Anonymous
03 July 2010 at 01:37
hey hi.....can you plz give me some information regarding bhu law .....hows that college....n hows there moot court ...is it regulare conduct....n seminar n conference is they counduct regularlly or not ...n the most important ..hws d placement ....is bhu study touch compare 2 all other like dellhi university.... ...plz tell me as soon as possible ....plz ..help me out...n one more question hows BVPnew law college,pune ...hows there placement ....plz help me out from this problem ......
Scenario:
1. The interested person does not agree to the acquisition
2. The LAO deposits the award money in the court.
3. The interested person alienates for a sum of money his notified land by registered sale to another person who is unaware of the LA proceedings pending behind the land.
4. The matter goes to court, the judge declares the alienation as void and the purchaser is deprived of his land by eviction without any compensation.
5. The acquiring authority takes possession of the land.
6.At this point, the original notified person has got his money for the land he sold, and the LAO got his land for the money he deposited in court but the purchaser has neither got his money paid to the vendor nor got the land sold to him by the vendor,
How does law consider this as justice or even as a matter of logic?
In this situation what happens to the money deposited with the court?
What is the legal prescription/status for such unclaimed award money?
In the last 116 years of the existence of the LA Act 1894, how such unclaimed awards have been dealt by the courts in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Sri Lanka?
SURYA
02 July 2010 at 22:38
Hi ,
There is a civil suit between the father and the son , in which earlier father has all the properties which were not self acquired properties in his name in the records which were registered records , but after the suit for partition was filed by the sons he started disposing of the properties from his name to some other relative name or some one else name or just sold to some one to just show that he was not the owner as he is denying to be owner in all the above properties because if he admit it he has to give the share but now the property were sold to some third party with out partition , so what is the alternative avalible with the sons in civil sense does son still have right and what can son do to set all thing right again.
Surya
Please provide me name and complete postal address and telephone no., e-mail address of CPIO under RTI act for Ministry of Company affairs, new delhi
Anonymous
02 July 2010 at 22:32
Why the accused captured by Police is bringing with covered face?
ITO not accepting saral-II i.e. ITR-1 for the Income from other sources only. He is stating for filing ITR-1, you must have some income from salary also, otherwise filr ITR-2. Is he right. But in instructions with ITR-1, it is clearly mentioned that there is no such binding. Advice.
Anonymous
02 July 2010 at 22:26
A PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH OFFENCE 377IPC, THE VICTIM IS MINOR THE STATEMENT OF THE FATHER OF THE VICTIM U/S164 HAS BEEN RECORDED IN THE COURT.THE MEDICAL REPORT IS IN FAVOUR OF ACCUSED.NOW THE CHALLAN HAS BEEN PRODUCED IN THE COURT BUT BOTH PARTIES WANT TO COMPROMISE ,IS IT POSSIBLE?
In order 21 rule 58(5) of C.P.C, what does Word "REFUSE TO ENTERTAIN" means?
Is it refuses PRIMA FACIE or on MERITES of case?
Once a NAME mention in birth certificate(kept under Birth,Death & Marriage Regigitration Act)be amended ? If yes,What's the Procedure?
false information
"A" gave false information to public servant "B". This is punishable under IPC, but who can a third party "c" make a police complaint against "A" or it has to be "B" who can make police complaint