rishabh
24 November 2018 at 14:11
Sir,
I filed a writ petition before high court impugning an order passed by CAT rgarding non adjudication on the ground of delay.
High court issued notice and convinced me that, it would remand the case to CAT.
Afterwards my case was connected to an another petition and a judgement was pronounced as a common judgment alongwith other petition and my matter was adjuducated upon by DB of high court without any full contest and without any original adjudication by CAT..
Sir, there was no order ever passed by the court for connecting the two petitions and these were connected arbitrarily.
Sir, connecting the petitions was illegal and no approval from Chief justice was taken. Original adjudication was illegal.
this connection has infringed my right to have original proceedings before CAT.
what to do now ??Can I file a petition under art 32 for enforcement of my right to have original proceedings before CAT??
there is a considerable delay in the matter but involves fundamental rights.
Plz Guide.
Regards.
rishabh
24 November 2018 at 13:58
Sir,
Is there any time limit for filing application under section 156(3) CRPC ??
I know there is a time limitation for cognizance but, I am confused over 156(3).
Regards.
Anonymous
24 November 2018 at 10:15
Thank you for taking the time to read and respond to my mail and your response is of great help for me.
My cr case in Bangalore which has been going on since last year was quashed by High Court last month. I have the copy of the HC order with seal and it clearly says "Following the aforesaid judgement, the proceedings in the case on the file of XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Bangalore are quashed. The petition is accordingly allowed. No costs."
My Questions are:
1) My case status in ecourts website with lower court (XI ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE) still shows as NBW (Non-Bailable Warrant) and my next court date is in December. My fear now is, despite the case being quashed, will I be arrested if I show up to the court since the status is NBW. Please help with your advice.
2) My lawyer wants me to come to court to sign somewhere for the order. Is it normal to have to go to court after the order has been passed to sign? Is there a way to manage it without me going there? I am also afraid of being arrested if I show up to court.
3) What is the process after quashing, does this mean the case is permanently over and I dont have to worry about it anymore?
Thank you very much for your response in advance. Will look forward to hearing from you.
munshilal
24 November 2018 at 08:33
Dear experts kindly read the following-- as i wish to understand--why the PoA has been rejected by the court.
Subhash Chandra had on November 17, 2016 moved the court through a power of attorney to Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva, seeking prosecution of Mr Kejriwal for allegedly defaming him by levelling false allegations in the wake of demonetisation
A Delhi court on Saturday discharged chief minister Arvind Kejriwal in a defamation complaint filed by Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament or MP Subhash Chandra, saying Mr Chandra had not followed proper procedure while filing his plea.Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate Samar Vishal granted the relief to the Aam Aadmi Party chief, noting that Mr Chandra had filed the complaint through a power of attorney which is "barred" under law.
The court said that Mr Chandra was at liberty to file a fresh complaint in accordance with law."Hence proceeding further with this case will be a futile exercise as this case is also filed through power of attorney. Accordingly the accused Arvind Kejriwal is discharged from this case," the court said.
Anonymous
24 November 2018 at 08:14
An FIR has been filed by my parents as missing at two different places. I am married and living with my husband. Now my parents knowing this want to withdraw or close the FIR. All i want to know is "do i need to go to those two police stations to close or withdraw the FIR. Looking forward to your merciful answers at the earliest
Hemant Sharma
24 November 2018 at 02:18
Dear Sir,
We have an existing society consisting of 2 Wings (A&B respectively) with 143 members. Now a third Wing (C wing) has been constructed and the developer has sent a letter to our society asking to merge the 82 members of C wing in our society. For the record there are some common amenities shared by the 3 Wings (Gymnasium, Garden, Terrace Garden). My query is.....can C wing be formed as a separate society as many of our members are against merging of C wing members with our society due to the fact that they have 3 lifts in their Wing compared to 2 lifts in A&B Wing? Is there are a rule to merge the C wing members to our society as many of the amenities are shared? Can we form a federation or Apex body to manage the common areas if required?
Thanks in advance for your response.
mohan
24 November 2018 at 00:18
Me and my brother have 95% portion in a pond/ talab whereas so many other partners( almost 6) are there in totally they have only 5% . now the pond became non productive . can I go for Court for partiton Mamla and can it be fruitful?
Anonymous
23 November 2018 at 19:00
Sirs
If plaintiffs were granted status quo on suit property under 39 2a but not with in a month but injunction application was adjudged after six months, was it not obligatory on part of plaintiffs to inform defendant and file an affidavit to that effect that defendant has been notified of the status quo. Not academic query.
In Gujarat was it not mandatory to register lis penden by plaintiffs.
Anonymous
23 November 2018 at 18:03
As per agreement buider give corpus fund to our housing socity,can society deposit this amount to individual members?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Confirmation of employee and benefits to employee
Hi
Pleasze guide me the time limit to make confirmation to Employees in the Organisation .
My Friend work in a Pvt Ltd company . They do not confirm the employee till Two or more years ( Even don't issue letter to extend probation Period) to avoid Leave Benefits and other Benefits to Employee , is it correct as per law.