Anonymous
03 June 2010 at 18:24
One of the owners of the apartments I live who have a duplex aparment have encroached into the common area on the terrace claiming it to be to their balcony. Their sale deed does not show it as their balcony but as an open area.
I approached the AP high court and it has given a stay order not to construct. in spite of the order they constructed and a contempt case was filled.
They are trying to twist the facts and are saying that the construction was made before the courts stay order.
Recently, their appeal to regularize the disputed area under U/s 455-A of GHMC sct with the Greater Hyderabad Municipal commissioner has been rejected.
What should be the course of action that I should take to get the illegal , unauthorised and encroached area to be demolished.
They have good political connections and the GHMC is going slow on the issue.
Suneeta Yadav
03 June 2010 at 18:10
Hello All,
The above mentioned dispute is between my father-in-law (i.e. 1st Party) and his brother's sons (i.e. 2nd Party). The 2nd party constructed a room in which a pumping set was established which is in front of the house of the 1st party. The land belongs to gram samaj it was possessed since the time of anscesters of both the parties. Last year during the process of partition of property through Panchayat it was decided that the 2nd party will shift his pumping set and remove his construction work which is in front of the house of the 1st party, which creates disturbance to the 1st party. Against which the 1st party will pay him Rs.15000/- and leave some land which is in front of the 2nd party's house. The agreement was signed on stamp papers by both parties and the panchayat members. Now when the 1st party is paying the aforesaid sum the 2nd party has refused to take the money and also refused to shift his pumping set and construction work, saying that this amount is not adequate, they need Rs. 100000/- because you are paying the money too late. However, no time limit was mentioned in the agreement, what are the options left before the 1st party.
I would be grateful for the responses and any other feedback, I am thankful to all group members.
with regards.
suneeta yadav
Anonymous
03 June 2010 at 18:05
sir my name is srikanth,and i'm in search of a job.a guy by the name rishikesh reddy approched me and said that he wil show job for me for some money.he gave me the offer letter of a top mnc and i deposited money into his account.later i came to know that the offer letter is fake.when asked about it he gave me an post dated cheque.few days back his news came in the newspaper as mastermind cheaters.i immediately went into the bank and lodged the cheque.i was shocked to hear from the bank authorities that the sign ont he cheque didnot match with the original one.i dont know whether i can file an fir regarding the cheque????http://expressbuzz.com/cities/hyderabad/uk-mba-graduate-among-four-held-for-job-fraud/176956.html
Anonymous
03 June 2010 at 17:48
MR.X left his home by year 1998.police taken "man missing" case. but no result yet.his relatives are mother,wife and 3 brothers.he had property in his place.by 2008,his wife got divorce thru court.in 2010 one of his brother died.
now legally who are legal heirs of his property?
nusishedi
03 June 2010 at 17:46
MR.X left his home by year 1998.police taken "man missing" case. but no result yet.his relatives are mother,wife and 3 brothers.he had property in his place.by 2008,his wife got divorce thru court.in 2010 one of his brother died.
now legally who are legal heirs of his property?
R P BANSAL
03 June 2010 at 17:20
I was working with Reliance Communications at Level 1, Top Management Cadre Officer, Suddenly without any notice or indications on 31 October 2006 around 5 PM Company's HR Chief Mr. K. S. Kumar called me in his chamber and handed over a letter titled 'Termination of Service', the letter states as -
“As per your appointment letter dated November 29, 2001, your services are liable to be terminated without any notice or salary in lieu thereof for any act of ‘inefficiency’.
Hence it has been decided to terminate your services with immediate effect i.e. close of office hours today Tuesday 31, October 2006.”
Please note that there is no such condition in the Appointment letter dated November 29, 2001 as referred above,
I filed a suit in Delhi High Court for service restoration, but the suit for restoration of service was not maintainable as no such service rule \ Act applicable to non-government senior grade officials in the Country, please note that for Government Employees Administraive Tribunal Act is there, for non-government employees Industrial Dispute Act is available but applicable only below Managers Cadre, I was allowed to withdraw the suit filed for specific service matters and HC granted liberty to me to take other appropriate measures,
Above of all since more than 42 months has elapsed company has not paid me the legaly and legitimately entitled dues for which Criminal Case (summons under section 204 of CrPC has been issued by Court for appeariance to Anil Ambani, Satish Seth and 6 others) under Section 405, 415, 418, 420 with 34 of IPC, for which Ambani and other has taken Stay under section 482 of CrPC)
I have now filed a Civil Suit by treating my Appointment letter as an Contract of Service Agreement for Professional Service (I am possessing BE\ME from an IIT and was ITS officer in Dept. of Telecom, at level of Dy.Dir.General)and filed a civil suit for 'Breach of Contract (professional expertise service Contract),
I seek expert advise on the matter, I am fighting all legal battle from giants Reliance Communications Anil Ambani on my self and presenting my cases in Courts on personal appeariance and pleadings only, one case I have partialy already bon, Consumer forum fined them for not clearing my Provident Dues, They have paid the fine imposed but Provident Fund refunded partialy only etc.
Anonymous
03 June 2010 at 17:02
Can a Practicing Advocate act as director of a compnay.
If yes? What legal action take in case of defalut of company
Anonymous
03 June 2010 at 16:43
Dear All,
I seek your indulgence under the circumstances as to whether during pendency of a transfer petition before Supreme Court a husband can seek visitation right by moving appropriate petition/application especially when the matter under custody of the child is under stay by Order of Supreme Court.
Thanking You
Best Regards
Anonymous
rocky
03 June 2010 at 16:43
IM A CHEMICAL DEALER.IAM SELLING CHEMICALS WHICH ARE APPLIED FOR PROCESSING OF SEMI FINISHED LEATHER INTO FINISHED LEATHER.IAM SELLING THESE CHEMICALS AGAINST FORM XVII.
BUT NOW I HAVE RECEIVED A NOTICE FROM CTO SAYS THAT THE CHEMICAL SHOULD NOT BE SOLD AGAINST FORM XVII FOR PROCESSING OF SEMI FINISHED LEATHER INTO FINISHED LEATHER SINCE THERE IS NO MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY INVOLVED AND NO NEW COMMERCIAL COMMODITY IS EMERGED.
SO CAN I KNEW THAT IT IS A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY OR NOT? CAN THE CHEMICALS BE SOLD AGAINST FORM XVII?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
gud evening friends
hello friends,
i would like to know the cosultation fees of a lawyer, and in respect to their grades, like jr. advocate, advocate on record & most reputant advocate. pls, furnish me the information and if any provisions of advocates act, 1961 supports it.