Mustafa Bhat
30 June 2014 at 11:11
Sir,
In 498A & 406 Case filed by my ex-wife, 8 PW have been examined out of 8 PW 4 PW supported the prosecution & other 4 PW didnot , on 27-06-2014 one of PW was examined who happened to be witness of my divorce, while he deposed his statement in court he didnot supported Prosecution as he has said same in his 161 also, but Presiding Officer ( Judge) attitude was total different he started cross examining the PW on his own & than asked the Prosecuting officer not to call the rest of PW as they are all my neighbors.
And later issued direction to the father of complainant to get his counsel on next date of hearing even though the case is state V me.
I sense the Judge has inclination towards the Complainant.
His approach has been some what similiar to other PW also who didnot support the Prosecution.
Please advise what should i do now.
& what credibility the Judge will keep to the statement of PW who donot supported Prosecution.
prachi sharma
01 June 2014 at 11:08
Sirs / madams
My advocate of Noida court has taken fee of case in advance. Now he is not attending case hearing.How to tackle this please guide me where to approach for solution.
Member Strength 9,50,920 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ni act
An accused after being convicted in a cheque bounce case preffered an appeal in session court.What is the effect of non appearance of complainant and his advocate after being sommoned on cr. appeal?