Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 14:18
sir,
one person has filed about 100 criminal cases under 138 niact 1881 against various persons tollalling around 90 lakhs.he has stated in his complaint he has lent as friendly loan @2%p.m. he also stated that he given without maintaining any books.and given in cash .he does nt have money lending licence.does his debt covered under legally enforcable debt??? any judgement on this subject?? plz provide me as soon as possible
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 13:42
sir,
,hw much salary of central govt employee can attach in case any attachmemt order from asst collector has been recd.in case of loan taken from co-operative society.is it posslble dat complete salary can be attached as per society rules?? plz let me know as early as possible.its urgent
mukesh jain
21 June 2010 at 13:26
I had lended about Rs.3.00 Lacs in cash to a person. Now he is not returning the money. I have a signed Hundi alongwith a cheque for repayment. Can I present cheque to bank, and in case the cheque dishonour file a civil case IPC 138/IPC 420 can be filed, please advice.
Sumir
21 June 2010 at 13:22
Somebody took signatures of people for certain reason on a paper, and then wrote matter over top of it, misrepresenting the facts, under which sections is it punishable?
mihir kr. ghosh
21 June 2010 at 13:16
property belonged to deceased mother, left behind 12 sons and daughetr, there after father died on 1982. the plaintiffs have instituted a suit for partition of property against two brothe(defendants).
the two defendants have been residing there with their parents, others were in different location due to service and marriage of daughters and so on.the defendants contested on the plea of that they are exclusive owner as per ;
i)oral will of the parents,
ii) they have constructed 1st and partly 2nd floor on the suit propertyby their own fund, accordingly, owner as per easemenr act,52.
iii)suit barred by time.
please clarify.
thank you.
Baskaran Kanakasabai
21 June 2010 at 13:10
If a lawyer or a judge had purchased a land 10 years ago under a registered sale deed with the registered owner of that land after duly obtaining a clean nil encumbrance certificate for previous 20 years from the SRO and built a house of his own obtaining a building loan from a bank through a registered mortgage, and lives in that house for a few years, and later if some government corporation claims that such land belongs to that corporation by virtue of a notification published under LA Act,1894 and the related proceedings or by virtue of proceedings of some such other Act notified 17 years ago,
What will be the reaction of such lawyer or judge in this scenario?
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 13:07
Hi everybody. Could anyone tell me in which act the age of retirement is mentioned for employees.
As the age for deducting pension from an employees salary is said to be 58 years.
Please help.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 12:58
Respected Experts,
Plz. Clarify the doubt and give a solution for the query.
A and B are contesting a landed litigation since 40 years. While things stands thus, both of them entered into a compromise and accordingly a decree has been taken in favour of “A”. To implement the said decree, "A" has approached the revisional authorites and when the matter was carried before the revisional courts, “B” also raising some technical disputes against “A” and wherein “A” has succeeded in all Revisional Authorities and also Single Judge of High Court. Again the matter was carried out by “B” upon the judgment of Single Judge.
While a Writ Appeal pending before the Division Bench of High Court, “C” entered into the picture and got purchased 3/4th of the lands by way of Registered Sale Deed and 1/4th of the lands by way of Registered Agreement of Sale cum GPA. I think that “C” entered into the said lands, knowing about the dispute and further “A” has succeeded in all lower courts and with a view to succeed before Division Bench also, since “A” has valid reasons to win the case.
Unfortunately the Division Bench has quashed all the orders below and that a SLP is filed and it is pending before the Apex Court. At this movement, “C” has the following doubts.
1. “C” wants to implead in this SLP as a party, as he was not impleaded earlier.
2. In case, if A colludes with B, what “C” should do?
3. Is there any possibility by A, to cancel the above two registered deeds, either today or tomorrow.
mihir kr. ghosh
21 June 2010 at 12:44
property belonged to deceased mother;
there after two sons claimed property right ignoring other 10 sons & daughters only on the plea of oral will of the parents,please clarify.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
negotiable act 1881
sir,
one person has filed about 100 criminal cases under 138 niact 1881 against various persons tollalling around 90 lakhs.he has stated in his complaint he has lent as friendly loan @2%p.m. he also stated that he given without maintaining any books.and given in cash .he does nt have money lending licence.does his debt covered under legally enforcable debt??? any judgement on this subject?? plz provide me as soon as possible