Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 12:53
please answer along with the relevant sections of CrPc and evidence act with full procedure.
manish
09 June 2010 at 12:15
sir,
i had been working in a service oriented co for the last nine years. due to some argument i was asked to leave during the discussions with my md.
i later resigned voluntarily and served the notice period. i was only asked to sit in one place and not doing anything.
i received my relieving letter. but my full and final settlement is due.i.e two months salary + gratuity + bonus.
during the year 2008 i had cleared import shipment by paying excess duty of rs70000. later as per law we can file refund at customs.
this particular job is not mine.
now the company is telling that untill refund of rs. 70000 is not got they will not settle my dues.
what should i do.
Raghavendra P Hogade
09 June 2010 at 11:36
1st plaintiff borrowed loan from the bank by mortgaging the property of 2nd plaintiff. The 1st & 2nd defendants are the bank and the 3rd & 4th defendants are the guarantors for the loan transaction. Plaintiff defaulted to the bank. bank had filed a case before the DRT. DRT allowed the application of bank and issued the recovery certificate. now the plaintiff has filed a case before the civil judge (jr dn) seeking an injunction order from the court not to attach the 2nd plaintiff's property. the relief sought by the plaintiff is against the bank only and no relief is sought against the 3rd defendant, the guarantor. but the 3rd defendant has been arrayed as party in the injunction suit and there is an allegation against the 3rd defendant in the suit that he has colluded with the bank in the loan transaction. since the suit is for permanent injunction and the prayer sought for by the plaintiff is against the bank and since there is no relief is sought against the 3rd defendant, whether the 3rd defendant can file an application u/o 1 r 10(2) of CPC to delete him from the proceedings. Pl. provide me the case laws on this issue
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 11:34
I was purchased a Shop in the year 2005 @ Rs.175000/-, All payment made through cheques (in favour of (Mr. A) seller/agent) and DD in favored (Mr. B) actual land lord. Mr. A was fraudulently transferred this Shop in favour of his wife (Mrs. C) in absence of me (I was out of station). After a long dispute Mr. A and his wife (Mrs. C) issued two cheques from their joint account, as security of Shop till payment made against this shop. Duly compromise in the meeting held with family members and friends, Mr. A and his wife (Mrs. C) agreed to pay Rs.425000/- for the cost of Shop where cost of shop is Rs. 9 Lacs, asked me to deposit the cheques with amount of Rs. 2 lacs and Rs. 2.25 Lacs.. Unfortunately both the cheques were returned unpaid due to “PAYMENT STOPPED BY DRAWER” I have filed a complaint suite u/s 138 NI Act against Mr. A.
Let me advise what should be done to fast recovery.
lokanadham c
09 June 2010 at 11:34
sir,
who is competent authority to control and supervision of daily transactions and management of private trust under indian trust act ?
if any trustee in private trust voilated and mis managed the accounts and property of trust, the third person can sue or restrain said trustees ?
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 11:14
i am going to purchase a FLAT aging 10years and the vendor document has been documented as follows:In the stamp paper Schedule - A: 731.16 Sq. ft. out 5400 Sq. Ft. and Schedule - B: about the building only they were mentioned house, electicity, common deposit, house tax and other common aminities respect to the common Flat. But in the annexture they were mentioned UDS as 731.16 Sq. Ft. as said above. But regarding building area they mentioned 731.16 Sq. Ft. while cross verifing with the building through manual measurement build up area comes 786.10Sq. Ft. proportionate % on built up area that 13.54% (out of 5808.80Sq. ft.full building for 8 houses) as well as the common area comes 109.85 Sq. ft(13.54%)( out of 811.40 Sq.Ft. full common area for 8 houses and the extra area provide on request is 48.15% total salable flat area comes 944.10Sq. Ft. is available build up area the same has not mentioned in the document. It has been wrongly mentioned as 731.16Sq. ft. But we have to mention the building details as available in my register document. What is the necessary step has to be taken for the same, to avoid future problems.
eswarkumarpotti
09 June 2010 at 11:05
good morning all experts,
I am in need of draft application for conducting ex- parte application to be filed befor Dist consumer forum.
brief of the case:-
i have made complaint to dist consumer forum aganist nokia india ltd for not tracing my mobile phone which was given to Nokia priority for repair. to the date ,01 year passed , none of the represntative of the nOkia has attended the proceedings nor intiating for defending the case.
pl giude me what to brought in application for conductiong above proceedings. its urgent , the subject case is listed for hearing on 11 Jun 10.
thanking you all
Eswar Kumar
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 11:03
Hi All
In my PWDVA case, no interim or other words have been passed, the lady is well-earning and has asked only for exorbitant monetary reliefs.
