatically inherited?
I am completely new to the field so please donot mind my doubts... And please do explain in detail..
Thanks in advance,
Chintan
Anonymous
10 March 2010 at 12:39
Are the benefits of fundamental rights as enshrined in Part III of the Constitution, available to a non-citizen and a citizen of India like?
Neelamkumar
ravi anu ramraika
10 March 2010 at 12:32
for 482,may i go direct supreme court
Anonymous
10 March 2010 at 12:30
sir,
can a non statutory organisation directly file a writ petition in the supreme court under A.32? if so what are the grounds on which they can claim locus standi? is there any recent case laws that deals with this concept??
sushil bhatt
10 March 2010 at 11:57
Dear All
Can a sole arbitrator ask the parties to file an affidavit in respect of admission/denial of documents. As per my knowledge, the parties can only file an affidavit before a court only and the arbitrator/arb. tribunal is not a court.
pls advise.
hussain
10 March 2010 at 11:19
Sir,
we are purchasing cartoon with a specfic lenth and design but between me and party there not any contract for that in this case T.D.S is applicable or not please sugges me and one another thing that one party is charging only Vat @4% and another party is charging Cenvate Payable @8%the Ed Cess 2% sec cess 1% after all this tax inculding materail value on that they charge us 4% vat.
Thanking You
Jibanananda Goswami
10 March 2010 at 10:10
Dear Sirs,
In my previous queries, I asked several times about the legal value of an un-authenticated reply of RTI application. After first appeal, I got the certified copies of some (not all) documents but the original answers sheet is not stamped/sealed. Actually they just sent the certified copies and not anything else. But the answer sheet is the main evidence. The sheet is plain A4 papers. Each pages is signed by somebody(now after having the attested copy, I know that the somebody is P.R.A. NAIR, under Secretary to the GOI) Now the question is:-
1. The law of evidence permits that documents may be proved either by primary or secondary evidence. Sec.65 of the Evidence Act provides for the admissibility of secondary evidence under certain circumstances. In the instant case, eventhough the document obtained under RTI is not a certified copy, if the litigant files a sworn affidavit to the effect that he has obtained the copy of the documents through RTI and that the original is in possession of the party against whom the document is sought to be proved, then what will be the status of admissibility of this uncertified document. If there are any legal practitioners among our members, please clarify on this point.
2. As the documents are attested with signature and seal of P.R.A. NAIR and the answer sheet is signed by him, can the answer sheet be treated as authenticated by comparison of the signature on it and on the attested documents? Which authority can certify that the signatures are same?
3. Is there any legal term that describe "the reply must be signed, sealed and anything else required to be treated as evidence under all the Courts"? If any, please give reference to the laws. Even I mentioned the format as "Certified papers that can be used for official and legal proceedings" they sent plain copies first. In first appeal, I referred to the definition of "Certified copy" in INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, section 76 and then got attested copies.
If you please like to see the complete information, visit www.openrti.co.cc. I have placed all scanned copy and also typed the content.
Anonymous
10 March 2010 at 09:42
SIR I AM HAVING TWO FIX DEPOSITS AMOUNTING RS 30,000/- AS TAX SAVER DEPOSIT IN PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK NOW I WANT TO BREAK THE DEPOSIT SO THAT I COULD GET PROPER TREATMENT OF MY DIABATIC FOOT WHAT SHOULD I DO.
Anonymous
10 March 2010 at 09:37
sir, my anual salary is 3,00000/-& saving was 60,000/- in the year and my office deducted a amount of Rs 9000/- from my salary as income tax. i got fixed an amount of Rs.95,000/- in tax saver fix deposit of pnb as advised by my office dealing clerk. what amount i can get bac
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 n.i act and 420 ipc
respected sirs,
i want to the conditions and circumstances in which FIR under 420 ipc can be lodged paralelly with 138 n.i act. i hope you can understand what i mean to say