Anonymous
19 June 2010 at 23:26
Can any one tell me the remedies available to a tenant who has been living in a renten land for nearly 20 yrs by building own kacha house.There is no any deed as to the term and condition of the lease/tenancy and there is no any proof/receipt of the rent @ 300 per month till date paid as rent.Now the landlord has institued a suit for ejectment.
padmavathi
19 June 2010 at 22:17
Dear sir/madam,
i would like to know about D.V act, to whom it implys and how can it will be excuted, does a married women get a right in her husband house to stay, after she pushed from her in-laws house,
Thanking you,
padmavathi
Anonymous
19 June 2010 at 22:07
Sir,
A application U/S 156(3) filed by me in the court of M.M for order to Police to register the case U/S 498 A, IPC.
But Court ordered to register the case as a complaint case.
I want's to go to high court to quash the order. can you sugges me any RULLING of supreme court that the application of 156(3) cannot be register as a complaint case.
Self service
19 June 2010 at 21:20
I got some termination compensation and leave encashment in April 2010. Terminated on 30 March 2009.
Can i claim amount as relief under 89 ? Employeer clearly mentioned said amout as termination compensation on final settlement but on form 16 all amount shown as salary.
Please advice.
Anonymous
19 June 2010 at 20:07
I WAS CHARGED WITH THE OFFENCE UNDER WILD LIFE ACT,I WAS BAILED OUT ON BOND OF RS.50,000.I REMAIN ABSENT FOR 4 HEARINGS CONT. & APPEARED ONLY ONCE.WHEN I WENT ON LAST DT.OF HEARING,MY LAWYER TOLD ME TO DISAPPEAR FROM THE COURT AS THE BAIL BONDS HAVE BEEN FORFEITED.NOW WHAT IS THE REMEDY FOR ME.ALSO THE SURETIES R MY BROTHERS. THE CHARGE IS NOT FRAMED YET.NOW PL. GUIDE ME WHAT TO DO,AS MY LAWYER IS SAYING THAT I HAVE TO DEPOSIT RS.50,000,OR I WILL BE SENT TO THE JAIL,THANX.
Anonymous
19 June 2010 at 20:06
I WAS CHARGED WITH THE OFFENCE UNDER WILD LIFE ACT,I WAS BAILED OUT ON BOND OF RS.50,000.I REMAIN ABSENT FOR 4 HEARINGS CONT. & APPEARED ONLY ONCE.WHEN I WENT ON LAST DT.OF HEARING,MY LAWYER TOLD ME TO DISAPPEAR FROM THE COURT AS THE BAIL BONDS HAVE BEEN FORFEITED.NOW WHAT IS THE REMEDY FOR ME.ALSO THE SURETIES R MY BROTHERS. THE CHARGE IS NOT FRAMED YET.NOW PL. GUIDE ME WHAT TO DO,AS MY LAWYER IS SAYING THAT I HAVE TO DEPOSIT RS.50,000,OR I WILL BE SENT TO THE JAIL,THANX.
pratik
19 June 2010 at 20:01
if a driving lience obtain for the other state say as an example form u.p. can a person drive the motor vehicle in any other states in india. or vice - versa.
Thankin u all experts in advance.
pratik
19 June 2010 at 19:55
14. Currency of licences to drive motor vehicles.
(Provided that every driving licence shall, notwithstanding its expiry under this sub-section continue to be effective for a period of thirty days from such expiry.)
15. Renewal of driving licences.
(1) Any licensing authority may, on application made to it, renew a driving licence issued under the provisions of this Act with effect from the date of its expiry:
(Provided that in any case where the application for the renewal of a licence is made more than thirty days after the date of its expiry, the driving licence shall be renewed with effect from the date of its renewal:)
Query:
As per section 14 the section says that if the driving licence if get expiry than also it is valid till 30 days but section 15 says that if the driving licence in any case where the application for the renewal of a licence is made more than thirty days after the date of its expiry, the driving licence shall be renewed with effect from the date of its renewal:) so the period given under the section 14 of the said act that is 30 days & if the person is caught with the traffic cops in the road & the cops says the driving licence is expiried so we are laible for the offence. cant we says we get 30 days more after the expiry of the driving licence as per the act.
So if a person driving licence expiry on 31/1/2010 so as per section 14 he will get 30 days time more to drive with out the driving licence 1/3/2010 he renews is driving licence but between the time that is from feb to march if he or she is caught than he is without the lience or with the lience as per the section 15.
Pls correct & direct me if i am worng.
i think the lience is valid as per the section 14 which says (Provided that every driving licence shall, notwithstanding its expiry under this sub-section continue to be effective for a period of thirty days from such expiry.)
Because there he words notwithstanding & continue to be effective comes.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
lingaraj kalawad
19 June 2010 at 19:54
Hello sir,
PLEASE SEND UR VALUABLE SUGGESTIONS REG DEFENCE:
Mr.X(MY BROTHER) HAS TAKEN A LOAN AT (BANK)
BY MORTGAGING THE PROPERTY,HE WAS RUNNING
A SHOP.IN DUE COURSE HE BECAME A
DEFAULTER.IN THE MEANWHILE I WAS GIVEN A
CHEQUE IN THE NAME OF X'S SHOP FOR SOME
OTHER PURPOSE WHICH I DID NOT CLLECTED
BACK.MR.X HAD GIVEN THE SAME CHQ TO THE Y
(BANK)WITHOUT BRNGNG TO MY NOTICE.ACTUALLY
I AM NOT A GUARANTOR NOR A SURITY TO THE
SAID LOAN.NOW THE BANK 'Y' HAS FILED A
CASE AGAINST ME(SINCE ONE YEAR)& TILL DATE
THE BANK AUTHORITIES HAVE NOT DONE
EVEDENCE ON THEIR SIDE.BANK HAS SANCTIONED
THE LOAN ON THE DATE PRIOR TO MY CHQ DATE
(ABOUT 1 WEEK).THERE IS NO LEGALLY
ENFORCEABLE DEBT OF MINE AND I AM NO WAY
CONCERNED TO THE SAID TRASACTION.PLEASE
SEND YOUR VALUABLE SUGGESTIONS IN THIS
REGARD SIR.
Regards
LINGARAJ.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Reinstatement in service
Some one please cite me a ruling where a govt. servant was reinstated after suspension and was imposed only minor penalty after enquiries were conducted to impose major penalty, hence his suspension was treated unjustified.
There is an order to the effect from GOI that when after enquiries to impose major penalty ultimately ended with imposition of minor penalty the suspension should be treated wholly unjustified.