A settlement has been reached quite a while back and we are only waiting for the mutual consent divorce to be filed, after which the petitioner has undertaken to withdraw the PWDVA case.
The PWDVA case has been undergoing adjournments to allow for divorce to be filed. I have not been appearing personally in the adjournment proceedings as the matter is all but settled. My counsel has been appearing in all hearings.
The mutual consent divorce is pending withdrawal of the CAW Cell complaint by the petitioner which the petitioner was supposed to withdraw many months back. All her stridhan has been returned and she has given a witnessed certificate to the effect that she has no further claims of stridhan etc. from me or any member of my family.
Now the petitioner has filed an application to the court in the PWDVA case praying to direct me to appear personally because she wants to harass me instead of withdrawing her CAW Cell complaint.. I live far away and cannot come easily.
What should be my response?
Thanks!
ganesh
09 June 2010 at 10:54
I am working with M. R. Morarka-GDC Rural Research foundation as a assistant manager. it is registered under the Mumbai Public Trust Act,1950, Registration No e-13255 @ FCRA Registration no 125620002.
In December my boss sent me on tour while returning from tour i got an accident. I got a fracture in my elbow. for that i have to got for operation and i took two month rest for post operation recovery and physiotherapy. My organization didn't pay salary for that period.after joining i submitted my bills to hr department.The organization didn't pay me any claim, any reimbursement and any payment for the period when i was on rest for post operation recovery...after that my organization transfered me another place. I did my job there. Now I needed another operation to remove steel accessories fitted in my elbow.On 1st June,2010 , I applied for leave for the same operation by email. At the same day my senior asked me verbal to hand over the document which i was having.i gave them all documents. for next four day i was not assigned any job..On morning of 4th June I was asked by mail to go to HR department.I meet HR on 5th June.2010. My HR manager asked me that we don't need you please don't come from tomorrow to the office. he didn't gave me anything in written..........
I am working with a NGO.......My HR manager said me that we don't come under workman compensation act. One more thing as the company has asked to not come to job from tomorrow.....But i have go under operation in this month am i also entitled for reimbursement of that that medical expenses also...i more thin i want to ask am i also entitled for compensation for disability due to this accident........not my elbow don’t function properly.......
Now what should I do?? I have three issue........my medical reimbursement......my salary for the rest period( 2 month) due to medically unfit.
But they are doing commercial activities under the name of Morarka Organic Food Pvt Limited, by the name same employee when ever they need they change the STAMP. The designations are same........ They are doing a lot of irregularities.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
fraudulently transfer offlat and bounce of cheques
I was purchased a Shop in the year 2005 @ Rs.175000/-, All payment made through cheques (in favour of Mr. A (seller/agent) and DD in favored Mr. B actual land lord. Mr. A was fraudulently transferred this Shop in favour of his wife (Mrs. C) in absence of me (I was out of station).
After a long dispute Mr. A and his wife Mrs. C issued two cheques from their joint account, as security of Shop till transfer of ownership made in favour of me but neither he transfer the said shop in faveour of me nor made payment. When I contact to Mr. A he refused to do so and threatening to commit suicide and name to me. By this act Mr. A has the clear cut intentions from the very beginning to cheat me of the same property.
I was lodged a complaint against with local Police Station and after a mediation of police and mutual friends they agree to compromise and settle this matter.
Duly compromise in the meeting held with family members and friends, Mr. A and his wife Mrs. C agreed to pay Rs.425000/- for the cost of Shop where cost of shop is Rs. 9 Lacs, asked me to deposit the cheques with amount of Rs. 2 lacs and Rs. 2.25 Lacs.
Unfortunately both the cheques were returned unpaid due to “Payment Stopped by Drawer” I have filed a complaint suite u/s 138 NI Act against Mr. A.
Can I file a suite of against Mr. A and his wife Mrs. C.let me advise which sections will be applied in this case.